I am moron. Fauci bad. Why I don’t know. Something Big pharma bad. Why I don’t know
Don't feel down, you're not a complete moron if you realize Fauci is bad, that Big pharma is bad, even if you don't know why. That makes you smarter than almost every vaxxer in this thread!
I am moron. Is it possible for me to get my outstanding scholarly works published on natural news, gateway pundit, or dailyexpose? I don’t trust anybody and martians 👽 came down and told me my works outstanding
I am moron. Is it possible for me to get my outstanding scholarly works published on natural news, gateway pundit, or dailyexpose? I don’t trust anybody and martians 👽 came down and told me my works outstanding
Yes. We right wingers. Right wingers dumb and likey uneducated people. Ask Dump, just no use “smart” word him.
My favorite part of the piece is, “Yet because of poor messaging from officials, many people may not even realize the US is experiencing a surge.”
I am one of those many people who did not know this.
A surge of what? A normal seasonal flu that makes people feel a bit under the weather for a week? A bad cold-vid?
We can celebrate our return to the old normal when an outbreak of a seasonal virus is of concern to those who are infected or who care for a family member. All of society need not be thrust into a panic over such things. The more normal the world is, the more resources of those who are impacted will have to deal with their troubles. And the better will those who are not directly affected be able to support them.
In flying his private jet to attend an in person conversation with the Lowry Institute in Australia this week, the supposedly carbon conscious Gates admitted that the shots serve virtually no benefit to anyone, especially the most vulnerable population.
“We also need to fix the three problems of [mRNA] vaccines,” Gates started. “The current vaccines are not infection blocking. They’re not broad, so when new variants come up you lose protection, and they have very short duration, particularly in the people who matter, which are old people.”
In a special in-person conversation with Lowy Institute Executive Director Dr Michael Fullilove, Mr Gates will talk about global health, pandemic preparednes...
Translation: Gates admits that the shots are impossible to align with rapidly developing variants, they expire in lighting speed, and they don’t stop transmission. And they don’t work for the only at-risk portion of the population.
It’s an incredible reversal from the man who once advertised the shots as the cure to the coronavirus, once remarking that “everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal.”
[..]
Described by Politico as the “world’s most powerful doctor,” Bill Gates and his network wields incredible influence over the world of “public health.” Gates is primarily responsible for seeding America’s Covid policy catastrophes.
In the Lowry interview, the technocratic tyrant also applauded Australia for locking down their population indefinitely in the early days of Covid hysteria, arguing that in the future this should be a model for the “pandemic response.” Gates demanded the establishment of a permanent security state infrastructure that mandates compliance.
In flying his private jet to attend an in person conversation with the Lowry Institute in Australia this week, the supposedly carbon conscious Gates admitted that the shots serve virtually no benefit to anyone, especially the most vulnerable population.
“We also need to fix the three problems of [mRNA] vaccines,” Gates started. “The current vaccines are not infection blocking. They’re not broad, so when new variants come up you lose protection, and they have very short duration, particularly in the people who matter, which are old people.”
Translation: Gates admits that the shots are impossible to align with rapidly developing variants, they expire in lighting speed, and they don’t stop transmission. And they don’t work for the only at-risk portion of the population.
It’s an incredible reversal from the man who once advertised the shots as the cure to the coronavirus, once remarking that “everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal.”
[..]
Described by Politico as the “world’s most powerful doctor,” Bill Gates and his network wields incredible influence over the world of “public health.” Gates is primarily responsible for seeding America’s Covid policy catastrophes.
In the Lowry interview, the technocratic tyrant also applauded Australia for locking down their population indefinitely in the early days of Covid hysteria, arguing that in the future this should be a model for the “pandemic response.” Gates demanded the establishment of a permanent security state infrastructure that mandates compliance.
I will always despise Gates because he a pedophile. But at least he admits the truth. More than can be said for so many others that continue to worship at the mRNA alter. The Vaxxtard religion remains surprisingly strong.
I will always despise Gates because he a pedophile. But at least he admits the truth. More than can be said for so many others that continue to worship at the mRNA alter. The Vaxxtard religion remains surprisingly strong.
It is pretty amazing to see the pompous trolls here, defending long abandoned propaganda talking points, with their ad homimen, and most recently, the sad attempts at satirical impressions of antivaxxers.
"I am moron. Is it possible for me to get my outstanding scholarly works published on natural news, gateway pundit, or dailyexpose? I don’t trust anybody and martians 👽 came down and told me my works outstanding"
At least seven million Americans have had their hearts damaged either by Covid or Covid shots. It is also “within the realm of possibility” that as many as 100 million Americans have developed some degree of heart damage, acc...
Never in modern history has such a synchronised decline in birth rate been seen across the world, precisely aligned with the rollout of an experimental medical treatment, write Dr. Sven Román and Dr. Jonathan Gilthorpe.
To a critical ear, the silence is as deafening as it is worrying. After 11 months of official reports of a sustained fall in the birth rate, the Swedish mainstream media have reacted. However, news reports omit any reference to a possible involvement of the elephant in the room: mRNA vaccines. So, what is the evidence that we should all have an opportunity to consider?
The number of children born in Sweden has decreased by an average of 8.6% over the period from January to November 2022. The largest percentage decreases occurred over the most recent three months of reporting (September-November 2022). Over this period, 11.7% fewer children were born in Sweden to women aged 18 to 45 years, based on the figure expected from regression analysis of data from the previous 10 years.
[...]
If a stark correlation with an atypical decline in birth rate was the only signal, it should warrant an immediate halt to mRNA vaccination. However, both Pfizer and the regulators, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the EU, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U.S., and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the U.K., amongst other national agencies, were aware that mRNA vaccines could lead to effects on fertility. So how did the regulators miss this signal and even more significantly, how did the regulators authorise these products without appropriate safety testing?
Pfizer’s application to the Japanese Patent Office in 2020 showed that intramuscular injection of modified mRNA with the same lipid nanoparticle carrier formulation as their COVID-19 candidate, dispersed widely through the body and away from the site of injection. The mRNA accumulated and was expressed in organs, including the ovaries of female rats.
stewart 1 day ago Another reason they didn’t want a control group of unjabbed, and yet another reason why the unjabbed have done a service to humanity.
TheBasicMind 1 day ago Reply to stewart Except we have the equivalent of the control group of the unjabbed. Every single OECD country has it and every single OECD country is wilfully hiding it. The vaccination status of the women who are giving birth is known and hidden. Why are doctors and scientists like Drs Roman and Gilthorp and Prof Norman Fenton having to struggle with incomplete data to try to work out what is going on? The authorities in every OECD nation will know precisely the vaccination status of new mothers and, beyond this story, for each cause of death category, yet unconscionably, they are hiding this data. It would be easy to debunk the sceptics and “conspiracy theorists” at a stroke. Yet they don’t, This tells us all we need to know.
evidence collector 1 day ago The article states: “A similar pattern was not observed after the H1N1 swine flu epidemic in 2009…”
Typo or not, if one look at the numbers, there were a decline in births approx 12 months after the swine flue mass vaccination in Sweden. Vaccination began in October 2009 and ended April 2010. As far as I can see from the statistics (SCB), there were a decline for the full year 2011 compared to 2010.
Same thing in Finland.
The drop in birth rates after swine flue vaccination would be very interesting to look into as it may disqualify behaviour change as an explanation. There were no lockdowns back in 2009-2010.
Conclusion: Also the swine flue vaccine may have caused some fertility issues, but in such case not in the same magnitude as covid-vaccines. If someone can help verify the numbers it would be great.
If verified, this leads to the suspicion that there are may be issues NOT ONLY with the covid-vaccines.
Don’t know exactly when fertile women got the swine flue vaccine but probably they were not the first ones to be vaccinated – which also may explain the slight delay in birth rates occurring mainly in 2011.
Analogous example: Covid-vaccines in France. Decline appears to have started a few months into 2022 (although we have only preliminary figures from France). Macron made an aggressive push towards the unvaccinated during summer 2021 as people were generally very sceptical to the vaccines in France with low vaccination rates. But following the push, many people (primarily young ones one might expect) were coerced to take the shot.
Just bringing some thought/data to the table. Do we have any Sherlock’s here who can help verify/falsify any of the above – please do! This is extremely important to look into, in my view.
One of the most idiotic episodes of the last 772 days.
Congratulations vax mob mafia. You brought stupid to a new level.
"Massachusetts COVID-19 vaccine lottery was not associated with a significant increase in the number of adults aged 18 to 64 who were fully vaccinated or received at least one dose of the vaccine, compared with other states."
Objective We evaluated whether the Massachusetts COVID-19 vaccine lottery increased vaccine uptake. Methods We analyzed data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker to identify total numbe...
Vaccinated people: What do you believe would have happened to you if you remained unvaccinated ? Do you regret your decision ?
Unvaccinated people: What do you believe would have happened to you if you took the vaccine ? Do you regret your decision ?
Unvaccinated, absolutely zero regrets. I believe I have more robust, broader, and more durable immunity than my thrice and quadruple vaccinated friends who are still getting sick, having shingles and HSV1 infections “reactivated,” etc, and some of who have died, either in their sleep or during exploratory surgeries to find out “what’s wrong” with them after getting injected.
No idea what my prognosis would’ve been with the vaccines, probably wouldn’t have noticed it other than feeling fluish, but I would be sitting here wondering if I had some type of sub-clinical myocarditis or how long the LNP-encased spike factories endured in certain of my organs and what would be the longer term ramifications. I couldn’t not be concerned. So, no regrets. Someone had to be the control group.
The interesting thing about data and RCTs is nobody is doing them for the naturally immunized, unvaxxed, not really. Just like nobody was or is doing them for some of the early protocols that were met with success. Hard to bring data and a RCT when nobody is getting funded to do it or recruiting people like myself.
To a critical ear, the silence is as deafening as it is worrying. After 11 months of official reports of a sustained fall in the birth rate, the Swedish mainstream media have reacted. However, news reports omit any reference to a possible involvement of the elephant in the room: mRNA vaccines. So, what is the evidence that we should all have an opportunity to consider?
The number of children born in Sweden has decreased by an average of 8.6% over the period from January to November 2022. The largest percentage decreases occurred over the most recent three months of reporting (September-November 2022). Over this period, 11.7% fewer children were born in Sweden to women aged 18 to 45 years, based on the figure expected from regression analysis of data from the previous 10 years.
[...]
If a stark correlation with an atypical decline in birth rate was the only signal, it should warrant an immediate halt to mRNA vaccination. However, both Pfizer and the regulators, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the EU, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U.S., and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the U.K., amongst other national agencies, were aware that mRNA vaccines could lead to effects on fertility. So how did the regulators miss this signal and even more significantly, how did the regulators authorise these products without appropriate safety testing?
Pfizer’s application to the Japanese Patent Office in 2020 showed that intramuscular injection of modified mRNA with the same lipid nanoparticle carrier formulation as their COVID-19 candidate, dispersed widely through the body and away from the site of injection. The mRNA accumulated and was expressed in organs, including the ovaries of female rats.
stewart 1 day ago Another reason they didn’t want a control group of unjabbed, and yet another reason why the unjabbed have done a service to humanity.
TheBasicMind 1 day ago Reply to stewart Except we have the equivalent of the control group of the unjabbed. Every single OECD country has it and every single OECD country is wilfully hiding it. The vaccination status of the women who are giving birth is known and hidden. Why are doctors and scientists like Drs Roman and Gilthorp and Prof Norman Fenton having to struggle with incomplete data to try to work out what is going on? The authorities in every OECD nation will know precisely the vaccination status of new mothers and, beyond this story, for each cause of death category, yet unconscionably, they are hiding this data. It would be easy to debunk the sceptics and “conspiracy theorists” at a stroke. Yet they don’t, This tells us all we need to know.
evidence collector 1 day ago The article states: “A similar pattern was not observed after the H1N1 swine flu epidemic in 2009…”
Typo or not, if one look at the numbers, there were a decline in births approx 12 months after the swine flue mass vaccination in Sweden. Vaccination began in October 2009 and ended April 2010. As far as I can see from the statistics (SCB), there were a decline for the full year 2011 compared to 2010.
Same thing in Finland.
The drop in birth rates after swine flue vaccination would be very interesting to look into as it may disqualify behaviour change as an explanation. There were no lockdowns back in 2009-2010.
Conclusion: Also the swine flue vaccine may have caused some fertility issues, but in such case not in the same magnitude as covid-vaccines. If someone can help verify the numbers it would be great.
If verified, this leads to the suspicion that there are may be issues NOT ONLY with the covid-vaccines.
Don’t know exactly when fertile women got the swine flue vaccine but probably they were not the first ones to be vaccinated – which also may explain the slight delay in birth rates occurring mainly in 2011.
Analogous example: Covid-vaccines in France. Decline appears to have started a few months into 2022 (although we have only preliminary figures from France). Macron made an aggressive push towards the unvaccinated during summer 2021 as people were generally very sceptical to the vaccines in France with low vaccination rates. But following the push, many people (primarily young ones one might expect) were coerced to take the shot.
Just bringing some thought/data to the table. Do we have any Sherlock’s here who can help verify/falsify any of the above – please do! This is extremely important to look into, in my view.
I’m sure it’s the vaccine not the fact that it costs over 300k to raise a kid to the age of 17 in America.
Vaccinated people: What do you believe would have happened to you if you remained unvaccinated ? Do you regret your decision ?
Unvaccinated people: What do you believe would have happened to you if you took the vaccine ? Do you regret your decision ?
Unvaccinated, absolutely zero regrets. I believe I have more robust, broader, and more durable immunity than my thrice and quadruple vaccinated friends who are still getting sick, having shingles and HSV1 infections “reactivated,” etc, and some of who have died, either in their sleep or during exploratory surgeries to find out “what’s wrong” with them after getting injected.
No idea what my prognosis would’ve been with the vaccines, probably wouldn’t have noticed it other than feeling fluish, but I would be sitting here wondering if I had some type of sub-clinical myocarditis or how long the LNP-encased spike factories endured in certain of my organs and what would be the longer term ramifications. I couldn’t not be concerned. So, no regrets. Someone had to be the control group.
The interesting thing about data and RCTs is nobody is doing them for the naturally immunized, unvaxxed, not really. Just like nobody was or is doing them for some of the early protocols that were met with success. Hard to bring data and a RCT when nobody is getting funded to do it or recruiting people like myself.
Vaccinated and I literally do not give a sh!t who is vaccinated or not vaccinated at this point. The majority of Americans went and did the courteous thing. I just accept the fact that there are selfish people in this country afraid of catching aids from the fauci ouchie.
One of the most idiotic episodes of the last 772 days.
Congratulations vax mob mafia. You brought stupid to a new level.
"Massachusetts COVID-19 vaccine lottery was not associated with a significant increase in the number of adults aged 18 to 64 who were fully vaccinated or received at least one dose of the vaccine, compared with other states."
Vaccinated people: What do you believe would have happened to you if you remained unvaccinated ? Do you regret your decision ?
Unvaccinated people: What do you believe would have happened to you if you took the vaccine ? Do you regret your decision ?
Unvaccinated, absolutely zero regrets. I believe I have more robust, broader, and more durable immunity than my thrice and quadruple vaccinated friends who are still getting sick, having shingles and HSV1 infections “reactivated,” etc, and some of who have died, either in their sleep or during exploratory surgeries to find out “what’s wrong” with them after getting injected.
No idea what my prognosis would’ve been with the vaccines, probably wouldn’t have noticed it other than feeling fluish, but I would be sitting here wondering if I had some type of sub-clinical myocarditis or how long the LNP-encased spike factories endured in certain of my organs and what would be the longer term ramifications. I couldn’t not be concerned. So, no regrets. Someone had to be the control group.
The interesting thing about data and RCTs is nobody is doing them for the naturally immunized, unvaxxed, not really. Just like nobody was or is doing them for some of the early protocols that were met with success. Hard to bring data and a RCT when nobody is getting funded to do it or recruiting people like myself.
youve totally lost it. Lol. Kinda funny.
I get that when your “reasonable” worries fall flat it’s easy to preserve to ego to complete jump off the deep end into unprovable BS than admit you were wrong.
I won’t even speak to lies in your first paragraph. No one you know is having exploratory surgery for supposed vaccine injury.
The last paragraph is just blatant, and you know it ha. There are million+ participant RCTs for many of the “early protocols” … they didn’t work.
Vaccinated people: What do you believe would have happened to you if you remained unvaccinated ? Do you regret your decision ?
Unvaccinated people: What do you believe would have happened to you if you took the vaccine ? Do you regret your decision ?
Unvaccinated, absolutely zero regrets. I believe I have more robust, broader, and more durable immunity than my thrice and quadruple vaccinated friends who are still getting sick, having shingles and HSV1 infections “reactivated,” etc, and some of who have died, either in their sleep or during exploratory surgeries to find out “what’s wrong” with them after getting injected.
No idea what my prognosis would’ve been with the vaccines, probably wouldn’t have noticed it other than feeling fluish, but I would be sitting here wondering if I had some type of sub-clinical myocarditis or how long the LNP-encased spike factories endured in certain of my organs and what would be the longer term ramifications. I couldn’t not be concerned. So, no regrets. Someone had to be the control group.
The interesting thing about data and RCTs is nobody is doing them for the naturally immunized, unvaxxed, not really. Just like nobody was or is doing them for some of the early protocols that were met with success. Hard to bring data and a RCT when nobody is getting funded to do it or recruiting people like myself.
Vaccinated. Have much lower chance of complications and long term effects from COVID. (And lower all-cause mortality across all age groups).
Have much broader and more durable immunity (antibody and T-cell) against newly evolved strains
Don't need to make up anecdotes to help me sleep at night, the data is obvious for my side.
“Public Participation Information Interested persons may present data, information, or views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. FDA is establishing a docket for public comment on this meeting.”
