Lincoln goes home devastated.
Lincoln goes home devastated.
Paradoxical wrote:
Ana de Aardvark wrote:
No one asked and no one cares
People do seem to care because they're moving out of that cesspool of a state in record numbers.
And?
Paradoxical wrote:
Ana de Aardvark wrote:
No one asked and no one cares
People do seem to care because they're moving out of that cesspool of a state in record numbers.
Oh so it’s ok to call California a cesspool just because it’s a blue state. What if I called Alabama or Wyoming a cesspool? Huh? HUH?
Harambe wrote:
Ana de Aardvark wrote:
No one asked and no one cares
Trumpers are obsessed with poop. It's pretty revealing
Yeah, who cares about poop on the sidewalks? Just wear good boots and wash them off with a hose when you get home. And it's convenient to just be able to drop a deuce wherever you want if you can't find a bathroom yourself. Why does that bother "Trumpers" so much?
Nice job libs wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Trumpers are obsessed with poop. It's pretty revealing
Yeah, who cares about poop on the sidewalks? Just wear good boots and wash them off with a hose when you get home. And it's convenient to just be able to drop a deuce wherever you want if you can't find a bathroom yourself. Why does that bother "Trumpers" so much?
If you don’t like California then pull yourself up by your bootstraps and MOVE. If you don’t live in California then mind your business! We don’t need rural elitists telling us how to live our lives!!!
Paradoxical wrote:
People do seem to care because they're moving out of that cesspool of a state in record numbers.
Heading to a republican state to steal some more electors ?
macdaddy og 1 wrote:
Paradoxical wrote:
People do seem to care because they're moving out of that cesspool of a state in record numbers.
Heading to a republican state to steal some more electors ?
Americans are Americans are Americans
Nice job libs wrote:
Nonsense! wrote:
You idiots believe everything you hear about San Francisco on Faux News. Yes San Francisco has a homeless problem, as does every major city. Drug problem? Absolutely. But the rampant feces and drug needles that you idiots describe is ridiculous. It's made up bullshyte that you morons just keep repeating. San Francisco is still one of the most beautiful cities in the world and one of the most popular tourist destinations. Grow a brain and stop being a sheep that just repeats things they hear.
It's also now the most moved-away-from city in America. Nice job libs.
Evidence?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/04/cities-americans-are-abandoning-for-new-jobs-careers/112604384/Nice job libs wrote:
Yeah, who cares about poop on the sidewalks? Just wear good boots and wash them off with a hose when you get home. And it's convenient to just be able to drop a deuce wherever you want if you can't find a bathroom yourself. Why does that bother "Trumpers" so much?
It's always the poop. Popping into a thread just to talk about poop. QED
spatial interaction wrote:
Nice job libs wrote:
It's also now the most moved-away-from city in America. Nice job libs.
Evidence?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/08/04/cities-americans-are-abandoning-for-new-jobs-careers/112604384/
So what if they are? These are hard working Americans!
This is awful. Why can't liberals just express their discontent with government by violently taking over the legislature like a good conservative?
Precious Roy wrote:
This is awful. Why can't liberals just express their discontent with government by violently taking over the legislature like a good conservative?
ROTFL
Precious Roy wrote:
This is awful. Why can't liberals just express their discontent with government by violently taking over the legislature like a good conservative?
Should we look up terrible things about cities from red stages and post them on LRC? That makes just as much sense, right?
Does anyone have a short paragraph or less answer to why Lincoln is on the block here? I've looked around myself and I know there are things like suspending HC in the civil war but can't find much that explicitly spells out the contention of his legacy.
If Baltimore ever becomes wealthier, there is a chance your city can become as woke. Don't be jelly of Frisco.
oldschoollrc wrote:
If Baltimore ever becomes wealthier, there is a chance your city can become as woke. Don't be jelly of Frisco.
I guess I don’t understand why Rojo, who seems to hate any and all coastal cities, doesn’t pick himself up by his bootstraps and move to rural America. This way he won’t be so upset all the time.
It’s not ridiculous, it’s absolute true. Fevers and p*ss on every street corner. Just came back from there. You can’t fix it till you admit it.
#LHRC wrote:
It’s not ridiculous, it’s absolute true. Fevers and p*ss on every street corner. Just came back from there. You can’t fix it till you admit it.
Anecdotes are not facts. Please don’t condescend and speak down about American citizens!
Something that is being overlooked is the costs and who pays them. I can't read the article so I don't know if it was discussed or not but nobody on this thread has mentioned it yet. I was living in Chapel Hill, one of the most liberal towns on the East coast, when the council decided to change the name of a main road called Airport Road to Martin Luther King Road. There was already a MLK Street in town but they wanted to rename another one. Now, this is about as Blue of a town as you can find in America (seriously, even the fire engines are painted Carolina Blue) so this sounds like it would not have been any opposition. Instead, there was a large battle. Why? Airport Road was loaded with many businesses. There was a parade of business owners at the council meeting, each detailing how much it would cost them to change their signs, change their advertising materials (many of which had just been printed), and many other expenses that would need to be paid. These expenses would all fall on the businesses themselves. There were other concerns, such as people having trouble finding their business if looking at an old map, etc., but the financial cost was their biggest concern. In San Francisco, there are going to need to be many, many changes done to these schools. The sign out front, signs on the scoreboards at athletic fields, school stationary, repaint the band bus with the name of the old name of the school on it, possibly a need to purchase new uniforms for athletic teams, repaint over any mention of the old school name in hallways, etc., There will be a large financial cost for each school. These are PUBLIC schools. So who is this cost going to fall on? John Q. Taxpayer. And he may not want to pay it once he sees the bill. An earlier poster stated:
Nonsense! wrote:
Why are you so worried about what they do? Do you live there? The people that live there voted for the people that made the decision. They are happy with it.
The residents of Chapel Hill also voted for the extreme far Left council members that represented them. They supported them ... most of the time. However, there was serious opposition with this proposal (and of course accusations that anyone who opposed the change must be "racist"; it was funny seeing people on the far Left call other people on the far Left "racists"). Just because the people of San Francisco voted these people onto the council does not mean they are going to agree with everything they propose.
CarolinaRunner wrote:
Something that is being overlooked is the costs and who pays them. I can't read the article so I don't know if it was discussed or not but nobody on this thread has mentioned it yet.
I was living in Chapel Hill, one of the most liberal towns on the East coast, when the council decided to change the name of a main road called Airport Road to Martin Luther King Road. There was already a MLK Street in town but they wanted to rename another one. Now, this is about as Blue of a town as you can find in America (seriously, even the fire engines are painted Carolina Blue) so this sounds like it would not have been any opposition. Instead, there was a large battle. Why?
Airport Road was loaded with many businesses. There was a parade of business owners at the council meeting, each detailing how much it would cost them to change their signs, change their advertising materials (many of which had just been printed), and many other expenses that would need to be paid. These expenses would all fall on the businesses themselves. There were other concerns, such as people having trouble finding their business if looking at an old map, etc., but the financial cost was their biggest concern.
In San Francisco, there are going to need to be many, many changes done to these schools. The sign out front, signs on the scoreboards at athletic fields, school stationary, repaint the band bus with the name of the old name of the school on it, possibly a need to purchase new uniforms for athletic teams, repaint over any mention of the old school name in hallways, etc., There will be a large financial cost for each school. These are PUBLIC schools. So who is this cost going to fall on? John Q. Taxpayer. And he may not want to pay it once he sees the bill.
An earlier poster stated:
Nonsense! wrote:
Why are you so worried about what they do? Do you live there? The people that live there voted for the people that made the decision. They are happy with it.
The residents of Chapel Hill also voted for the extreme far Left council members that represented them. They supported them ... most of the time. However, there was serious opposition with this proposal (and of course accusations that anyone who opposed the change must be "racist"; it was funny seeing people on the far Left call other people on the far Left "racists"). Just because the people of San Francisco voted these people onto the council does not mean they are going to agree with everything they propose.
Yes and you’re saying this as a former resident on Chapel Hill, not by someone who maybe has never been to San Francisco and is just trying to score “LOOK AT ME” political points