Can those who have used similarly cushioned (by forefoot stack height) shoes but with different heel drops (zero/low vs high) explain how running feels different in the two? Specifically, in your experience,
1) Did switching to either one affect injury rate or location of injury?
2) Did one feel like it stretched some portions of the leg more than the other?
3) Did switching to either one affect your form and if so how?
For context, I’ve tried (1) modestly cushioned shoes with modest heel drop (6mm); (2) maximalist shoes with high heel drop (10mm); and (3) minimalist shoes with no heel drop; but have never tried (4) well cushioned shoes with zero/low heel drop. I’m trying to better understand whether or why I should have #4 in my rotation.
I see a clear difference between #1, #2 and #3 above in how much my feet can feel the ground simply because of the different levels of cushioning, but don’t have a good sense of whether or what difference heel drop makes. My natural comfortable running form feels like textbook form to me: my legs feel like they are almost always behind me when I’m running, and I land on the ball of my feet or midfoot but rarely put much pressure or impact on my heels. Could that be why I can’t seem to feel heel drop differences?