Fred kerley 19.79

Probably my favorite sprinter right now, he doesn’t shy away from competition and delivers on the biggest stage

My favorite sprinter this year. After the Olympics he said he would run a 400 again this year, and the Men’s 400 is a Diamond League event in Brussels. I’m wondering if a win there would get him into the Diamond League final, where perhaps he could chase a 2021 Worlds autobid if he were to win the 400m Diamond League final.

honestly the balls on this guy to step down in an olympic year. awesome to see that risk rewarded.

scared money don't make money, right.

jumpers knee wrote:

He's got very solid marks for every distance now.

If you combine the 3, the 100/200 and 400 is there anyone outside of Michael Johnson with a better three combined marks?

Michael Norman- 9.86, 19.70, 43.45. But Kerley has the medals so it's clear who the better runner is.

WVN is sub-20 and sub-10 too.

William Faulkner is 2nd Rate wrote:

Michael Norman- 9.86, 19.70, 43.45. But Kerley has the medals so it's clear who the better runner is.

WVN is sub-20 and sub-10 too.

They have remarkably similar PRs ...

Norman/Kerley

9.86/9.84

19.70/19.79

43.45/43,64

Johnson

10.89/19.32/43.18

Sally Vixxxxxxxxens wrote:

William Faulkner is 2nd Rate wrote:

Michael Norman- 9.86, 19.70, 43.45. But Kerley has the medals so it's clear who the better runner is.

WVN is sub-20 and sub-10 too.

They have remarkably similar PRs ...

Norman/Kerley

9.86/9.84

19.70/19.79

43.45/43,64

Johnson

10.89/19.32/43.18

WVN

9.94/19.84/43.03

9.84

19.79

43.64

I’m pretty sure this combination puts him fifth in the combined sprinter rankings, behind Bolt, Johnson, Norman and van Niekerk

Sally Vixxxxxxxxens wrote:

William Faulkner is 2nd Rate wrote:

Michael Norman- 9.86, 19.70, 43.45. But Kerley has the medals so it's clear who the better runner is.

WVN is sub-20 and sub-10 too.

They have remarkably similar PRs ...

Norman/Kerley

9.86/9.84

19.70/19.79

43.45/43,64

Johnson

10.89/19.32/43.18

Typo: 10.09, not 10.89 :)

William Faulkner is 2nd Rate wrote:

Sally Vixxxxxxxxens wrote:

They have remarkably similar PRs ...

Norman/Kerley

9.86/9.84

19.70/19.79

43.45/43,64

Johnson

10.89/19.32/43.18

Typo: 10.09, not 10.89 :)

Yes, thanks - my bad.

If Newman was his normal self he’d of run 19.5 on these tracks. What a year to not be your best.

Coleman as well lol. He’s got to be pissed sitting at home. On these tracks with the super spikes he could put a scare into Bolts 9.59. Damn wish he would of been able to run this year. The women are going two tenths faster than they ever have. That’d put Coleman in the 9.5s easily.

Newmannn!!

Coleman will be running in the 9.9s when comes back. He'll effort his way back into 9.7 high eventually. That's how his career will go. If he sticks w/ it, he'll probably get some more medals at Olys and Worlds.

William Faulkner is 2nd Rate wrote:

Coleman will be running in the 9.9s when comes back. He'll effort his way back into 9.7 high eventually. That's how his career will go. If he sticks w/ it, he'll probably get some more medals at Olys and Worlds.

No coleman will come back with a 9.6 and win worlds. He's been training to maintain his fitness I dont think he will come back rusty. I could be wrong though, but he was only gone for two years not 4 and he's not coming back from an injury.

paris2024hawk wrote:

William Faulkner is 2nd Rate wrote:

Coleman will be running in the 9.9s when comes back. He'll effort his way back into 9.7 high eventually. That's how his career will go. If he sticks w/ it, he'll probably get some more medals at Olys and Worlds.

No coleman will come back with a 9.6 and win worlds. He's been training to maintain his fitness I dont think he will come back rusty. I could be wrong though, but he was only gone for two years not 4 and he's not coming back from an injury.

Is Coleman off the drugs or using more than ever?

And kerley is clearly a doper.

Kerley is the man. My favorite athlete in T&F right now

William Faulkner is 2nd Rate wrote:

Coleman will be running in the 9.9s when comes back. He'll effort his way back into 9.7 high eventually. That's how his career will go. If he sticks w/ it, he'll probably get some more medals at Olys and Worlds.

Not without drugs he won't.

paris2024hawk wrote:

William Faulkner is 2nd Rate wrote:

Coleman will be running in the 9.9s when comes back. He'll effort his way back into 9.7 high eventually. That's how his career will go. If he sticks w/ it, he'll probably get some more medals at Olys and Worlds.

No coleman will come back with a 9.6 and win worlds. He's been training to maintain his fitness I dont think he will come back rusty. I could be wrong though, but he was only gone for two years not 4 and he's not coming back from an injury.

Is he coming back with or without the PED. Without PED he will only run 9.8

Was Coleman running with the "super spikes" before his ban? He could come back and drop some ridiculous times.