While the inevitable rush to fill in the unknown blanks in the Hollobaugh story with the most lurid imaginable details may be off-putting, speculation about exactly what Rowbury meant with her unspecified comments is perfectly natural. Some people seem as averse to this curiosity as to its ribald results, but it would be weird to follow track closely, be witness to Salazar's rise and fall and the dissolution of the NOP, be treated to bombastic op-eds in the NY Times about the whole thing, and then see comments like those from Shannon Rowbury and just think "Huh, I wouldn't connect that to any of the chaos up there in Oregon" before moving on to the next section of the story.
It's precisely because Rowbury has always rubbed a lot of people the right way, and come back after having a daughter to continue running rather quietly at a very noisy level, that the "Why did she go there?" question has all the more gravity. But regardless, to the extreme cynics, I think it would be odd for even an oblivious interview subject (and Rowbury is the opposite of that) to offer comments like those about her own undisclosed behavior rather than someone else's.