Joe Biden says he's a proud grandfather. Why didn't he invite his youngest granddaughter to the inauguration (mom is stripper?)?

Maybe they were invited but already had other plans?

I'm glad Joe is proud of his coked out son and pot head daughter.

Perhaps she wanted her time to be payed for and they refused so she did not attend.

Rojo, Actually, this is a laughable, but typical for you, comment. It says everything about you and pretty much nothing about anything else. For one, saying that you didn't much like either candidate was not exactly a lightning rod comment that would have engendered a $hitstorm of feedback, especially when so many squishy independents were trying to make up their minds. For two, the fact that you had a fear, even if genuinely held, would only be indicative of the broader culture if you were a reasonable and clear thinker, but you irrationally see liberal bogeymen everywhere so it's your fear that is telling here. I'll put it in 5th grade terms so that you might understand: if I say I have a fear that all dumb trust fund kids whose parents bought them places at Princeton are serial killers, does that say anything concrete about the dumb trust fund kids or the broader culture?

Also, I don't particularly know the story about this grandchild, but how does that make Biden a "disgrace"? The earlier comment that the hypocritical GOP is all of a sudden finding "family values" is spot on. By the way, I bet you loved W and his VP Sarah Palin, who has/had a trailer-trash family with illegitimate kids run amok.

On what planet was Sarah Palin George W. Bush's Vice President? It wasn't Earth.

I believe that the underlying intent of the OP is to point out the fact that being a child or grandchild of a POTUS is a privilege that will open a lifetime of doors and yield innumerable benefits, many monetary. By POTUS failing to recognize and embrace all of his progeny, he is denying this innocent little girl the same benefits that his lifetime of graft and corruption has yielded for his other children and grandchildren.

She didn't let Joe make out with her

rojo wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Did you miss Stormy Daniels at Trump's inauguration?

Well said.

What times we live in. This is why I said on the podcast last year that it was a disgrace that both Biden and Trump were the best their parties could do. Of course, it's a disgrace to 2020 that I put that behind the paywall because I was afraid that comment would get me cancelled. I literally feared that saying neither dude should be president would get me cancelled. Crazy.

I wholeheartedly agree with you in that both parties put forward flawed candidates, but truthfully, being able to express your discontent for either candidate was and still is possible without fear cancel culture. There are tons of negative press about Biden and Trump on all of the mainstream social media outlets. There are countless conservative Facebook pages that are extremely critical of liberals, demarcates, Biden, etc., and vice versa. The problem is, people and media outlets get triggered when you knowingly spread dangerous information. The easiest example of this is the numerous false and misleading claims about election fraud. As a long time election volunteer, myself and everyone whose part of that process knows that 2020 was most likely the fairest and most accurate election the U.S. has ever held. Most counties and states nearly doubled their election budget and spent an enormous amount of extra effort to not end up in Trump's crosshairs becasue it was known he was preparing to claim fraud before the election started. This is not about being Biden or Trump supporter, the 2020 PRESIDENTAIL ELECTION WAS FAIR or as fair as it can be for something of that size (period).

The serious problems come in when after every states have certified their election, whether you like the results or not, to continue claiming fraud and not accept the results becomes a constitutional issue. You are basically saying you don't accept our democratic principles of representative government, free and fair elections and transfer of power. When you have websites, groups and individuals including the former president who have the ability to influence 10s of millions people to counterman our democracy by spreading dangerous ideologies, theories and inciting people to commit violence...as a media outlet for the sake of the nation you have to act. Btw, social media outlets also ran the risk of criminality when they knowingly allow their platform to be used to spread hate, misinformation and organize acts of violence. The former president and sites like Parler, tested the limits of free speech. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater!

With all of that said, you and the LRC is free to criticize liberals, demarcates and Biden, etc.; opposition and accountability is healthy for our democracy. At the end of the day, no loving person should want to inflict hurt and pain on any group of people and/or see their fellow Americans duped -or misinformed. We are all Americans, we all want what's best for our country, albeit we might disagree on how to get there.

Precious Roy wrote:

Trump leaves office and right wingers rediscover their fake morality in three, two, one . . .

I don't know about right wingers as I am not one, but you have zero morality. You should be quiet.

The unfathomable to anyone living outside the US is the way so many Americans think there is any equivalence between Biden and Trump and his Republican enablers. It's like going back to 1933 Weimar and believing the extreme right wing leader was a champion of democracy and family values. The camps just turned up by accident. Those who fail to understand history are condemned to repeat it.