bigmig19 wrote:
FastTuohy wrote:
Thanks - forgot about that - clearly something amiss with the course measurement
I said she ran low 19s, and she did (and mid 19s)? I didnt say it was at the nationals. These are very very exceptional times for last year, why dismiss them? Just sayin, why try so hard to dismiss her? She was couple sec slower than Donaghue not long after arriving on campus. Would it be some sort of bizarre upset for her to run faster this year than people she was faster than last year? You never know, sometimes you need an additional year after injury to recalibrate, but she has had some eye opening improvement in 2 years. Tuohy was the whole freshman story last year, but Dudek was tracking to be top 3 at nationals probably easily beating KT.
I have in no way dismissed Dudek. In fact, in another thread I wrote the below saying I thought she was expected to be in the top 15. I think if she is healthy she and Heymach are a very strong 1-2. Others in the linked thread have questioned her.
"I have no idea how fit Starliper is this year. But 2019 NXN was a bad race for her. The next week she was barely beat by Dudek at FL, 6 seconds off the 35 year old course record. If she is at full strength she could easily be in top 15 - just as many thought Dudek would be last Spring (not knowing the injury - and where Donaghu was)."
I also wrote this in the same thread
"Dug a little more into the teams, and ahead of the first coaches polls rankings coming out soon I see:
1) BYU - stronger Orton + some improvement across the board - returning champs get the nod
2) NC State - if Tuohy and Clairemonte are stronger and they get a strong 5th out of Shaw/Starliper/Rauber/Quarzo or whoever could be right there with BYU. Assumes Steelman and Chmiel remain strong.
3) Arkansas - a team of Gear, Jolly (nee Morris), Thorvaldson, Hyde and Gray (if she returns) is pretty solid without the Indoor meet just prior
4) Stanford - Heymach and Dudek could be strong 1-2, and Lawson. Jenks, Aragon may improve but still look out of top 3.
5) New Mexico - assumes returners run better than they did in March. If there are strong transferees could move up. Will see at Joe Piane early Oct vs some strong competition.
6) N Carolina - if freshmen Brown and Masciarelli run well they should move up a lot from last year.
7) Michigan State - demonstrated last year they are solid if not great. Could be a little higher but probably not in top 4. Magness placed high at 5,000 Outdoors."
Your suggestion was she would beat Orton which I thought was a stretch - especially this year coming off an injury. Tuohy was hardly the whole freshman story last year as she did not run competitively until February, and then was running pretty mediocre times until she came up with the AA finish at Stillwater (but well behind Donaghu).
I cited the NCAA championship times to give a perspective on what the best have run each year - mid 19s generally. Very clearly the low 19s effort (by many) at the Pac 12 meet was a short course - note how fast the times were vs what they ran in Stillwater.
https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=10797243&page=1https://static.pac-12.com/sports/cross-country/2020-championships/2020_Pac-12_XC_results_WOMEN.pdf