Yusef Scumm. wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
I think you should educate yourself on what the tampering charge really is, and what is on the banned substance list.
You’re mincing words, boot licker.
The report has been handed down and upheld. The wording clearly states why Shady Al will not tarnish the sport any longer.
I know I can buy L- carnitine at the local food store. I remember in the 80s, it was touted as a fat burner by the bodybuilding community. Lies…..
Maybe the key is injecting it? Either way, the powers that be have spoken and your disgraced idol is finished. Ha. Ha.
You started by asking questions to which apparently you already predetermined you knew the answers.
We aren’t disagreeing on the opinions, but you are just getting the facts wrong.
The CAS announcement didn’t go into details, so I’m going off the AAA Panel report 2 years ago.
Salazar sent an email, instructing his athletes that when asked if they had infusions, to say no, because, according to Salazar, the L-Carnitine infusions are really injections. USADA argued that that was tampering, and won.
L-Carnitine is incidental. What the WADA code cares about in this tampering charge is that Salazar sent an email with instructions, attempting to tamper with the doping control process. What the WADA code cares about with infusions is a limit of 50ml of any liquid, regardless of contents, over a 6-hour period (not given in the ordinary course of medical need or trauma). This is because cyclists used it often to thin their blood before blood tests. What the WADA code does not care about is ingesting L-Carnitine, in any amount, that doesn’t involve a banned method.
What is tragic about the email:
- The infusions were really infusions
- The distinction between infusions and injections does not matter — both are subject to the same WADA limit
- (Allegedly) no athlete was ever asked about infusions by a DCO — no process was actually tampered
- Nevertheless, sending an email fits the criteria of attempted tampering and results in a nominal 2-year penalty.
According to the WADA code defintions of “doping” and “intentional”, Salazar is considered by the WADA code as an “intentional doper” for sending an email which had no impact.
But I will correct myself. I was actually wrong to say nobody cares — Salazar cared a great deal about the potential performance effects of this completely WADA legal amino acid.