Yes, it is I.
Yes, it is I.
It's not just Yalies who are daft. I live about seven blocks south of the main gates of Columbia University. Early in the Trump Administration, students at Barnard (part of Columbia) had unfurled, behind guarded gates and fences, a banner reading "We don't want your wall Mr. Trump."
If I was at Yale, I might think there was white privilege as well. If your not a politician's child, it is difficult to get into Yale.
ReallybroReally wrote:
Dairyland wrote:
No, it isn’t. The constitution defines it as an unalienable right, which means that you don’t need the constitution to have it.
Freedom of speech also exists in many other countries. Without any government we would still be able to say whatever we wanted, possibly even more than we can now, fool.
How's that inalienable right work for someone in N Korea?
Or China? Lmao. They really need to do a better job of teaching history.
Really? Yale student body is only 44% white.
Imagine caring about this “joke” and/or the blaze.
ReallybroReally wrote:
If they think the U.S. is so bad, perhaps they should move someplace they think is better.
bet you glad the radicals of the American Revolution didn't do that...
You know a country is a prosperous and coddled place to live when there are so many people actively creating "problems" out of whole cloth. It's like a game at this point.
"How many "issues" can I manufacture to assuage myself of my white guilt? And who cares if I end up destroying my country in the process."
Nevermind, I thought you were somebody.
Kipchoge landed on the moon with Buzz wrote:
You know a country is a prosperous and coddled place to live when there are so many people actively creating "problems" out of whole cloth. It's like a game at this point.
"How many "issues" can I manufacture to assuage myself of my white guilt? And who cares if I end up destroying my country in the process."
It is most definitely a game. And the prize is the feeling of unearned moral superiority.
Section two of the very first article of the US Constitution regarding apportioning representatives and taxes excludes "Indians" and regards slaves as only three-fifths in the count.
Yes, the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments corrected that, but still it's eerie to read that kind of language in the very first article of our country's constitution.
That said, of course, the US Constitution should not be repealed.
They are absolutely right about this.
The US constitution is 200+ years old. 2nd oldest in the world.
It needs a big overhaul.
Both the radical left and right have the desire to destroy their societies.
ja boi wrote:
ReallybroReally wrote:
How's that inalienable right work for someone in N Korea?
Or China? Lmao. They really need to do a better job of teaching history.
You bring up two dictatorships to prove me wrong yet you completely missed the point. If life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are unalienable rights, then we don’t need a constitution to protect them. Contradictory language.
balanceboard wrote:
Both the radical left and right have the desire to destroy their societies.
How?
And yet greedy Texan Power plant owners shut down supplies in a ice storm and kill people.
Ted Cruz flees to Cancun while AOC collects money for struggling Texans.
You want to know what petitions accomplish? Nothing. They are essentially a circle jerk for unhappy people to try and feel validated.
Just goes to show you can be both book smart and extremely stupid.
Ivy League is at the top of the podium when it comes to clown colleges.
joed|rt wrote:
If I was at Yale, I might think there was white privilege as well. If your not a politician's child, it is difficult to get into Yale.
It is also difficult if your grammar is deficient.
Left wing idiocy...Academia has been taken over by liberal/progressive lunacy bordering on mental illness.