rewqgrb wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
But your understanding is it out of the question. That is the irony.
In English, please.
Too dumb to work your way past a typo? Figures.
rewqgrb wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
But your understanding is it out of the question. That is the irony.
In English, please.
Too dumb to work your way past a typo? Figures.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Yet the rest of the world already knows well that Houlihan has been found guilty of a doping violation and why - except for you in your basement.
That was never the question. You've switched goalposts. Again.
So you've never heard of Shelby Houlihan? Or CAS? Or the interesting decision that has provoked over a hundred threads on this site? Asleep at the wheel.
rekrunner wrote:
Waitforit4 wrote:
Ignore rekrunner. They've been on the boards for years supporting dopers.
I don't support dopers, and haven't ever.
I support science and logic and evidence and clean athletes and clean athletics.
It's a shame more athletes don't. Have a burrito on me.
Armstronglivs wrote:
So you've never heard of Shelby Houlihan? Or CAS? Or the interesting decision that has provoked over a hundred threads on this site? Asleep at the wheel.
These were never the questions. You are just adding more goalposts and scoring own-goals.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
So you've never heard of Shelby Houlihan? Or CAS? Or the interesting decision that has provoked over a hundred threads on this site? Asleep at the wheel.
These were never the questions. You are just adding more goalposts and scoring own-goals.
More gaslighting. They are never the questions for someone who doesn't want to answer them. A poster said earlier you probably believe Houlihan's story. That was the question you don't want to answer. But you did. Now you're just trying to slither away from what you said. Like the practised liar that you are.
Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
What are my options? Has it suddenly become OK now to succumb to conspiracy like a lemming?
Yup. He does.
There we go.
Then this.
rekrunner wrote:
I've only seen one side of the story.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Then this.
rekrunner wrote:
I've only seen one side of the story.
You are obsessed with rek. You would make a lovely pair.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
[quote]rekrunner wrote:
I've only seen one side of the story.
There is the CAS decision and Houlihan's excuses. So what side of the story is missing?
I haven't seen the CAS side.[/quote]
The only poster in Letsrun who professes to not knowing what has been the subject of a 100 threads.
Armstronglivs wrote:
rewqgrb wrote:
In English, please.
Too dumb to work your way past a typo? Figures.
Too dumb to proofread your agitating posts? Figures.
Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
There is the CAS decision and Houlihan's excuses. So what side of the story is missing?
I haven't seen the CAS side.[/quote]
The only poster in Letsrun who professes to not knowing what has been the subject of a 100 threads.
Unlike you, he knows what "knowing" means. Have you read the CAS report? You haven't.
As usual, your narcissistic mind thinks you know. In reality, you are the usual narcissistic psychopath.
rewqgrb wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Then this.
You are obsessed with rek. You would make a lovely pair.
He is the boss of doping apologists on this board. And there are so many.
Armstronglivs wrote:
rewqgrb wrote:
You are obsessed with rek. You would make a lovely pair.
He is the boss of doping apologists on this board. And there are so many.
You are wrong.
You, posting day in day out that amazing results are only possible through doping, you are the boss of doping apologists. At least Coevett says that (chosen) whites can do it without doping. You exclude every single amazing performance because you are stuck in the past.
rewqgrb wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Too dumb to work your way past a typo? Figures.
Too dumb to proofread your agitating posts? Figures.
I can rely on you to do it. But never to get the point.
Don't feed the troll.
rewqgrb wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I haven't seen the CAS side.[/quote]
The only poster in Letsrun who professes to not knowing what has been the subject of a 100 threads.
Unlike you, he knows what "knowing" means. Have you read the CAS report? You haven't.
As usual, your narcissistic mind thinks you know. In reality, you are the usual narcissistic psychopath.
You share something common. Neither of you know that Houlihan has been suspended for doping. Amazing. That makes you quite special here.
Armstronglivs wrote:
rewqgrb wrote:
Too dumb to proofread your agitating posts? Figures.
I can rely on you to do it. But never to get the point.
The point is that you are stuck in the past and anyone faster than Snell, Halberg etc. is a doper.
You know what? I am going to do something you have never done before. I am going for a long run now.
Enjoy your bitterness and keep the childish insults coming. You will not get more of the troll-feeding you crave.
rewqgrb wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
He is the boss of doping apologists on this board. And there are so many.
You are wrong.
You, posting day in day out that amazing results are only possible through doping, you are the boss of doping apologists. At least Coevett says that (chosen) whites can do it without doping. You exclude every single amazing performance because you are stuck in the past.
To believe the sport is clean is truly being stuck in the past.
rewqgrb wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I can rely on you to do it. But never to get the point.
The point is that you are stuck in the past and anyone faster than Snell, Halberg etc. is a doper.
You know what? I am going to do something you have never done before. I am going for a long run now.
Enjoy your bitterness and keep the childish insults coming. You will not get more of the troll-feeding you crave.
I bet it's quite a slow run.
Armstronglivs wrote:
More gaslighting. They are never the questions for someone who doesn't want to answer them. A poster said earlier you probably believe Houlihan's story. That was the question you don't want to answer. But you did. Now you're just trying to slither away from what you said. Like the practised liar that you are.
Is "gaslighting" your new buzzword? I guess you want to blame me for your confusion.
These weren't the questions regardless of what I want.
The only question was if I "probably buy Houlihan's story".
It also looks like the question you don't want to ask, because you keep bringing new questions.
You say I don't like to answer, but then fault me for giving many answers.
You forgot "Choosing who to believe, without first collecting facts, is the game of sheeple".
I'm not slithering away from my responses -- my stated and unstated positions have not changed.
I still haven't seen CAS's side of the story, nor the AIU's.
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it