This post was removed.
This post was removed.
This post was removed.
This post was removed.
This post was removed.
This post was removed.
When we talk about how certain groups of people are excluded or alienated via sport, it’s people like the brojos doing the excluding. Years of this site have shown that they are into very conventional sport and they do their best to quash critical thinking.
This is a good troll.
Raddissonnn wrote:
Appear to be so many trans people these days, isn't the best solution to just have your own sports competitions instead of muscling in on biological women's?
Can you name a single transgender female competing in NCAA womens distance running? Or in any sport? "Virtually none at all" is more accurate than "so many".
Obviously you've never loved and supported a female athlete who has given it her all for years only to have someone born with all the physical advantages of male snatch victory away. For every transgender champion there are dozens of female casualties.
Sham 69 wrote:
That's a good excuse for me to hop in girls' state and win.
I got the impression you were a mediocre runner. Was I mistaken and you really could win at the state level against girls? I might have gotten you confused with David45.
google- CeCé Telfer
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Raddissonnn wrote:
Appear to be so many trans people these days, isn't the best solution to just have your own sports competitions instead of muscling in on biological women's?
Can you name a single transgender female competing in NCAA womens distance running? Or in any sport? "Virtually none at all" is more accurate than "so many".
What's your point? Do you take the same attitude to doping? It's OK so long as it's only a few who do it and end up dominating? Oh, I remember your name - yes you do take the same attitude to doping.
Coevett wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Can you name a single transgender female competing in NCAA womens distance running? Or in any sport? "Virtually none at all" is more accurate than "so many".
What's your point? Do you take the same attitude to doping? It's OK so long as it's only a few who do it and end up dominating? Oh, I remember your name - yes you do take the same attitude to doping.
No, Raddissonnn made it sound like there are already so many trangender athletes, a new division is needed and that just isn't the case.
Who is cool with doping? Not me. I also dont like the new shoes that have made comparing different eras, apples to oranges.
Coevett wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Can you name a single transgender female competing in NCAA womens distance running? Or in any sport? "Virtually none at all" is more accurate than "so many".
What's your point? Do you take the same attitude to doping? It's OK so long as it's only a few who do it and end up dominating? Oh, I remember your name - yes you do take the same attitude to doping.
Exactly...
One of the worst parts of this post is how you attack people for disagreeing...just because people want to see fairness across sports you start throwing claims of discrimination, transphobe etc etc. Most people and posts on this site are not making transphobic comments...rather they are trying to ensure a fair and level playing field.
I am firmly in this camp. I have no issues with ensuring trans-people have equal rights across the board....but allowing 'born men' to compete against 'born-women' is completely unfair. To give a comparison, this would essentially be like saying...well why can't a heavyweight boxer compete against middleweights....it's would be discriminatory and fat-shaming to not allow it...who cares about the physical advantages...
That's not discrimination, it's common sense.
Anyway, I truly feel sorry for the female athletes who are being screwed over by this.
Transphobia is the view that biological males have an unfair advantage in women's sport. Transphobia is also the view that women's sport is a protected category. It is further the view that the interests of the 99% who are biologically female are subject to the interests of the 1% who are not.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Transphobia is the view that biological males have an unfair advantage in women's sport. Transphobia is also the view that women's sport is a protected category. It is further the view that the interests of the 99% who are biologically female are subject to the interests of the 1% who are not.
Correction: It is further the view that the interests of the 99% who are biologically female should not be subject to the interests of the 1% who aren't.[/quote]
There are two on my colkege team. The NCAA is unaware because they identify as women.
Transgender women and biological females are free to compete in the open division. Several women have played high school or college football.
Look at 99.9% of athletic world records and tell me biological males don’t have an advantage. A mediocre biological male could take a scholarship spot from my daughter.
I don’t care how anyone identifies, dresses, or marries, but there are different divisions for a reason. There is no scientific test to prove how someone identifies, so surely there will be males that compete as women to gain an edge if they can’t hang in the men’s division.