Kind of a deep physio-philosophical question, but this has been bugging me. I see a lot of folks (pros and otherwise) talking about this or that work out (lets say for the 1500) to help them be "faster on the last XYZ", maybe 400 or 600 or whatever. (Or the cousin to that is... workouts supposedly meant to make you respond to changes in pace)
My question, does your body know the difference? Are not all workouts basically variations on a few (physiological) themes that you body only knows is working a few systems? Ya got intervals, thresholds, easy runs/distance runs, fast reps...
Can you really train your body to be faster on the last whatever, beyond just plain getting in better aerobic and anaerobic shape by any of your favorite methods? Your body only knows a few things and adapts.
Kind of like working on sprinting might not give you a better a kick, but getting in better shape so you can use a kick is possibly more effective.
I just wonder if we give the body more credit than it deserves. It gets better in a few areas and thats it. You cant train it to be better specifically in one lap of a race, no? You just get in better shape and thats what does it. The rest is neurological development, which I am ignoring conveniently.
I started thinking about this again with Hobbs/Ferlic vid doing a Michigan and the myriad of ways they do it.