SCU runner ROASTS CALXC

😂😂 I love Cal… but that is as funny af

"5 years, $200,000" "Never once went to practice!"

That dude's laugh is so good lmao

sign me up Cal wrote:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CRfS7UnpiVm/?utm_medium=copy_link

The internet wins again… wish I could take credit for this genius!

So…just like every big name school or program that puts too much money into the distances? Sounds to me like these bros are just jealous Cal didn’t want them and they’re still getting beat by us broken 4:13 guys…

Santa Clara can talk to Cal when they break into the top 50 schools in the country lmaoooo. Wolves don’t lose sleep over the opinion of sheep. Only stud outta SCU is Jack Davidson who fell off HARD and already is Garrett Macquiddy (Freshman at Cal)’s son lol

Cal acting high and mighty for a school that had two under 3:50 in the 1500m and zero under 14:15 in the 5k this year. Came last at Pac12s with the distance team only scoring 2 point

The SCU runner who made the video would have had the fastest 10k and 5k times on cal this year per TFFRS.

Watch yourself, SCU only had one under 3:50 themselves…

Echoing earlier dude, wolves don’t concern themselves with the opinion of sheep. Macquiddy sons literally everyone on SCU despite being a freshman. Keep yapping SCU, the smallest dogs bark the loudest. Have fun forking over 76k a year for a subpar degree

"WoLvEs DoNt LoSe SlEeP" dude you think Cal qualifies as wolves? You can be in the pac12 all you want but they waste so much talent, maybe they're more cub than wolf

although I personally think that a 3:43/1:49 freshman and a handful of young runners at low 3:50's is plenty talented and solid, I'm speaking more about name and academics. Who the hell outside of Silicon Valley knows who Santa Clara is lololol. I'm sure if most people had the choice, they would muchhh rather maybe not have the best running career but be at Cal and be set for life as opposed to an absolute no name school to everyone outside of Northern California, but you do you, it's your life.

lolscu wrote:

Watch yourself, SCU only had one under 3:50 themselves…

SCU is a way better developmental school. Cal just takes studs that never pan out. They're good because they SHOULD be good. It's not impressive.

Hilarious and well timed. This oldie wins the gold though . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyA9SOCEbSg

sadfdfsf wrote:

lolscu wrote:

Watch yourself, SCU only had one under 3:50 themselves…

SCU is a way better developmental school. Cal just takes studs that never pan out. They're good because they SHOULD be good. It's not impressive.

Pretty funny for an athlete to be talking crap about a program their school has only beaten once at the West Regional in the past 20 years. And considering Santa Clara's best finish during that time frame is 13th, I would certainly not call them a "development school."

Kenneth Copeland, verified millionaire wrote:

sadfdfsf wrote:

SCU is a way better developmental school. Cal just takes studs that never pan out. They're good because they SHOULD be good. It's not impressive.

Pretty funny for an athlete to be talking crap about a program their school has only beaten once at the West Regional in the past 20 years. And considering Santa Clara's best finish during that time frame is 13th, I would certainly not call them a "development school."

So you're saying Cal placed below 13th in the West region? How exactly does that qualify one as being a "wolf"?

You just played yourself fool. Proved our point - Cal is OVERRATED and doesn't do jack with the talent they receive.

sadfdfsf wrote:

Kenneth Copeland, verified millionaire wrote:

Pretty funny for an athlete to be talking crap about a program their school has only beaten once at the West Regional in the past 20 years. And considering Santa Clara's best finish during that time frame is 13th, I would certainly not call them a "development school."

So you're saying Cal placed below 13th in the West region? How exactly does that qualify one as being a "wolf"?

You just played yourself fool. Proved our point - Cal is OVERRATED and doesn't do jack with the talent they receive.

Not saying that Cal doesn't waste talent, just pointing out that SCU isn't really in a spot to be talking any sort of trash about anyone based on their own history and their record against Cal. And BTW, I ran at a program that has historically crushed both schools and continues to do so, so no, I did not "play" myself.

This thread took a much different route than I expected… just seems like a funny vid that wasn’t super serious… I don’t really have any vested interest in either program but I’m guessing this thread will be funny to pull up after regionals this year as I’m sure scu men will smoke cal… but that’s just a guess from a causal observer of the sport.

Seems like my bears are a bit too whiny and defensive. lol jeeeeze,

tiny school nobody cares about: 1

pac12 school nobody care about: 0

Kenneth Copeland, verified millionaire wrote:

sadfdfsf wrote:

So you're saying Cal placed below 13th in the West region? How exactly does that qualify one as being a "wolf"?

You just played yourself fool. Proved our point - Cal is OVERRATED and doesn't do jack with the talent they receive.

Not saying that Cal doesn't waste talent, just pointing out that SCU isn't really in a spot to be talking any sort of trash about anyone based on their own history and their record against Cal. And BTW, I ran at a program that has historically crushed both schools and continues to do so, so no, I did not "play" myself.

I'd say having a kid on the team faster than anyone on their team is enough to talk some trash. Played yourself again!

Sorry I'm having a hard time telling which school you're referring to (Played yourself)