Why does everything have to be ranked?
Why does everything have to be ranked?
1) Blue Origin
2) Space X
3) Virgin Galactic
alphabetical.
vaIjean wrote:
healterseltzer wrote:
Sounds like some frustration relating to ego and cognitive dissonance.
It's okay to absorb new facts, even if the media and academia never mention such facts.
We've all be tricked, all our lives. The least we can do is have the humility to admit it instead of digging in and doubling down on our misguided foundational beliefs.
I like facts and I have no problem reading them. It's just difficult to follow the thread of your argument through all of the links. While I agree that the rich and powerful play by different rules than laypeople do, they're still just meat people with meat plans. Not all coincidences are connected, and I tend to be skeptical of people who think they are. Are you saying that SpaceX/etc are covers for some sort of demonic pizzagate shenanigans?
Jeffrey Epstein was Pizzagate. Your "don't ask, don't tell" intentional blindness about pedophilia and occultism in elite circles isn't sophisticated as you'd like to think. You're not being smart when you ask zero questions about Jeffrey Epstein and the fact that all his close friends run the world. Gates, Clintons, Trump, Bezos, Musk, the Google founders, etc etc.
You pat yourself on the back for refusing to consider that our top politicians and mega-billionaires are ALL willingly blackmailed through sexual degeneracy and other occult rituals.
healterseltzer wrote:
"Don't ask, don't tell" would describe your interest in understanding the power dynamics of the USA.
That's a bit of an ad hominem, but okay.
You don't want to hear that billionaires/trillionaires control the government through the private Federal Reserve banking system, and you don't want to hear that these billionaires/trillionaires run the intelligence agencies that artificially create monopolies with sexaully blackmailed/occultically initiated figureheads in charge of them.
I'm with you up until the occult stuff.
You want to believe that Warren Buffett is just REALLY smart about predicting markets, and that Jeff Bezos and Walmart have a monopoly over the US economy because of their independent business skills.
Well, sort of. History has to pick a winner, and those happen to be the winners it chose, but obviously luck and business savvy aren't the only things that matter. Knowledge of how to work with/around bureaucracy is a skill by itself, and the people/orgs you mention clearly have that skill. Are suggesting they gained their success by some mystical method? Is that why you keep mentioning the occult?
healterseltzer wrote:
Jeffrey Epstein was Pizzagate. Your "don't ask, don't tell" intentional blindness about pedophilia and occultism in elite circles isn't sophisticated as you'd like to think. You're not being smart when you ask zero questions about Jeffrey Epstein and the fact that all his close friends run the world. Gates, Clintons, Trump, Bezos, Musk, the Google founders, etc etc.
You pat yourself on the back for refusing to consider that our top politicians and mega-billionaires are ALL willingly blackmailed through sexual degeneracy and other occult rituals.
I'm happy to consider it and ask questions, but I don't see why it has to be that way or how the occult plays into it. You're welcome to explain it to me, though.
"No, I think they want to be government and run shadow operations, obviously without the democracy part. Look at the infrastructure Amazon invests in - Web Services, Lockers, Alexa, Ring."
Amazon never turned a profit until the CIA paid Amazon/Bezos Billions of dollars to run some cloud services for them.
And then Bezos buys the Washington Post, which even Congress proved was central component of the CIA's Project Mockingbird propaganda network.
So when the CIA funded Bezos/Amazon gets into Cloud services for the public, and spying devices like Alexa and Ring, that's not Bezos trying to replace the CIA, that's much more likely the CIA using Amazon/Bezos to spy on Americans while keeping the CIA's hands clean.
The banking trillionaire families that we can't even name own the banking system, and they created the CIA themselves in 1947.
"Billionaires" like Bezos/Musk/Gates are simply front men for the shadow government.
Ever notice that all these high profile billionaires leave most/all of their money to CIA-connected "charities" like the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation?
"The Giving Pledge" is nothing more than a little trick to hide the fact that all these dudes are intelligence agency assets, and that the money isn't really theirs.
https://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/video/worlds-wealthiest-donate-billions-giving-pledge-31428787
Ever notice how the career arcs of these billionaires begin and continue as if lifted by angel wings?
You really think Zuckerberg was just THAT smart? And that it's a coincidence that former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers (Jeffrey Epstein's close friend) just happened to be president of Harvard, and just happened to help Zuckerberg elbow aside the Winklevoss twins?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3JtmZugzl4
https://twitter.com/c0nc0rdance/status/1282496865792151554
We all hate super rich tech billionaires, we're just arguing who's pulling who's strings 😂
Power is won and maintained by the most organized individuals, with the strongest and most unbreakable bonds.
The most effective form of organization, and thus the most powerful, is the type of organization that is invisible to the masses.
And the strongest type of bond, besides blood relation (which is visible to the public), is mutual blackmail between accomplices.
Secret organizations have secret initiation rights, and they demand blackmail material to join.
Notice that NONE of Jeffrey Epstein's many powerful friends EVER admitted that they ever saw ANYTHING.
The fastest way to a position of power for an ambitious person with no connections is to become blackmailed by honey trap operations like Epstein was running for the intelligence community.
A person who has been compromised by Epstein's hidden cameras is ASSURED to be a reliable operative for the hidden, plausibly deniable power structure that rules us.
It's no different in China, or North Korea, or Iran, or the Vatican, or the UK. Systematic blackmail of the ambitious, and plausibly deniable power networks that NOBODY confesses about.
Just a bunch of "individuals" living the charmed life.
Untrue - Amazon turned a profit a decade before that.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/2575106/amazon-records-first-profitable-year-in-its-history.htmlOhh so you're a Qtard! As I suspected. Yes, that link is there, but consider the possibility that Bezos bought WaPo simply because it's a huge and profitable news outlet.
I'm on board with you here - not a fan of Alexa and Ring.
If you can't name them, how do you know they created the CIA?
I have never noticed this no. But by the sound of it, I imagine any charity I can name is probably connected to the CIA in your mind.
Nor have I ever noticed this. Bezos, Zuck, Musk, etc have been plugging away at their careers for decades. Musk and Bezos have been at it for almost thirty years. It's not like they sprang up from nowhere.
[quote]You really think Zuckerberg was just THAT smart? And that it's a coincidence that former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers (Jeffrey Epstein's close friend) just happened to be president of Harvard, and just happened to help Zuckerberg elbow aside the Winklevoss twins? [quote]
What I think is more likely is that the ultra-rich tend to congregate on account of their shared interests rather than the other way around. Honestly though, I just don't see webs connecting everything like you do. Stop reading so much Q.
Tatar... wrote:
We all hate super rich tech billionaires, we're just arguing who's pulling who's strings 😂
True!
I still haven't figured out the point of this high profile space race between the Five Eyes billionaires.
But I do know that the reason the US government suddenly started talking about UFOs is probably to distract the public from investigation into the origins of the Covid 19 virus.
Because that global Covid investigation is rapidly shifting from Wuhon to Ft Detrick, Maryland.
Recall that the day after Senator Rand Paul started grilling Dr Fauci about the origins of Covid 19, the US government and the media apparatus did an IMMEDIATE AND COMPLETE 180, and started screaming that Covid probably came from the Wuhan lab.
And the people central to this sudden and relentless messaging/propaganda campaign were mostly THE SAME LITTLE NEOCON CABAL that dragged us into the Iraq War in 2003. Douglas Feith's son, NYT propaganda partner of Judith Miller, Michael Gordon, and other familiar names.
They even dragged out their most slick covert propagandist, Jon Liebowitz Stewart (whose brother ran NYSE) onto the Colbert show to push the Covid = Wuhan narrative.
All of this was an effort to divert attention from US laboratories, and Neocon operatives.
Remember when Ft Detrick ANTHRAX was unleashed on Senators and journalists who opposed the Iraq Invasion? Remember how they tried blaming like 3 different scientists for the Anthrax mail attacks?
Yeah well, they never did tag the right guy, and the right network of operatives.
https://www.corbettreport.com/911suspects/#baer"Ohh so you're a Qtard! As I suspected. "
Q was a limited hangout operation, a term you're blissfully unfamiliar with. "Don't ask, don't tell" is your preferred defense mechanism against the harsh realities of the world.
Why Amazon’s Collaboration With the CIA Is So Ominous — and Vulnerable
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-amazons-collaboration_b_4824854
...Apparently the CIA agrees. The agency gave Amazon the contract for $600 million even though it wasn’t the lowest bid.
Amazon’s trajectory into the CIA’s spooky arms may be a bit more than just corporate eagerness to land a lucrative contract. In late 2010 — amid intense public interest in documents that WikiLeaks was posting to illuminate U.S. actions overseas — Amazon took a notable step. As the Guardian reported at the time, Amazon “pulled the plug on hosting the whistleblowing website in reaction to heavy political pressure.”
It didn’t take much for Amazon to cave. “The company announced it was cutting WikiLeaks off ... only 24 hours after being contacted by the staff of Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate’s committee on homeland security,” the Guardian noted.
In view of Amazon’s eagerness to dump the WikiLeaks site at the behest of U.S. government officials, what else might the Amazon hierarchy be willing to do? Amazon maintains a humongous trove of detailed information about hundreds of millions of people. Are we to believe that the CIA and other intelligence agencies have no interest in Amazon’s data?
Project Azorian was a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) project to recover the sunken Soviet submarine K-129 from the Pacific Ocean floor in 1974, using the purpose-built ship Hughes Glomar Explorer. The 1968 sinking of K-129 occurred approximately 1,600 miles (2,600 km) northwest of Hawaii. Project Azorian was one of the most complex, expensive, and secretive intelligence operations of the Cold War at a cost of about $800 million, or $4 billion today.
Billionaire businessman Howard Hughes – whose companies were already contractors on numerous classified US military weapons, aircraft and satellite contracts[citation needed] – agreed to lend his name to the project to support the cover story that the ship was mining manganese nodules from the ocean floor, but Hughes and his companies had no actual involvement in the project.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Azorian#Building_Glomar_Explorer,_and_its_cover_story
healterseltzer wrote:
Q was a limited hangout operation, a term you're blissfully unfamiliar with. "Don't ask, don't tell" is your preferred defense mechanism against the harsh realities of the world.
Okay. How have you not figured out how to use the quote button yet? You used it once back there, but then you immediately forgot.
And when are you gonna explain the occult stuff? I'm waiting. Honestly, the only thing I strictly disagree with you on is the occult stuff. I'm pretty down with the idea of a secret oligarchy per se.
This post was removed.
One thing to keep in mind about the occult stuff, the elites/upwardly ambitious don't necessarily believe in any of this occult stuff, it's just an excellent organizing mechanism. So your eyes might roll when you hear that the elites worship the devil, but that's not really what it is. It's just an organizational mechanism from which to exert and maintain power.
The occult also serves as a great framework for sexual deviants to bond with fellow sexual deviants, under the guise of something else, occult rituals.
So if Trump and Bill Clinton ever did a kinky ritual with Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew and some girls, any occult ritualism wouldn't be central to the misdeeds. The occultism would simply be the framework in which to partake in group debauchery.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQOEeJ1ugUonWNsZ-DooUn-3k0sF8uevp970g&usqp=CAU
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRUugJ50DWktW4SDMlGT7vtHx8UIqBBe4rw1g&usqp=CAU
Dang, that's a lot to unpack. These threads seem to go a 100 different directions and devolve into platforms for wacko conspiracy theories. But there are elements of truth in this and other posts. Dictates of preserving US superiority is causing a pivot from Russia as the bogeyman to a focus on vilifying China. Every administration needs a "bad guy" to ease resistance to changes in policy/law/sanctions/tarrifs, to justify rampant military spending, or to deflect blame for its own failures. And, in truth, China is the real threat.... to US dominance. When it comes to propping up US hegemony, facts hardly matter and disinformation is de rigueur. For example, a crypto hacker 's IP or aspects of exploited code may trace to region, such as China or Russia, and a convenient leap is made to state it's "state sponsored". Even if accurate, it ignores that the US (and Israel and Saudi etc.) have their own expansive and sophisticated state-sponsored/run cyber-hacking and cyber-spying networks. The US owns no responsibility for citizens acting as rogue hackers - but expects this of foreign countries. By that logic, we ought to sanction Nigeria... I never got the $1,000,000 I was promised for helping a prince recover an inheritance. Jon Stewart's well-rehearsed Wuhan rant on Colbert's show was odd - they claim to be friends and Colbert's stance on Covid origins/blame isn't at all aligned. Seems a network Executive dictated that appearance.
This post was removed.
Huh, it’s always those pesky Jews! It’s a shame that the Nazis didn’t manage to finish them off. Do you think the occultists would let me join? I’m not into kids, but I’m pretty deviant myself. Sex rituals and ruling the world sounds like a good life.
1. Space X
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2. Blue Origin
3. Virgin Galactic