You guys are so weird. Signs don’t stop rapists from raping people. Just like they don’t stop psycho nut job from bringing guns to a music festival. Y’all are so inconsistent with your beliefs. The trans part of the article and the OP’s posts is just to elicit a reaction. A boy raped a girl. That’s a problem no matter where it occurred or what they were wearing.
Sling more mud. Weak ass cu<Ks on this board.
RunRagged wrote:
Tatar.. wrote:
The school hadn't enacted any 'policies' at the time of the assault. A meeting held was disrupted by the alleged victim's father where bathroom policy was discussed. The case is being investigated by police and because of this and because they are all minors we don't have much detail.
The policies proposed are described as 'transgender bathrooms' but in reality are 'gender-neutral' and the school wanted to renovate them and make them more private like having a sink and mirror inside a fully enclosed stall.
It would make sexual assault less likely in all honesty but for some people that isn't nearly as important as bashing trans people.
How does making previously female-only communal toilets, locker rooms and other similar facilities mixed-sex - which is what the obfuscating term "gender neutral" means - "make sexual assaults less likely"?
Since the vast majority (over 95%) of people who commit sexual assaults are males, and those they sexually assault are most often female (85%), I don't see how opening up female toilets, locker rooms, change rooms, to males etc will lower the rates of sexual assault - or can & will make girls & women safer. On the contrary, this seems to be throwing safeguarding for half the human race out the window entirely.
Expressing concerns about policies that threaten to diminish the safety, dignity and privacy of girls & women in places outside our homes where we have to remove part or all of our clothes and are especially vulnerable to sexual harassment, voyeurism, exhibitionism, predation and assault, is not the same as "bashing trans people."
If some people have gender identities that make them uncomfortable using the single-sex facilities for their sex, then the solution is to create additional third spaces that can be used by persons of all gender identities of either sex safely and with dignity. But it's not fair to make sweeping changes suddenly removing single-sex provisions from girls & women at schools and other places outside the home, especially not without allowing discussion & debate, and without understanding why women of earlier generations fought and lobbied hard for separate provisions in certain limited circumstances in the first place.
Due to our different urinary anatomy, the additional reproductive functions that biology has endowed us with, the fact that we are physically weaker than males, and the fact that most males are sexually attracted to females, often powerfully, and some males are inclined to behave inappropriately and disrespectfully towards us, and some males are sexually abusive, girls & women require separate toilets from males for reasons you might not be aware of. Pointing this out isn't "bashing" anyone.
A lot of males don't want their toilets and locker rooms to become mixed-sex, either.
For you I'm pretty sure it is.
RunRagged wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
The story is a wet dream for the far right and various outlets have run with it despise there being few details. Is not even clear why the father was at the meeting or what he wants. If he wants justice for his daughter, shouldn't he be speaking with the police?
Stories like this might be a "wet dream" in your eyes, but they are nightmares for girls & women who are being told we must forfeit our right to female-only toilets, locker rooms, change rooms, hospital wards, shelters, prisons etc in order to placate all the males who nowadays are declaring they are trans.
These nightmares are especially troubling for the many girls & women who've experienced sexual assault, whether in schools or other places. Used to be, the ladies' room was a sanctuary where we could turn to in order to get away from creepy, predatory guys. But now rules are being put in place that say objecting to the presence of males in previously female-only intimate spaces is bigotry, hate and "transphobia."
But thanks for likening what's going on to "a wet dream." Nothing illustrates that the demands of trans activists impinges upon girls' & women's rights to safety, privacy & dignity quite so well as a guy bringing up penises, male ejaculation and semen to make his point.
They didn't say it was a wet dream in their eyes. Reading comprehension matters.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
I don't believe any school employees monitor people going into bathrooms. Any guy could hang out and go in when the coast was clear, no skirt required. He could just hide in a stall until a victim arrived.
Once again out of your depth…. A few posts ago, you’re asking for details about the rape of a minor? What do you expect, a video? Are you so desperate to deny this poor girl’s trauma that you’ll endlessly move the goalposts to preserve your ideology?
It’s quite common for there to be a faculty or staff member seated nearby a bathroom or right at it. Many schools have specified ‘duty’ periods for faculty for just this purpose. For contact tracing in schools, it was quite common to limit the bathroom to 1-2 students at a time for just this purpose. Why don’t you stick with what you know?
RunRagged wrote:
A lot of males don't want their toilets and locker rooms to become mixed-sex, either.
If I had my way, I wouldn’t share the bathroom with anyone… ever…. But if I have to, you’re right. I’d much rather share with men than women.
I think you make a lot of good points why we should designate bathrooms by sex. Unfortunately the world has lost it’s mind in an attempt to protect the rights of 0.4% of the population at the expense of 54%. It’s all so lefties like SDSU and Precious Roy can boost their moral vanity and virtue signal about how evolved they are. It’s not like I think it should be open season on trans people. They are deserving of the same protections as everyone else. The thing is, the overwhelmingly majority of the need could be taken care of one extra bathroom with two stalls and lockers etc. But the idiot lefties feel that this is exclusionary — and somehow (even though its not true) that would be worse than being physically violated.
The other thing is that there was a lot that I hated about the implementation of Title IX. A lot of men’s non-revenue athletes got f’d over by that - quite a few revenue-generating male athletes too. But the price was paid and something great happened. Now we’re going to abandon it that quickly?
Disko Eric wrote:
You guys are so weird. Signs don’t stop rapists from raping people. Just like they don’t stop psycho nut job from bringing guns to a music festival. Y’all are so inconsistent with your beliefs. The trans part of the article and the OP’s posts is just to elicit a reaction. A boy raped a girl. That’s a problem no matter where it occurred or what they were wearing.
Sling more mud. Weak ass cu<Ks on this board.
I think I love you
dullard wrote:
They didn't say it was a wet dream in their eyes. Reading comprehension matters.
To use that phrase in this context? At best a disgusting troll maneuver - at worst, speaks to some inner issues.
RunRagged wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
The story is a wet dream for the far right and various outlets have run with it despise there being few details. Is not even clear why the father was at the meeting or what he wants. If he wants justice for his daughter, shouldn't he be speaking with the police?
Stories like this might be a "wet dream" in your eyes, but they are nightmares for girls & women who are being told we must forfeit our right to female-only toilets, locker rooms, change rooms, hospital wards, shelters, prisons etc in order to placate all the males who nowadays are declaring they are trans.
These nightmares are especially troubling for the many girls & women who've experienced sexual assault, whether in schools or other places. Used to be, the ladies' room was a sanctuary where we could turn to in order to get away from creepy, predatory guys. But now rules are being put in place that say objecting to the presence of males in previously female-only intimate spaces is bigotry, hate and "transphobia."
But thanks for likening what's going on to "a wet dream." Nothing illustrates that the demands of trans activists impinges upon girls' & women's rights to safety, privacy & dignity quite so well as a guy bringing up penises, male ejaculation and semen to make his point.
Nothing has been proven and the story makes no sense. The articles are reacting to a story of a guy putting on a skirt to take advantage of school transgender policies to rape a school girl at a HS. Bathrooms aren't policed so it didn't matter if he was wearing a skirt and most HS girls don't wear skirts anyway. There are no details. Did it happen during school hours? Did the school call 911 right away? Did they tell her she was imagining things and the father called the police after she came home? Does he want the school district to shout from the mountain tops that there was a rape at the school? Why would the school want to cover up the incident? Do they believe the assault occurred off campus. Is the father suing them?
The thread title includes "Girl raped in bathroom by guy in a skirt" and the reaction of some posters is that if transgender females weren't allowed in the girls bathrooms the assault wouldn't have occurred. I seriously doubt that's the case.
RosietheCuban wrote:
Adultintheroom wrote:
How the actual fck did you draw that conclusion from what the poster typed?
Baffling.
How did you not?
Disko Eric already replied to this. You are wrong.
It’s bad enough that Coevett called this one ridiculously wrong, don’t jump in along side his stupidity. Reading comprehension matters.
Precious Roy wrote:
So, right wingers are now down with "believe women" as long as the perpetrator is trans?
The question of belief/disbelief is not on the table. The perp confessed about two separate incidents.
This post was removed.
Disko Eric wrote:
This will be a shock so please take a seat. Men. Women. Trans. Gender fluid. All colors. Rape people. Whether this boy had a skirt or is trans does not matter. You’ll also be shocked to know that trans people have been using the bathroom of their gender since indoor plumbing was invented. You guys really need to get out more.
The school board covered up a rape. I don't care if it was a horse raping your grandmother, don't cover it up. Got that schmuck.
This post was removed.
llort_vbo wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
I don't believe any school employees monitor people going into bathrooms. Any guy could hang out and go in when the coast was clear, no skirt required. He could just hide in a stall until a victim arrived.
Once again out of your depth…. A few posts ago, you’re asking for details about the rape of a minor? What do you expect, a video? Are you so desperate to deny this poor girl’s trauma that you’ll endlessly move the goalposts to preserve your ideology?
It’s quite common for there to be a faculty or staff member seated nearby a bathroom or right at it. Many schools have specified ‘duty’ periods for faculty for just this purpose. For contact tracing in schools, it was quite common to limit the bathroom to 1-2 students at a time for just this purpose. Why don’t you stick with what you know?
It still makes no sense. You say that people would be watching so they see the skirt and wave him in. He then rapes a girl knowing that he'll been seen by the same people when he comes out and of course he had no concern about another student entering the bathroom during the assault.
This post was removed.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
1) It still makes no sense.
2) You say that people would be watching so they see the skirt and wave him in. He then rapes a girl knowing that he'll been seen by the same people when he comes out and of course he had no concern about another student entering the bathroom during the assault.
1) Stay on topic for one minute. Do you not have one iota of intellectual integrity? Just admit when you’re wrong and move on.
2) I didn’t say whether people were waving anyone in or out, I just told you that it is more than likely that an adult was nearby when both went in to the bathroom.
And yes, crimes happen all the time just like you describe. It’s not common, but among hardened criminals, it’s also not unusual. The heartbreaking thing about this is that rapists who are that brazen have likely gotten away with it multiple times and this can lead to a further recklessness and a sense of invincibility. The fact is that the vast majority of rapes aren’t reported, very few that are reported lead to charges, and a minuscule few end in conviction. No one would know that better than a person who would do this. As a matter of fact, they might get a special thrill out of this particular circumstance.
Cameras and possibly faculty/staff/students were near that bathroom and likely saw who went in and who came out. This is crucial evidence for establishing a timeline of any possible crime.
RunRagged wrote:
dullard wrote:
They didn't say it was a wet dream in their eyes. Reading comprehension matters.
Well duh. Thanks for bringing that to my attention, mate. Dunno how I managed to make it through life to this juncture without you.
The point I was making that seems to have flown over your head is that on a thread about a report of a 14-year-old girl being raped and sodomized, a male poster tried to discredit the story and throw shade on anyone who feels sympathy for the girl by portraying us as bigoted right-wing cranks and likening the whole saga to a sexual occurrence that happens to males at night involving involuntary ejaculation of semen from the penis.
Calling an extremely violent, horrific sex crime allegedly committed by a teenage boy on a girl of 14 and the controversy it has generated "a wet dream" struck me as a particularly vulgar, inappropriate expression of male sexism and contempt for the female victim. Even for Lets Run, it seemed a "low blow," so to speak.
Yes, rapes are a horrific crime and unfortunately they frequently occur. The only reason this one is singled out is because it allegedly involved a boy in a skirt, which makes it catnip for people that have been ranting about transgender females using public bathrooms.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
RunRagged wrote:
Well duh. Thanks for bringing that to my attention, mate. Dunno how I managed to make it through life to this juncture without you.
The point I was making that seems to have flown over your head is that on a thread about a report of a 14-year-old girl being raped and sodomized, a male poster tried to discredit the story and throw shade on anyone who feels sympathy for the girl by portraying us as bigoted right-wing cranks and likening the whole saga to a sexual occurrence that happens to males at night involving involuntary ejaculation of semen from the penis.
Calling an extremely violent, horrific sex crime allegedly committed by a teenage boy on a girl of 14 and the controversy it has generated "a wet dream" struck me as a particularly vulgar, inappropriate expression of male sexism and contempt for the female victim. Even for Lets Run, it seemed a "low blow," so to speak.
Yes, rapes are a horrific crime and unfortunately they frequently occur. The only reason this one is singled out is because it allegedly involved a boy in a skirt, which makes it catnip for people that have been ranting about transgender females using public bathrooms.
Actually, the primary reason this case is attracting attention is because the transphile School Board and Superintendent lied to the victim's father in a public meeting by publicly denying any assault occurred and then sought through proxies to demean the father and push him over the edge to the point they had him arrested and now has a criminal record that will affect his employment opportunities for the rest of his life. The gulag archipelago can be found in NOVA. Hopefully the father sues the pants off all of the officials involved to the point they will need to wear a table cloth as a skirt.
This post was removed.
Here’s the facts of the case.
The boy raped the girl in the restroom.
The school called the police.
The boy was arrested and was scheduled to have his trial this month, but it was delayed when he assaulted another girl in an empty classroom so they could charge him with both crimes at the same time.
The district never covered anything up.
The district can’t talk about the details of the case because they are minors.
The father showed up to the school board meeting shouting hate speech about trannies; which has nothing to do with anything.
He was arrested for that.
Can you blame him? Absolutely not. If someone raped my freshman daughter I’d be out to break every bone in an accident.