stan the corgi wrote:
Olde English 800
Seems we were typing the same thing at the same time.
stan the corgi wrote:
Olde English 800
Seems we were typing the same thing at the same time.
Do you mean citrus IPAs as in citrus flavors in the flavor profile, or the ones with citrus juice or rind added?
I generally have my socks knocked off by the flavors that talented brewers can pull out of carefully selected hop varieties, and those that are able to get grapefruit and stonefruit flavors out of hops alone tend to be some of my favorite IPAs.
The ones with a bunch of grapefruit peel added during the brewing process tend to be super one dimensional and lame, don't display brewing prowess, and just beat the consumer over the head with the added flavor.
Big flats.
Steel Reserve is truly disgusting, but then it's made for bums and drunks.
Good point. It was the beer alternative. Must be getting old.
Icehouse - the high alcohol content sibling of Milwaukee Best and the Beast Light. God help you if that was the keg in college. Headache and stomachache for days. Plus awful taste.
Honorable mention Bud Light.
Bud, Bud Light
barneyrubble wrote:
Coors? Schlitz? Hamms?
I would choose one bottle of Sam Adams over a warehouse full of Coors.
Not sure what the worst beer is but the best craft beer in Australia is Bentspoke Crankshaft
Freshies wrote:
Heady Topper - if you have it fresh, its amazing. One of the best beers I've ever had, and it was 10 days after canning. Then, I had one that was two months old and it was very average. IPAs really need to be consumed fresh.
A local brewery makes an amazing seasonal IPA. I saved one once to give a friend and forgot about it; three months later it was off-testing enough that I poured it down the drain.
.
It was canned a week before I had it! I wouldn't judge an IPA over six weeks old. Some cans of Other Half will last six months, but certainly many of the hop bombs start to turn a few months in.
Hey, maybe they just brewed a crappy batch. I'll give it another shot sometime and hope I'm wrong. But the fresh 4-pack I had was made for the drain.
barneyrubble wrote:
Coors? Schlitz? Hamms?
I would choose one bottle of Sam Adams over a warehouse full of Coors.
I just saw this post therefore…to answer your question? Piss Beer such as Coors Light, Bud light, etc😬
I'm confused by anyone who drinks a light beer. If it tastes nasty AND doesn't get you drunk, what is the point. Do you just like to be tortured? If so, would you be happier if I just punch you in the face? You would save money, and it would make me feel good.
If you say you drink light beer because you can drink more of them - drink more of something that tastes nastier to get the same amount of drunk and calories in the end- then you really do deserve getting punched in the face because you are so stupid.
Trollin wrote:
Albondiga wrote:
Any light beer (diet beer) is bad. Coors Light is undrinkable. It is absolutely true that real men do not drink light/diet beer.
Most US mass produced domestics suck: Coors is awful, Bud is bad. Miller is the only one that is okay.
A lot of Mexican beers are not as good as people pretend. Pacifico, Corona both suck.
Canadian beers aren't as good as people pretend either. Molson and Labatt's are pretty average.
I'd go with Coors and its diet offspring being the worst beer. Suckage.
Some of the baddest dudes i know drink light beer..and a bunch of it. And some of the softest guys i know drink craft and have zero ladies in their orbit
Your perceptions on this are flawed, perhaps influenced by the culture you live in. "Bad dudes" do not drink light beer. There's an oxymoron and contradiction built into your statement. Light/diet beer is for ponces. It was specifically designed for such types.
I'll bet you drink light beer. Admit it. You drink light beer, don't you?
Plauge on Wheels wrote:
Joe Jackson wrote:
Heinekin. Absolutely awful to me yet somehow appreciated by many. I’d drink any number of cheap, crap beers named here (Pabst, Old Milwaukee, even Coors Light) before I’d crack open a Heineken. Scratch that, I wouldn’t ever bother even opening one again because I know how bad it is.
I agree. Unless you're in Amsterdam. Seriously, try it there on draft if you're ever in the Netherlands. In that city it is a very different beer, very smooth, kind of sweet tasting. None of that weird green bottle skunk taste that is unique to Heineken when you drink it here in the USA. Probably because it doesn't have to be shipped across the ocean in a green bottle.
Noted. I have to believe that it tastes better fresh because I just can’t imagine that a beer as bad as Heinekin (as served in the US) could ever become popular.
On that note, I have become more and more of a local beer guy, but I blame that as much on the quality of the local brewers as the idea that the beer is fresher.
You may have to be from Philly to remember:
Schmidt's
Ortleib's
These beers actually hurt to drink.
I was too young to drink some of what were probably the worst, but which I collected empties on the side of the road when I was a kid, namely, Iron City, Genessee Cream Ale, Schlitz. Worst standard beers I recall from college were Milwaukee's Best, Budweiser, and Coors Light. Probably the worst tasting flavored beer I have ever had was some sort of bbq or meat-flavored porter brewed in the states.
Falstaff in returnable bottles circa 1984.
I love first one a lot.
Disko Eric wrote:
Big flats.
yep. It's about as good as you'd expect Walgreens store brand beer to be.
I would rather have no beer than drink Heineken, it smells and tastes of vomit.
barneyrubble wrote:Coors? Schlitz? Hamms?
I would choose one bottle of Sam Adams over a warehouse full of Coors.
The above mentioned beers plus all American mass produced beers as well as IPA's.