Internetsherlock wrote:
In Forex trading a Risk Reward ratio of 1:3 is quite common but the problem is predicting
it accurately for even 3-5 times in a row. So Lets say you have a balance of 100,000 and you
decided to invest everything and compound it. It takes 12 times without a miss to become a Trilliaonaire. But it wont be so simple for sure due to various restrictions on brokers and what not... wondering if some traders out here can provide their views on this............
Balance $100,000
1 400,000
2 1,600,000
3 6,400,000
4 25,600,000
5 102,400,000
6 409,600,000
7 1,638,400,000
8 6,553,600,000
9 26,214,400,000
10 104,857,600,000
11 419,430,400,000
12 1,677,721,600,000
Haha this is absurd. Did you google this?
I trade for a living. I trade 15 markets.
Majority of traders do not risk more than 1-3% of their account per trade. Day traders, risk even less, usually 0.25-0.5% because they trade multiple times a day and fees of moving in and out and liquidity becomes and issue if size is too big.
So say you’re 100,000k account. You are risking 1%. That is your R. With a 1:3R (Risk to reward ratio) If you win the trade you are rewarded 3R ($3000). If you lose you -$1000. Play that out with a 50% win rate. That’s a fantastic statistical edge. Typically though, the higher the win rate, the lower the RR ratio and high RR lower win rate. Choose your poison.
No trader bets their entire account as suggested.
No it is not possible. Liquidity is a HUGE issue. That’s why even the best hedge funds only do 30-40% a year. Small retail traders can do 150%+. If you have a few million you can trade in and out repeatedly. Billions? No, you’ll move the market and entry and exit prices will be all over the place killing your profit margins.
Billionaire ? Yeah sure there are a few, George Soros, Paul Tudor Jones, Jim Simons. These guy run big hedge funds and are more position traders. Large macro outlooks. They have billions.
Retail traders Millions? Yes absolutely.