taken wrote:
new era wrote:
I mean I can't judge because I'm not a high schooler who just ran 3:34, but I think there a huge upside to running at least a single NCAA season. There's the social aspect of being on a university team for one thing, but the NCAA teaches you how to race. Yea he ran 3:34 but he came 5th, and if he's running pro his only benchmark is whether or not he can win races. Plenty of exceptional talents enter the NCAA but can't win a race, and learn to do so over their career. When they get to the pro ranks they can compete for championships.
If you are doubting the importance of being able to race, look at Sam Tanner.. runs a 3:34 and on multiple occasions makes it clear that he's got a lot to learn when things are tactical
If he believes he will get faster, then that contract will be waiting for him after he runs a year of NCAA and shows that he's that much better (or not). Athing Mu, Sydney McLaughlin etc. at least gave it a year and showed that they are levels ahead, and I don't think Hobbs is quite at that level
The NCAA doesn’t teach you how to race. Running races teaches you how to race.
Exactly, we don't know how he races. A 1500 perfectly paced time trial is not the same as a championship race/round
Head to head with hocker, teare, nuguse etc (josh kerr, ches to throw it back) I wouldn't have him beating any of them. He came 5th in 1 race and y'all are losing your minds. 5th usually won't get you through a round. Not trying to doubt him, but at least let him give us a little more evidence (possibly at the trials?) and take some pressure off him before we put this kid on a pedestal and act as if he's all of a sudden better than everyone else.
Sorry to bring up Sam Tanner again, but he's basically run the same time as Hobbs and continues to have stiff competition in the NCAA. Besides, the NCAA record is probably going to be broken again this year with someone like Kipsang in the race