Anyone know wha she was wearing?
Anyone know wha she was wearing?
rojo wrote:
Anyone know wha she was wearing?
https://twitter.com/Lizmccolgan/status/1410675403161747466
Asics?
Probably wearing the same ASICS proto she used earlier in the track season. Also a super shoe.
https://www.runnerspace.com/eprofile.php?event_id=14261&do=photos&photo_id=1055821
Liz is a real pain in the arse - her statements recently were the only reason Eilish hadn't gone sub4 was because she wasn't wearing Nike. So would she have won in Nike shoes in Oslo? Then she'd have run fast enough to make her definitely a drug cheat too! The hypocrisy is amazing.
At no point did she “credit” non super shoes. She simply pointed it out.
Same shoes the spanish dude ran 12'50" few weeks ago... not even sure the have metal pins in them
Now Rojo you guys are a bit lazy, but you got a glimpse of the shape of things to come. Didnt you notice that Kejelcha (who has switched to Adidas btw) and the other top five in the 3000 were all wearing the new Adidas Avanti with carbon rods, new foam and the like.... thats your Nike Dragonfly competitor. And i am pretty sure some of the guys in the mile were wearing the new Adidas Ambition (new foam but no plate) which is there to compete with the Nike Victory....
wv kid wrote:
At no point did she “credit” non super shoes. She simply pointed it out.
To be clear, she said no NIKE super shoes, not no super shoes. :-) So she made clear no Nike shoes were involved in this run. Which actually draws attention to, as it did in this thread, what she was actually wearing. A backdoor advertisement?
Shoes or no, clearly she ran well, dug deep, coming closer to the top end runners than she ever had before. Good on her!
This reminded me of "EPO CHEATS OUT"