Unisex toy aisles, gay comic books, etc. notice how all efforts are being made to target minor children with a sexual agenda?
When is America going to say enough is enough?
hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/marvel-reveals-its-first-gay-teen-captain-america
Marvel reveals new gay teen Captain America...
Non-Running
Report Thread
You are reporting this thread to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum.
-
-
Holy crap batman.
-
Well I don't really see how that's targetting people with a sexual agenda any more than a straight teen Captain America is?
-
Yes, there is nothing more heterosexual than pouring over drawings of muscular men in skin-tight costumes running around town at night and wrassling with other men. Very sad that the liberal agenda has somehow turned comic books into a "gay" thing.
-
Captain America:
"Hey you.... you bad guy you better stop it or I will give you such a pinch" -
They should have come up with Captain Trans. Has the qualities of wonder woman and superman.
-
stan the corgi wrote:
They should have come up with Captain Trans. Has the qualities of wonder woman and superman.
Wouldn't that simply make you wonder? -
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
Yes, there is nothing more heterosexual than pouring over drawings of muscular men in skin-tight costumes running around town at night and wrassling with other men. Very sad that the liberal agenda has somehow turned comic books into a "gay" thing.
Hey Pig Man, I think there maybe room there for you now. -
This kind of thing doesn't help the gay situation, sorta like a parade. When needing to be tolerated it is best to keep a low profile, simply common sense,
-
Whatley wrote:
This kind of thing doesn't help the gay situation, sorta like a parade. When needing to be tolerated it is best to keep a low profile, simply common sense,
People don't need to be tolerate or feel like they have to be 'tolerated'. That's part of the problem.
I would've thought unisex toy aisles desexualise it if anything. None of this is sexual. If they are under 16 (the law here, sorry, I know it is different across different states there and it is difficult to keep up as there are 50 of them!).
The reason there were parades is because of the amount of change they effected. I don't go to any kind of parade or protest for anything I believe in but at the same time I recognise how much change resulted from them. There are still huge problems worldwide - until very very recently for example, if you were gay and your partner (maybe of a lifetime) was dying you were not allowed in to see them. There's a film called 'If these Walls could talk 2' which is a really good illustration of this. It is a good film as well.
People just want to live their lives.
Personally I hate the over the top stuff as I feel it's counterproductive. Maybe that's just what you're saying.
We don't want to be 'tolerated'. If it's your daughter, son, so on... why should they have to live like that? It's like how people with disabilities were tolerated up until recently. People just want to live normal lives. The vast majority. What you see on Twitter and so on is NOT representative, just like what you see on Twitter is not representative of Republicans either. Social media and the internet show the very worst tbh. If you met gay people in real life, at least the ones I know, you wouldn't know, and you would like them, as with anyone else, there is a cross-section of good, bad. It's like all of this 'woke' stuff now - it generates clicks and so they rev it all up to get people annoyed. -
This post drips with homophobia. Are you unfamiliar with comics? They constantly come out with new versions of the same characters, with different plot lines etc. A character like "Spiderman" doesn't just have one linear decades-long story line, they reinvent the charcter.
So, to better represent the diverse group of people who read comics, why not come out with a gay Captain America? There have been Black Superman characters, woman Spiderman and Captain America, etc.
Representation is not an agenda. -
It's just marketing. They know that not only do articles of this nature spread like wildfire, but they also often result in a strong emotional response from the reader which benefits them regardless of whether the response is positive or not.
Movies are fluff these days. Generic scripts, templated production, and trailers/marketing often mean more than the actual quality of the movie itself. For as long as people keep spreading and talking about articles like this, you will continue to see them though and it's because they work for their intended purposes
There is nothing wrong with having more gay characters in the media we watch, but it's clear that making publicity stunts out of them is just a means of using social issues to the studio's advantage (which is fair business really, it's just unfortunate that people eat this s*** up like candy). -
Wow. That's very gay!
-
No need to get your panties in a bunch, OP. Gay people exist.
-
50 years ago they would have burned the building down and beat the stuffings out of anyone pushing this depravity.
How far we have fallen. -
I would love to see a comic book of The Social Justice Warriors as this quasi Xmen like group that runs around stomping out injustices, both real and perceived.
Their arch enemy would be a group called The Stereotypes. They would be drawn as the most exaggerated stereotypes of every ethnicity, race, gender, and class.
Could be hilarious. -
Honestly? I don't see anyway else to save this country other than going from coast to coast with flamethrowers.
-
+1. None of you read comic books.
-
SNL had gay superheroes back in the 90s. They were way ahead of their time.
Right on. -
Lorne Michaels Man wrote:
SNL had gay superheroes back in the 90s. They were way ahead of their time.
Right on.
...and that skit would get the show canceled immediately, were it to run this coming Saturday.
