OozmaKappa wrote:
Sploos on the veal wrote:
No. All that based on your assertion that "Not one person has articulated a good reason . . . . why anyone should care about what goes on in people's personal lives." Again, that shouldn't have need to be explained or articulated for you. Common sense tells you the answer.
You sound more tone deaf than the judge. And she was high. What's your excuse? Day drinking?
If she was high then that makes your witchhunt even more ridiculous. Youre taking advantsge of a woman that not only did not consent to being recorded but also COULD NOT have consented to being recorded as she was not sober.
You're changing the topic and inventing things I never said and positions I never took.
I answered this stupid inquiry of yours: "Not one person has articulated a good reason . . . . why anyone should care about what goes on in people's personal lives."
You have not disputed, criticized, countered and/or otherwise responded specifically to the common sense answer to your dumb question that I provided to you.