Feinstein comes back with new 'assault weapons' bill, bans 205 guns by name

That makes sense.

"Sen. Dianne Feinstein has found an awful lot of weapons that look scary"............They ALL look scary.

Genocide generally follows Gun Confiscation, along with demonizing a group and the Democrats clearly hate one particular group. You figure it out which one.

Its embarrassing to observe the shameful, un-manly, hysteria, panic, hyper-ventilating, and sobbing paralysis of LaPierre an d the NRA. I understand their European ancestral root sources suffered invasion and rape and wholesale extermination of boys and men, over 1,000 times, since mankind learned to write and record these holocausts for perpetuity . It's 2021 now and we today live in the United States with freedom. I don't see how LaPierre and the NRA insist upon behaving like they live in the 1600s Europe.

If Feinswine wants my rifles, she can have them.... bullets first.

Come and take it.

I have a lot of guns, but I kind of agree. I've always found the people that own AR-type guns to be pretty much morons. They don't do the rest of us gunowners any favors.

Americans demand the Truth about TV News wrote:

Its embarrassing to observe the shameful, un-manly, hysteria, panic, hyper-ventilating, and sobbing paralysis of LaPierre an d the NRA. I understand their European ancestral root sources suffered invasion and rape and wholesale extermination of boys and men, over 1,000 times, since mankind learned to write and record these holocausts for perpetuity . It's 2021 now and we today live in the United States with freedom. I don't see how LaPierre and the NRA insist upon behaving like they live in the 1600s Europe.

Wonder if at in any time in history since the separation of Pangea there has ever been a non-hostile handover of territory? Sounds like something a liberal would do.

Ted' wrote:

Hopefully people lose their guns in "Boating accidents"

Or start reporting some stolen now.

"Sen. Dianne Feinstein has found an awful lot of weapons that look scary -- 205, to be exact.

On Thursday, the California Democrat introduced a promised piece of legislation that would ban "military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines," a media release from her office stated. It comes on the heels of the House of Representatives passing bills that would establish a nationwide background check program. Both of these are agenda items on President Joe Biden's proposed suite of gun-control measures, along with stripping gun manufacturers from immunity from lawsuits over legally manufactured and sold firearms. "

wnd.com/2021/03/feinstein-comes-back-new-assault-weapons-bill-bans-205-guns-name/

Didnt know she was still alive.

Is she going to ban parts kits?

How about drill presses and routers?

When will reloading and general basic gun smithing be on the chopping block due to the evil and terroristic nature?

sadness... wrote:

Is she going to ban parts kits?

How about drill presses and routers?

When will reloading and general basic gun smithing be on the chopping block due to the evil and terroristic nature?

We really really need to start teaching gunsmithing at a higher level so that we would take it upon ourselves to fashion arms and ammunition.

There was aleady a company that used a computer based engineered drill to hollow out a lower receiver ( from a metal preshapened mold ) and it could do this for many different lower receivers for many different guns ( forgot the name of said company ). That was a start , as all one needed was the computer drill and the raw lower receiver mold , from then it could be fashioned into the main part of the gun ( functioning lower receiver ) while one could buy different parts to make the gun a whole at the end of the process.

Yup its all metal. What are you gonna do, ban machine shops and raw metals? 80% lowers only require a drill press.

It's like in london they tried banning knives lolol. Literally all one needs is a stone and a piece of metal and one can make a knife.

You don't think the law stifles 99% of such innovation though?

You're caught with a homemade knife, you're arrested regardless. Most people aren't going to take the chance.

brien evans wrote:

You don't think the law stifles 99% of such innovation though?

You're caught with a homemade knife, you're arrested regardless. Most people aren't going to take the chance.

I can't speak for the younger generations, but if you are familiar with tools/tooling, basic machining concepts, and even mildly mechanically inclined, nearly any yahoo could make functional and build out an ar lower.

Unfinished lowers can be had for $60-120. They have no serialization and are not controlled by the feds, no FFL, no waiting, no paperwork, ships right to your door. As long as you build them for yourself or family, no legal trouble. They can't be sold, but can be "gifted" to family, bypassing all sorts of BS; and the FBI/ATF definition of what constitutes family is ever growing lol.

jamb innn wrote:

Ted' wrote:

Hopefully people lose their guns in "Boating accidents"

Or start reporting some stolen now.

"Sen. Dianne Feinstein has found an awful lot of weapons that look scary -- 205, to be exact.

On Thursday, the California Democrat introduced a promised piece of legislation that would ban "military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines," a media release from her office stated. It comes on the heels of the House of Representatives passing bills that would establish a nationwide background check program. Both of these are agenda items on President Joe Biden's proposed suite of gun-control measures, along with stripping gun manufacturers from immunity from lawsuits over legally manufactured and sold firearms. "

wnd.com/2021/03/feinstein-comes-back-new-assault-weapons-bill-bans-205-guns-name/

Didnt know she was still alive.

Lol yeah.

I've been wondering why liberal states don't follow the same Texas abortion mechanism to ban weapons? If the Supreme Court rules it's legal, then CA could say, "anyone who sells, purchases, or owns a gun can be sued for $10,000 in civil court." This cannot be blocked by the Constitution because CA is not banning firearms. It's simply saying you can be sued by your neighbors for $10,000 if you own one. Exact same structure and perfectly legal if the Supreme Court rules the Texas abortion law is legal.

sbeefyk2 wrote:

I've been wondering why liberal states don't follow the same Texas abortion mechanism to ban weapons? If the Supreme Court rules it's legal, then CA could say, "anyone who sells, purchases, or owns a gun can be sued for $10,000 in civil court." This cannot be blocked by the Constitution because CA is not banning firearms. It's simply saying you can be sued by your neighbors for $10,000 if you own one. Exact same structure and perfectly legal if the Supreme Court rules the Texas abortion law is legal.

NooooooOOOOOOoooo! You figured it out!

Americans demand the Truth about TV News wrote:

Its embarrassing to observe the shameful, un-manly, hysteria, panic, hyper-ventilating, and sobbing paralysis of LaPierre an d the NRA. I understand their European ancestral root sources suffered invasion and rape and wholesale extermination of boys and men, over 1,000 times, since mankind learned to write and record these holocausts for perpetuity . It's 2021 now and we today live in the United States with freedom. I don't see how LaPierre and the NRA insist upon behaving like they live in the 1600s Europe.

Whoa!

Americans demand the Truth about TV News wrote:

Its embarrassing to observe the shameful, un-manly, hysteria, panic, hyper-ventilating, and sobbing paralysis of LaPierre an d the NRA. I understand their European ancestral root sources suffered invasion and rape and wholesale extermination of boys and men, over 1,000 times, since mankind learned to write and record these holocausts for perpetuity . It's 2021 now and we today live in the United States with freedom. I don't see how LaPierre and the NRA insist upon behaving like they live in the 1600s Europe.

When did your government ever go out of their way to do something that actually benefits you in the longterm? Do you really think they’re doing this with your best interest in mind? You think Feinstein woke up and thought, “wow, I’d really like to do something for the average Joe shmoe today”?

Look at the waffling and lies that are spun every single day out of DC- in every genre imaginable, mind you- Democrat or Republican. This is no different.

How did she withstand a 3000 mile journey ? Looks like she's not gonna be around much longer.

cnn.com

Feinstein's office confirms broader health complications, contradicting senator's denial | CNN Politics

Manu Raju,Jessica Dean

Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office confirmed on Thursday that the California Democrat experienced broader health complications following her shingles diagnosis, contradicting an earlier denial from the senator herself.

Link:www.cnn.com/2023/05/18/politics/dianne...