I don’t think it’s unfair to say these boards have a conservative lean. I also don’t think it’s unfair to say that the majority consensus on supershoes (vaporflys, adios pro, etc.) and now the superspikes. Is that they need to be regulated more/toned down a bit.
So riddle me this...isn’t the idea of a free market that companies such as Nike can sell goods to the public without involvement from the government or likewise governing bodies such as World Athletics? Why are the views about banning shoes contradictory to the political views of these boards?
Free Market vs. Vaporflys
Running Shoes/Running Gear
Shoes
Report Thread
You are reporting this thread to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum.
-
-
World Athletics isn't the state government. They are a governing body of a sport. If you don't understand the difference then you aren't qualified to comment on politics, and hopefully you don't vote.
-
In a poll of who letsrun users would chose for president in 2020, 72% responded Biden. These boards do not have a conservative lean, rather they have some conservatives who are loud and post incessantly.
-
[quote]Kvothe wrote:
In a poll of who letsrun users would chose for president in 2020, 72% responded Biden. These boards do not have a conservative lean, rather they have some conservatives who are loud and post incessantly./quote]
yabba dabba do!
