burnout, fade away wrote:
trees wrote:
Same coach / training group as Bromell.
But he's a righteous and godly man of God.
Anti Christian bigot.
burnout, fade away wrote:
trees wrote:
Same coach / training group as Bromell.
But he's a righteous and godly man of God.
Anti Christian bigot.
Bigot does not mean what you think it means.
a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group
This might better describe you.
nznn wrote:
Bigot does not mean what you think it means.
a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group
This might better describe you.
"Anti-christian bigot"
Using the term bigot to, literally, conform to the definition you posted by determining a perceived bigotry based on membership or affiliation to a religious group.
Can you not read?
Must have been tested within a day of injection.
Will be more than a few worried athletes and withdrawing will put a target on their back unless they are at the airport when they withdraw.
Surprised more not positive for growth and other assumed “ safe “ drugs.
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
Surprised that's all she TESTed for...
https://www.ktsm.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/38/2021/07/Blessing-Okagbare-1.jpg?w=2560&h=1440&crop=1
Who's that guy in the middle?
EPO as well. Hahaha
https://twitter.com/aiu_athletics/status/1446026602203258883
The most surprising issue here is that the sample leading to the hGH positive was collected while she was in Slovakia, and the EPO one while in Nigeria. Both were OOC.
Nigeria is her country, but she only goes back there when she is forced to (in this case, for her Olympic trials).
We are talking about a sprinter that has been living round year mainly in Texas/Florida for more than a decade, she is a former UTEP alumni.
The question here is that, did she began to dope this year at age 33 ? If not, how did she manage to escape doping controls while living in her various for so many years ?
The most likely explanation is that while in the US, she was always on alert, and careful. She probably developped various schemes and protocols that allowed her stay on her guard. However outside of her base she became sloppy and was caught off.
It is very curious that an experienced sprinter who has been on the circuit for years suddenly got caught twice in one months in two very differently places than were she is usually located...
Or testing in the usa and Jamaica is not worth anything and easy to get by. Only when non usatf (Jamaica) orgs do the testing someone can actually be positive.
sayyestonepotism wrote:
Or testing in the usa and Jamaica is not worth anything and easy to get by. Only when non usatf (Jamaica) orgs do the testing someone can actually be positive.
+1
I think it's also worth noting they've also charged her with failing to cooperate. I imagine they are pushing her hard to rat out others if other are involved.
rojo wrote:
I think it's also worth noting they've also charged her with failing to cooperate. I imagine they are pushing her hard to rat out others if other are involved.
https://athleticsweekly.com/featured/blessing-okagbare-charged-with-use-of-two-banned-substances-1039950322/
Rule 12 says that you must hand over all devises.
This applies to all who do the sport or are support personal.
This is draconian beyond belief.
A court would normally have to give permission for this.
Don’t think this is set out in the wada code.
Big big brother beyond imagination.
Chip Chipperson wrote:
burnout, fade away wrote:
But he's a righteous and godly man of God.
Anti Christian bigot.
No. Just plain idiot.
By the logic of those comments, the actions of a wrongdoer whose actions you have no control or knowledge of and are completely independent to your own (because your body is not the body of another person body !!!), are somehow the same as yours.
Support staff can be forced to hand over all their computers, phones, diaries ,note pads and anything else AIU desire.
If you say no then banned you are and if I read it all correctly no appeal.
sanootage wrote:
Support staff can be forced to hand over all their computers, phones, diaries ,note pads and anything else AIU desire.
If you say no then banned you are and if I read it all correctly no appeal.
Rule of law demolished .
sanootage wrote:
Support staff can be forced to hand over all their computers, phones, diaries ,note pads and anything else AIU desire.
If you say no then banned you are and if I read it all correctly no appeal.
Appalling breach of privacy rights.
Breach of wada code.
Human rights gone.
This effects everyone.
AIU can start an investigation and there can be no challenge or no court you can go to to get protection.
The definition of support staff/ personnel is so wide that you should be horrified.
zxcvczxv wrote:
This is one of the least surprising, but welcome, results I have seen. I was just thinking after watching her prelim just how masculine she looked and I was thinking either DSD or testosterone. I was actually looking up whether she'd been linked to a DSD. It turned out to be HGH. It might be other things as well.
Perhaps also has a Y chromosome?
Certainly wasn't a blessing.
sanootage wrote:
sanootage wrote:
Support staff can be forced to hand over all their computers, phones, diaries ,note pads and anything else AIU desire.
If you say no then banned you are and if I read it all correctly no appeal.
Appalling breach of privacy rights.
Breach of wada code.
Human rights gone.
This effects everyone.
AIU can start an investigation and there can be no challenge or no court you can go to to get protection.
The definition of support staff/ personnel is so wide that you should be horrified.
Has this not been spotted by those with any interest in human rights.
sanootage wrote:
Support staff can be forced to hand over all their computers, phones, diaries ,note pads and anything else AIU desire.
If you say no then banned you are and if I read it all correctly no appeal.
Seriously? What is your source for that?
casual obsever wrote:
sanootage wrote:
Support staff can be forced to hand over all their computers, phones, diaries ,note pads and anything else AIU desire.
If you say no then banned you are and if I read it all correctly no appeal.
Seriously? What is your source for that?
Rule 12 in world athletics Doping rules
Read it ! Please.