500,000 Americans Have Died of COVID

Harambe wrote:

Great but what about the election fraud and 5G? Those must be involved.

why do you think under trump the u.s., uk, germany, france, italy and others cut ties with huawei? simply because of 'cybersecurity concerns'??

brainlet

uhh.. whut? wrote:

Harambe wrote:

Great but what about the election fraud and 5G? Those must be involved.

why do you think under trump the u.s., uk, germany, france, italy and others cut ties with huawei? simply because of 'cybersecurity concerns'??

brainlet

OK and refresh me on the vaccine microchips? I think I've got it all.

Harambe wrote:

OK and refresh me on the vaccine microchips? I think I've got it all.

there are no microchips in these that I am aware of, but chipped 'vaccines' are already well in the works

you think nanomedicine is conspiracy?

now I know why you follower types swallow the narrative

the real-world is just a little too scary..

figgo wrote:

there are no microchips in these that I am aware of, but chipped 'vaccines' are already well in the works

you think nanomedicine is conspiracy?

now I know why you follower types swallow the narrative

the real-world is just a little too scary..

Ok last one, sorry I'm so dumb.

The space lasers? Is that part of the great reset too?

Harambe wrote:

figgo wrote:

there are no microchips in these that I am aware of, but chipped 'vaccines' are already well in the works

you think nanomedicine is conspiracy?

now I know why you follower types swallow the narrative

the real-world is just a little too scary..

Ok last one, sorry I'm so dumb.

The space lasers? Is that part of the great reset too?

although you are being mostly facetious, you are also curious

you understand why space force was started do you not?

you understand musk's actual reasons for starlink? internet is merely a front - a very useful one but a front nonetheless

lover of tin wrote:

Too late for that. It has spread already. And yes, the deaths have been to fatties. Are you fat? I doubt it.

I live in a country where we care about everybody, not just skinny people and young people. 26 Covid deaths. But life is very expendable in the US - even when deaths have been preventable.

figgo wrote:

trashcan wrote:

It missed the mark in a big way.

this was the initial contention when big tech started removing the links and johns hopkins nuked it.

henceforth, however, this contention has been debunked by the experts

Then please show the experts debunking, please. This appears to be a new argumentation strategy, cite undefined experts and their undefined research.

It doesn’t look like you will accept any data produced using the scientific method via peer review that-contradicts your current beliefs that. If there is some way you would accept falsification of your theories let me know, but for know, I think I will stop trying to have a discussion with you in the manner of rational discussion of scientific matters.

kibitzer wrote:

trashcan wrote:

If a person had an aortic aneurysm rupture shortly before death-and had dementia and diabetes, do you want to attribute that death to dementia?

Only if it suits his purpose.

Yes.

if a guy had been suffering with dementia for years and going downhill -- or cancer, heart disease, etc, -- and dies it is not a legit Covid death. It is dying "with" Covid (oft presumed Covid).

If you don't buy the Covid narrative you are.....yep,

You guessed it.

An anti-semite.

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrJ6yjw8DhgUWoAmTlXNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9zAzMEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1614373232/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.jpost.com%2fdiaspora%2fantisemitism%2fanti-jewish-covid-theories-top-list-of-worst-antisemitism-outbreaks-653599/RK=2/RS=FStUScodz0nEUSVRo9xIElMriIk

-

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrJ6yjw8DhgUWoAlzlXNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9zAzIEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1614373232/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fjewishnews.timesofisrael.com%2fwatch-jewish-comedian-debunks-antisemitic-covid-conspiracies%2f/RK=2/RS=RW1NCH.1U1pLLX6LNDjMcOTs3kQ

-

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrJ6yjw8DhgUWoAizlXNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1614373232/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fapnews.com%2farticle%2fvirus-outbreak-race-and-ethnicity-new-york-discrimination-lawsuits-aaa94a5e496896c545a630c6ebf423c2/RK=2/RS=g_CokR_AYF89Upzgc_3ULTiwDtM

-

The Unkle wrote:

kibitzer wrote:

Only if it suits his purpose.

Yes.

if a guy had been suffering with dementia for years and going downhill -- or cancer, heart disease, etc, -- and dies it is not a legit Covid death. It is dying "with" Covid (oft presumed Covid).

Forget Covid for the moment. Stick with aortic aneurysm rupture. Early onset Alzheimer’s AA rupture. Why does it make sense to attribute it to Alzheimer’s?

Can someone PLEASE explain how "fake" tests correlate so well with excess deaths???

I cant figure it out! Help!!

figgo wrote:

although you are being mostly facetious, you are also curious

you understand why space force was started do you not?

you understand musk's actual reasons for starlink? internet is merely a front - a very useful one but a front nonetheless

Interesting! Do you think they started the fires on the west coast?

2600 bro wrote:

Can someone PLEASE explain how "fake" tests correlate so well with excess deaths???

I cant figure it out! Help!!

yes, as soon as it's explained how 'excess deaths' in 2020 were calculated relative to previous years

primary source, cdc methodology only please

Harambe wrote:

figgo wrote:

although you are being mostly facetious, you are also curious

you understand why space force was started do you not?

you understand musk's actual reasons for starlink? internet is merely a front - a very useful one but a front nonetheless

Interesting! Do you think they started the fires on the west coast?

you're referring to dews:

I don't think so, not the space force or starlink. they're defensive and wouldn't be used against our people.

other countries are certainly suspect, however..

Ok, look these over and get back to me! Here's 2020 data:https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm They explain the methodology at the bottom:Counts of deaths in the most recent weeks were compared with historical trends (from 2013 to present) to determine whether the number of deaths in recent weeks was significantly higher than expected, using Farrington surveillance algorithms (1). The ‘surveillance’ package in R (2) was used to implement the Farrington algorithms, which use overdispersed Poisson generalized linear models with spline terms to model trends in counts, accounting for seasonality. For each jurisdiction, a model is used to generate a set of expected counts, and an upper bound threshold based on a one-sided 95% prediction interval of these expected counts is used to determine whether a significant increase in deaths has occurred. Estimates of excess deaths are provided based on the observed number of deaths relative to two different thresholds. The lower end of the excess death estimate range is generated by comparing the observed counts to the upper bound threshold, and a higher end of the excess death estimate range is generated by comparing the observed count to the average expected number of deaths. Reported counts were weighted to account for potential underreporting in the most recent weeks. Here are their primary concerns:These estimates are based on provisional data, which are incomplete. The weighting method applied may not fully account for reporting lags if there are longer delays at present than in past years. For example, in Pennsylvania, reporting lags are currently much longer than they have been in past years, and death counts for 2020 are therefore underestimated. Conversely, the weighting method may over-adjust for underreporting, given improvements in data timeliness in certain jurisdictions. Unweighted estimates are provided, so that users can see the impact of weighting the provisional counts. However, these unweighted provisional counts are incomplete, and the extent to which they may underestimate the true count of deaths is unknown. Some jurisdictions exhibit recent increases in deaths when using weighted estimates, but not the unweighted. The estimates presented may be an early indication of excess mortality related to COVID-19, but should be interpreted with caution, until confirmed by other data sources such as state or local health departments. It is possible that recent improvements in the timeliness of data could also contribute to the pattern where a jurisdiction exhibits recent increases with the weighted data, but not the unweighted. Conversely, recent increases may be missed in jurisdictions with historically low levels of completeness (e.g., Connecticut, North Carolina) either due to the lack of provisional data or insufficient weighting to address incomplete data. Here's the paper describing the method for creating the 95% confidence upper bound:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sim.5595

figgo wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

Can someone PLEASE explain how "fake" tests correlate so well with excess deaths???

I cant figure it out! Help!!

yes, as soon as it's explained how 'excess deaths' in 2020 were calculated relative to previous years

primary source, cdc methodology only please

2600 bro wrote:

Ok, look these over and get back to me!

You will never get a response.

But also sites like Our World in Data and The Economist calculate excess deaths themselves using their own methodologies and see similar numbers.

The only answer the deniers have to this is to just ignore it.

figgo wrote:

you're referring to dews:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon

I don't think so, not the space force or starlink. they're defensive and wouldn't be used against our people.

other countries are certainly suspect, however..

Wow I can't believe the Clintons did this. I'm glad Q brought it to light. When is Trump getting installed as president?

Harambe wrote:

The only answer the deniers have to this is to just ignore it.

"Our minds are made up! Stop trying to confuse us with your 'facts' and 'logic'!"

In order to troll this thread you must first answer my question I’ve ask 15 times.

formerly present wrote:

Harambe wrote:

The only answer the deniers have to this is to just ignore it.

"Our minds are made up! Stop trying to confuse us with your 'facts' and 'logic'!"