I started this thread because it seems to be the topic most talked about in regards to Newbury Park and I think it’s interesting. I fall on the side of the kids, but understand others fall on the side of the coach. I was hoping to hear arguments, takes, data that I haven’t heard before. The truth is, it’s really somewhere in the middle and we should be debating percentages.
This topic may hit a bit too close to home for you. It seems you feel any argument on the side of the kids is a personal attack on the coach. Are the opinions on the side of the coach personal attacks on the kids? Do you have some beef with those kids?
The majority of the responses claiming the kids are the reason for the success seem like rational arguments with data. You may not like the argument or think the data isn’t valid, but it’s not an attack on the coach.
Might be a good idea to take a break from the boards if opinions that don’t match yours come across as personal attacks.