Bradley Smear Campaign wrote:
I dont like that I am posting on this website. I think the stigmas are true about letsrun being a place that tears down the sport and otherwise on a weekly basis seeks out a new piece of meat to rip apart in the limelight. This week's episode is: Matt Esche.
That said, I am here to set the record straight.
S.M. is a nice person but her claims are distorted and far from the reality. She has retroactively made herself into a victim in this incident. If this were the court of law and she were cross examined by the legal counsels she may not meet the minimum requirements to be considered a credible witness because there are subtle mental problems that would only be exposed through the lenses of a professional.
She is not "all bad" but maybe still developing mentally. Whereas Matt Esche is just another former sub-sub elite trying to live out his dream who is far from perfect too.
Unfortunately people in my generation turn to social media to garner support any time they face adversity and then people with otherwise mundane lives jump aboard to support them. Then these situations become reversed while the alleged victim sabotages the alleged perpetrator's reputation before a resolution has been sought out in the proper venue.
Of the 10000 signatures on the petition, I estimate less than 100 actually knew who Matt Esche is/was. The rest of the signatures are from the mundane branch of this story, be it parents, former friends of the athletes petitioning, non runner friends and students at the university.
This is another classic case of a young woman crowd sourcing petition signatures. People want to listen to these gossip sections because the same narrative has been overplayed in the media again and again.
Mean Male Coach vs Innocent Victim Female Athlete
But the real narrative in this story is:
Average Male College Coach vs Self Victimized Athlete going through post competition woes, having sudden regrets and acting impulsively like a juvenile. Or maybe S.M. has more extreme mental health issues and is suffering of BPD or bipolar disorder making her actions a defamatory and vindictive smear campaign.
Again, none of these things should dismiss who these people are and should mold a cast that they are only human and capable of mistakes.
But I just dont see why the coach has to be canned because a young female complains. It isnt like he woke up one day and singled her out. In good faith, the coach wasnt trying to hurt anyone's feelings. He was just trying to cultivate a competitive program.
aqswyhu wrote:
This is an interesting case because he has athletes at two different schools saying he did bad stuff, but because a lot of the information went on social media, UAB dealt with it before it got too much national attention. and there aren't articles about it (that I've seen) like there have been with some of these cases in the past it'll be harder to look up down the road. So Matt Esche could very well get hired by another institution in the future, just like others have, if UAB doesn't pass this information along. (Or if the AD just doesn't think that any of it is enough that matters.) He resigned under pressure. He didn't get fired.
This case also has to strike fear into a fair number of NCAA coaches who have been less than professional at times (not excusing any of it, just saying it happens...a lot) as it'.s further evidence of the growing voice student athletes have.
Interesting that Marc Burns comes up in both the letter from the Bradley athletes and in this piece
https://www.theprosiest.com/post/abusive-coaching-in-collegiate-athleticsHe was the head coach when Esche was the assistant. He only has athletes at one school criticizing his methods. Maybe he learned something and has done better at Mizzou?