ienjoyracing wrote:
Ok it’s also not necessary to put a seatbelt on when you are driving 2 blocks within your neighborhood going less than 20 miles an hour. But I don’t have a moral problems lying to kids and telling them they need to put a seatbelt on in that situation. Like masks, seatbelts are but the smallest inconvenience, and the law that requires them is a measure taken by the government to protect ourselves and each other, not some Orwellian power grab that you claim. The law doesn’t define certain situations where you don’t have to wear seatbelts to account for the fact that often there is no risk of a violent high speed head-on collision. No, the law simply states wear it at all times, thus covering every possible scenario, and in doing so, ensures millions of lives are saved every year. So yeah, when a law is made requiring masks to be worn in public, of course there is gonna be situations when it’s downright useless to wear a mask, yet the law requires it. This is true of virtually every law, and it doesn’t require having a big noble moment of defiance where you refuse to do it in the name of liberty.
If you wanna know how ridiculous you sound to everybody else, imagine if you heard about some coach who got pulled over for driving without a seatbelt on the way to his neighbors, and instead of grumbling about stupid seatbelt laws, he refused the ticket, argued with the officer, resisted arrested and made a big scene and got arrested and fired from his job because he refused to concede that seatbelts are necessary when going under 20mph. Yeah he’s right, but he’s also laughably stupid because he can’t understand why the law is in place.
Respond if have any contentions to any of my points, I won’t respond however if your response involves a worldwide conspiracy.