busybusy wrote:
The Unkle wrote:
Need to learn about correlation and causation?
You do realize that you cannot have causation without correlation?
And given the extreme correlation between the explosion of vaccines and of autism and these other deadly allergies that never existed before, the correlation is not causation argument holds very little water.
It's not vaccines that cause autism - it's organic food. My evidence? "extreme correlation". Undeniable. :-D
https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.f4fbb2066ca69cb15d4fed6017e052bf?rik=bT5ZxMMfukq9Jw&riu=http%3a%2f%2f2.bp.blogspot.com%2f-hCH3zudPvnU%2fUMolIlzvT3I%2fAAAAAAAAA8M%2faJV9eZO9VNA%2fs1600%2fAutism-Organic.png&ehk=JOpRwxGBlEPbpnieZSyOi9eL3o06iBF54Xxz0op1ioU%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0
You need to not cut off the the years 1986-1996 on your chart.
The relationship between the proportion of children who received the recommended vaccines by age 2 years and the prevalence of autism (AUT) or speech or language impairment (SLI) in each U.S. state from 2001 and 2007 was determined. A positive and statistically significant relationship was found: The higher the proportion of children receiving recommended vaccinations, the higher the prevalence of AUT or SLI. These results suggest that there may be a link of vaccines to autism.
In "Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism Diagnosis," published in the November 2010 issue, pages 1665-1677 in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, researchers have found an association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental reports of autism.
This research included a study among boys age 3-17 years, born before 1999, who were vaccinated for hepatitis B as neonates. Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life.