Wuzzle Wuzzle4 wrote:
Let's really tell it like it is wrote:
Aren't you for informed consent when comes to any medical interventions/]procedures? How about bodily autonomy - do you think the government has the right to dictate what you can & can't put into your body?
Here is what you are wrong. You have autonomy. You can get the vax or get a test (which is not an intervention or procedure) . There is not a single vax mandate in the US that doesn't give you a choice. You have vast information about both.
Furthermore in emergencies the doctrine of informed consent is not relevant per the AMA. You seem to have a simple uneducated view of informed consent. It's not simply I can do whatever I want.
Why do you insult posters when you're the one that hasn't done the proper research having no clue what's going on? There are currently four (4) large metro areas under Democratic control that have implemented vaccine mandates/passports where there is no “testing out” option for those declining the vaccine. The four cities are NYC (i.e. "Key to NYC" vaccine passport), Boston, Chicago & SF:
https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/key-nyc-pass-vax-or-miss-outhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcchicago.com/news/coronavirus/everything-to-know-about-the-new-vaccine-requirements-in-chicago-cook-county/2719860/%3fampYou can look up the other two cities for yourself if you don't believe me. So, the mayors of these four cities implemented mandates/passports allowing no exemptions for the sole purpose of punishing the unvaccinated! (Mayor Lightfoot of Chicago even said so).
Yes..."informed consent" is applicable with vaccines during pandemics. And given the low death rate of Covid it's far from an emergency. Big Pharma, Fauci, the MSM & the Liberals have made it out to be an emergency so they can vaxx up every man, woman & child in this country.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430827/"Informed consent is the process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention. The patient must be competent to make a voluntary decision about whether to undergo the procedure or intervention. Informed consent is both an ethical and legal obligation of medical practitioners in the US and originates from the patient's right to direct what happens to their body. Implicit in providing informed consent is an assessment of the patient's understanding, rendering an actual recommendation, and documentation of the process. The Joint Commission requires documentation of all the elements of informed consent "in a form, progress notes or elsewhere in the record." The following are the required elements for documentation of the informed consent discussion: (1) the nature of the procedure, (2) the risks and benefits and the procedure, (3) reasonable alternatives, (4) risks and benefits of alternatives, and (5) assessment of the patient's understanding of elements 1 through 4."
"It is the obligation of the provider to make it clear that the patient is participating in the decision-making process and avoid making the patient feel forced to agree to with the provider. The provider must make a recommendation and provide their reasoning for said recommendation"