Alberto Salazar BANNED For Life for "Sexual Misconduct"

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

But only one to lie - repeatedly. You have sought to correct him but fruitlessly.

Rek has not sort to correct me; you lie.

"Sort"? I rest my case.

Hey mods, why do you let Armstronglivs insult the intelligence of every patriot on this board??? For a barrister, he misunderestimates his opponents in every argument.

ihatejoe wrote:

Hey mods, why do you let Armstronglivs insult the intelligence of every patriot on this board??? For a barrister, he misunderestimates his opponents in every argument.

Is "patriot" a synonym for a moron? By definition, their intelligence can't be under-estimated - that's what being a moron means.

Armstronglivs wrote:

ihatejoe wrote:

Hey mods, why do you let Armstronglivs insult the intelligence of every patriot on this board??? For a barrister, he misunderestimates his opponents in every argument.

Is "patriot" a synonym for a moron? By definition, their intelligence can't be under-estimated - that's what being a moron means.

More insults and contortions of the language.

When will you deal with the outstanding matters within the thread?

high school xc coach wrote:

what an absolute joke safesport is. how can anybody find this to be an acceptable form of due process..

We still don’t know what he did.

original liar soorer wrote:

high school xc coach wrote:

what an absolute joke safesport is. how can anybody find this to be an acceptable form of due process..

We still don’t know what he did.

That's not surprising. Your ignorance extends to everything. The ruling says what he did without the details because the public are not entitled to those as they involve minors. Ironically, that protects Salazar as well as those who lodged complaints against him.

If it was a breach of due process Salazar's legal team would have protested. They didn't. The ruling has not been disputed by them on those grounds.

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Is "patriot" a synonym for a moron? By definition, their intelligence can't be under-estimated - that's what being a moron means.

More insults and contortions of the language.

When will you deal with the outstanding matters within the thread?

I guess you are one of those he describes as a "patriot". We know what that word really means here.

Armstronglivs wrote:

original liar soorer wrote:

We still don’t know what he did.

That's not surprising. Your ignorance extends to everything. The ruling says what he did without the details because the public are not entitled to those as they involve minors. Ironically, that protects Salazar as well as those who lodged complaints against him.

If it was a breach of due process Salazar's legal team would have protested. They didn't. The ruling has not been disputed by them on those grounds.

Insults again.

Have you been following the Maxwell case which has a different “ due process” from Safe Sport.

I prefer the normal “ due process “.

We still don’t know if the AS case involved minors.

So , we know what he did but we don’t know.

Also AS has no rights to go to Court for any lodging of protests. Some “ due process “!

Armstronglivs wrote:

original liar soorer wrote:

More insults and contortions of the language.

When will you deal with the outstanding matters within the thread?

I guess you are one of those he describes as a "patriot". We know what that word really means here.

More insults.

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

That's not surprising. Your ignorance extends to everything. The ruling says what he did without the details because the public are not entitled to those as they involve minors. Ironically, that protects Salazar as well as those who lodged complaints against him.

If it was a breach of due process Salazar's legal team would have protested. They didn't. The ruling has not been disputed by them on those grounds.

Insults again.

Have you been following the Maxwell case which has a different “ due process” from Safe Sport.

I prefer the normal “ due process “.

We still don’t know if the AS case involved minors.

So , we know what he did but we don’t know.

Also AS has no rights to go to Court for any lodging of protests. Some “ due process “!

SafeSport was specifically set up to protect minors.

Salazar appealed to an arbitrator - as he entitled to - but failed. There has been no statement from his team that he was denied due process. Nor has anyone else credibly claimed SafeSport as a practice denies due process.

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

I guess you are one of those he describes as a "patriot". We know what that word really means here.

More insults.

You earn every one.

Armstronglivs wrote:

original liar soorer wrote:

Insults again.

Have you been following the Maxwell case which has a different “ due process” from Safe Sport.

I prefer the normal “ due process “.

We still don’t know if the AS case involved minors.

So , we know what he did but we don’t know.

Also AS has no rights to go to Court for any lodging of protests. Some “ due process “!

SafeSport was specifically set up to protect minors.

Salazar appealed to an arbitrator - as he entitled to - but failed. There has been no statement from his team that he was denied due process. Nor has anyone else credibly claimed SafeSport as a practice denies due process.

Compared with the Maxwell case the breaches from the norms of “ due process “ are significant.

Hearsay is allowed and the process is secret even for adult complaints.

Armstronglivs wrote:

original liar soorer wrote:

More insults.

You earn every one.

You just can’t stop, can you.

But at least you did not fall into your normal racist insults.

-

Comment on due process.

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

SafeSport was specifically set up to protect minors.

Salazar appealed to an arbitrator - as he entitled to - but failed. There has been no statement from his team that he was denied due process. Nor has anyone else credibly claimed SafeSport as a practice denies due process.

Compared with the Maxwell case the breaches from the norms of “ due process “ are significant.

Hearsay is allowed and the process is secret even for adult complaints.

It isn't a court. It is a body that makes decisions about complaints involving sports conduct.

Armstronglivs wrote:

original liar soorer wrote:

Compared with the Maxwell case the breaches from the norms of “ due process “ are significant.

Hearsay is allowed and the process is secret even for adult complaints.

It isn't a court. It is a body that makes decisions about complaints involving sports conduct.

You obviously have not read the link I sent.

What would you refer to a “ due process” within Safe Sport? Normally such would be an external standard.

So as the complaint may have come from an adult then why is it all secret?

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

It isn't a court. It is a body that makes decisions about complaints involving sports conduct.

You obviously have not read the link I sent.

What would you refer to a “ due process” within Safe Sport? Normally such would be an external standard.

So as the complaint may have come from an adult then why is it all secret?

Answer ?

Or have you gone into hiding as can’t answer?

Oh! You go hiding hundreds of times.

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

It isn't a court. It is a body that makes decisions about complaints involving sports conduct.

You obviously have not read the link I sent.

What would you refer to a “ due process” within Safe Sport? Normally such would be an external standard.

So as the complaint may have come from an adult then why is it all secret?

Because it is a sports complaints body and not a court. It isn't "secret" to those involved. Your misplaced comments only reinforce the fatuity of inviting wider public engagement.

Armstronglivs wrote:

original liar soorer wrote:

You obviously have not read the link I sent.

What would you refer to a “ due process” within Safe Sport? Normally such would be an external standard.

So as the complaint may have come from an adult then why is it all secret?

Because it is a sports complaints body and not a court. It isn't "secret" to those involved. Your misplaced comments only reinforce the fatuity of inviting wider public engagement.

You obviously have not read the link.

Nor have you answered what due process have Safe Sport followed.