To a critical ear, the silence is as deafening as it is worrying. After 11 months of official reports of a sustained fall in the birth rate, the Swedish mainstream media have reacted.
However, news reports omit any reference to a possible involvement of the elephant in the room: mRNA vaccines. So, what is the evidence that we should all have an opportunity to consider?
The number of children born in Sweden has decreased by an average of 8.6% over the period from January to November 2022. The largest percentage decreases occurred over the most recent three months of reporting (September-November 2022). Over this period, 11.7% fewer children were born in Sweden to women aged 18 to 45 years, based on the figure expected from regression analysis of data from the previous 10 years.
[...]
If a stark correlation with an atypical decline in birth rate was the only signal, it should warrant an immediate halt to mRNA vaccination. However, both Pfizer and the regulators, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the EU, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U.S., and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the
U.K., amongst other national agencies, were aware that mRNA vaccines could lead to effects on fertility. So how did the regulators miss this signal and even more significantly, how did the regulators authorise these products without appropriate safety testing?
Pfizer’s application to the Japanese Patent Office in 2020 showed that intramuscular injection of modified mRNA with the same lipid nanoparticle carrier formulation as their COVID-19 candidate, dispersed widely through the body and away from the site of injection. The mRNA accumulated and was expressed in organs, including the ovaries of female rats.
stewart
1 day ago
Another reason they didn’t want a control group of unjabbed, and
yet another reason why the unjabbed have done a service to humanity.
TheBasicMind
1 day ago
Reply to stewart
Except we have the equivalent of the control group of the unjabbed. Every single OECD country has it and every single OECD country is wilfully hiding it. The vaccination status of the women who are giving birth is known and hidden. Why are doctors and scientists like Drs Roman and Gilthorp and Prof Norman Fenton having to struggle with incomplete data to try to work out what is going on? The authorities in every OECD nation will know precisely the vaccination status of new mothers and, beyond this story, for each cause of death category, yet unconscionably, they are hiding this data. It would be easy to debunk the sceptics and “conspiracy theorists” at a stroke. Yet they don’t, This tells us all we need to know.
evidence collector
1 day ago
The article states: “A similar pattern was not observed after the H1N1 swine flu epidemic in 2009…”
Typo or not, if one look at the numbers, there were a decline in births approx 12 months after the swine flue mass vaccination in Sweden. Vaccination began in October 2009 and ended April 2010. As far as I can see from the statistics (SCB), there were a decline for the full year 2011 compared to 2010.
Same thing in Finland.
The drop in birth rates after swine flue vaccination would be very interesting to look into as it may disqualify behaviour change as an explanation. There were no lockdowns back in 2009-2010.
Conclusion: Also the swine flue vaccine may have caused some fertility issues, but in such case not in the same magnitude as covid-vaccines. If someone can help verify the numbers it would be great.
If verified, this leads to the suspicion that there are may be issues NOT ONLY with the covid-vaccines.
Don’t know exactly when fertile women got the swine flue vaccine but probably they were not the first ones to be vaccinated – which also may explain the slight delay in birth rates occurring mainly in 2011.
Analogous example: Covid-vaccines in France. Decline appears to have started a few months into 2022 (although we have only preliminary figures from France). Macron made an aggressive push towards the unvaccinated during summer 2021 as people were generally very sceptical to the vaccines in France with low vaccination rates. But following the push, many people (primarily young ones one might expect) were coerced to take the shot.
Just bringing some thought/data to the table. Do we have any Sherlock’s here who can help verify/falsify any of the above – please do! This is extremely important to look into, in my view.