Alberto Salazar BANNED For Life for "Sexual Misconduct"

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

It was you that said that you would kill me and did so very graphically.

I noticed that the other posters also demolished your arguments. Are you going to threat to kill them.

But well done on no racial insults even though you have not apologised for the racial insults.

You keep avoiding answering the question - what was the "weapon" you claim you were threatened with?

53rd time ; association ban for AS coached athlete.?

It was you that said you were going to split my head.[/quote]

The weapon you claim was going to be used to split your head was a spade. But a spade cannot be a weapon or an implement of any kind - so you say. To you, it can only be a racial term. A bit difficult therefore to split your head - brainless as it is - with a mere metaphor. But I can see that reason would be fatal to one such as you.

So was it a spade that you claim you were threatened by (a bit difficult to wield from a computer keyboard), because if it was it makes a lie of your claim that a "spade" is only racist term and not also garden tool. But you won't respond because you know you have been caught out with your lie. Again. You do nothing but lie. LIAR soorer.

Armstronglivs wrote:

So was it a spade that you claim you were threatened by (a bit difficult to wield from a computer keyboard), because if it was it makes a lie of your claim that a "spade" is only racist term and not also garden tool. But you won't respond because you know you have been caught out with your lie. Again. You do nothing but lie. LIAR soorer.

Never said what you invent.

It depends on the context and both the intended meaning and the meaning that is known to be taken.

And you used several terms and phrases in full knowledge of their desired implications.

Go to a UK soccer games and try and use the terns monkey and spade and see where that gets you.

Armstronglivs wrote:

original liar soorer wrote:

You keep avoiding answering the question - what was the "weapon" you claim you were threatened with?

53rd time ; association ban for AS coached athlete.?

It was you that said you were going to split my head.

The weapon you claim was going to be used to split your head was a spade. But a spade cannot be a weapon or an implement of any kind - so you say. To you, it can only be a racial term. A bit difficult therefore to split your head - brainless as it is - with a mere metaphor. But I can see that reason would be fatal to one such as you.[/quote]

54th time …….

And why lie about the rest?

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So was it a spade that you claim you were threatened by (a bit difficult to wield from a computer keyboard), because if it was it makes a lie of your claim that a "spade" is only racist term and not also garden tool. But you won't respond because you know you have been caught out with your lie. Again. You do nothing but lie. LIAR soorer.

Never said what you invent.

It depends on the context and both the intended meaning and the meaning that is known to be taken.

And you used several terms and phrases in full knowledge of their desired implications.

Go to a UK soccer games and try and use the terns monkey and spade and see where that gets you.

You take only the meaning that suits you, regardless of what was clearly intended. That's what liars (which is how you accurately describe yourself) do.

But again - how can you be threatened with a spade when you insist it is a racist term for a person of color? Lie your way out of that.

Armstronglivs wrote:

original liar soorer wrote:

Never said what you invent.

It depends on the context and both the intended meaning and the meaning that is known to be taken.

And you used several terms and phrases in full knowledge of their desired implications.

Go to a UK soccer games and try and use the terns monkey and spade and see where that gets you.

You take only the meaning that suits you, regardless of what was clearly intended. That's what liars (which is how you accurately describe yourself) do.

But again - how can you be threatened with a spade when you insist it is a racist term for a person of color? Lie your way out of that.

Depending on context.

A word can have several meaning.

And your context was clearly racists except when you threatened to kill me.

Like intent in drug offences does mean a positive means cheating.

original liar soorer wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You take only the meaning that suits you, regardless of what was clearly intended. That's what liars (which is how you accurately describe yourself) do.

But again - how can you be threatened with a spade when you insist it is a racist term for a person of color? Lie your way out of that.

Depending on context.

A word can have several meaning.

And your context was clearly racists except when you threatened to kill me.

Like intent in drug offences does mean a positive means cheating.

A long established literary expression of "calling a spade a spade", used by many writers, is only racist to someone who is both illiterate and determined to find offence where there is none. You have ADS. Armstronglivs Derangement Syndrome.

Armstronglivs wrote:

original liar soorer wrote:

Depending on context.

A word can have several meaning.

And your context was clearly racists except when you threatened to kill me.

Like intent in drug offences does mean a positive means cheating.

A long established literary expression of "calling a spade a spade", used by many writers, is only racist to someone who is both illiterate and determined to find offence where there is none. You have ADS. Armstronglivs Derangement Syndrome.

You have had presented several sources that says the phrase should not be used.

You presented a source your vey self that said that phrase should not be used.

Try using the phrase in certain communities and when they are rather offended you can then call them illiterate and then add that they are monkeys.The latter being another of your throw in words to cause deliberate offence.

Back to you old tricks of calling people illiterate when they come from different communities and perceptions.

You know you use words and phrases; and then repeat them in tounting ways; that others find offensive.

All this supports views expressed on this site that you a bigot who is also racist.

I presented a source that shows what everyone except you knows, that a spade is a gardening implement, and "calling a spade a spade" is a long established metaphor for directness. I shall be direct - in other words I shall call a spade a spade - you are a cretin, intellectually impaired, and possibly more irremediably stupid than anyone who has posted on this site. You are an embarrassment to the community to which you say you belong.

You presented Wiki on the matter.

You only presented the first part of their history of the phrase.

You deliberately left out the section of the article that said that it should now not be used due to racial connotations.

I pointed out this immediately.

So the source/ reference you depended upon did indeed say what I said it said.

I then added further academic references on the matter.

So, you refuse to read, you insult those who have.

Bit of a bigot, then.

You use phrases as a racial insult.

Bit of a racist, then.

So a bigoted racist.

How come the Mexico didn't help the US fight Germany in World War II?

Since you are unfamiliar with English, the fact that a word can have more than one meaning is beyond you. It does not mean that the word can only have the meaning you decide it has.

Take a word like "relief", that has two quite disparate meanings, one that relates to an emotional reaction and the other to a description of topography. You don't remove that choice of available meaning because your confused little brain can only comprehend one of them.

A spade has long been a gardening implement before it was a slang racial term. It still describes a gardening implement. That you cannot comprehend that it was being used in that sense is because you have an IQ of less than 85. But anyone above that level understands that. Calling "a spade a spade" is not calling a person a spade. It's extraordinarily simple but alas quite beyond your (very) modest intelligence.

Your own reference that you kindly provided said the phrase should not be used.A the term has changed in meaning over time to make it racially sensitive.

You refuse too accept your own reference.

You have also added monkey comments to add to your racist insensitivity.

You insult those communities who are offended by calling them illiterate.

You continue to insult those with different views.

Thus a bigot who is also a racist.

"Spade" should not be used as a racial insult. That does not mean it should not be used in its long-accepted meaning to describe a garden tool - or as a metaphor based on that use of the word. What word are you going to replace it with, that millions of English speakers world-wide use and correctly understand? The fact that there are people of substantially below average intelligence like yourself does not justify eliminating terms from general usage that you cannot understand. That would eliminate most of the English language. But that would no doubt suit you, since most of it clearly confuses you. To adopt another metaphor, I think you could usefully be described as a "tool" or a "spanner", which are non-racial slang terms for a person who wastes the time of others.

Your own reference that you adopted said the term should not be used as it is racist; you adopted this.

Thus you are a racist by your own admission.

You continue to insult those that have different views.

There is also a monkey wrench which in context is ok to use but to call someone from a coloured background a monkey is not ; but you do so.

A bigot and a racist.

The term should not be used in a racist fashion but that is not saying that it should not be used in its conventional non-racial context. But of course you didn't get that - you don't get it.

The reason for that cannot simply be that you are possibly the most stupid poster who has ever visited this site. It is because you are obsessed with racism - even where it doesn't exist. The psychologists tell us that a reiterative obsession of this kind reveals the unconscious side of a person. Hence your rantings are in truth a description of what you deep down know yourself to be but cannot accept and so you must project it on to others. Yes - it means you are what you continue to falsely accuse me of; you are a racist bigot.

You have been exposed and now you a are full reverse mode trying to cover your tracks.

But no apology.

Your own adopted submission taints you as a racist.

Your continued insults make you a bigot as you demonstrate in all the threads you post on.

Now the victim blaming; I point out racism and that makes me a racist; really!

I have not ranted only presented back your own submission that the use of the phrase should not be used as it is racist. You confirmed yourself that you are a racist.

So, you continue to dig a big hole called “ for bigots and racists”.

That rant simply shows again you are projecting your own racism. It is all you can talk about. You're closeted but a racist nonetheless. You are probably the biggest racist on these boards.

Armstronglivs wrote:

That rant simply shows again you are projecting your own racism. It is all you can talk about. You're closeted but a racist nonetheless. You are probably the biggest racist on these boards.

Victim blaming.

I am posting over a dozen items currently..

It is your own adopted reference that says you use racists terms.

You add to your racist taunts by calling me a monkey.

Now what of the above is a rant.

I could really rant that you have threatened to kill me.