That dude retired almost 10 years ago. He's not likely to be up on the latest research. And apparently, he was a shill for Peabody Coal.
This is also kind of interesting about Lindzen:
Whatever the bet really was, Lindzen is clearly on track to lose.
Please, show me your list of 1000's of climate scientists who dispute anthropogenic climate change. I know another one who is also retired, but that's all my echo chamber has allowed me to hear.
Where is your list?
Ah yea, the credibility of any scientist who doesn't toe the line MUST be attacked. He doesn't share the same views and as you and Joy Behar on the subject he has a PHD in, so he simply MUST be a "shill".
Stop being stupid.
It's fine to have a contrarian like Lindzen. Science needs contrarians. But if you are going to run counter to accepted science, you have to bring the goods.
Lindzen turned out to be wrong.
Where is your list of 1000's of climate scientists who dispute anthropogenic climate change?
As I said before, today there are practically zero climate scientists who do not accept anthropogenic climate change. But if I'm wrong, you need to let me and everyone else on this thread know about it.
Here's a hint for you. There was NEVER a time when there was an overwhelming consensus of climate scientists that another ice age was imminent (there is general recognition that ice ages come and go and there may be another in the next few thousand years).
Time put what they did on the cover in the 70s because such spectacular stories sell magazines (I bet you didn't know that media companies were in the business of . . . selling magazines - at least back then). In other words, Time put that on the cover in the 70s because they knew that there are a whole lot of morons like you who eat that sh!t up and can't tell the difference between pop culture and actual science.
Were there a few scientists who were talking about the coming ice age at the time? Sure. Was there an overwhelming consensus among the community of climate scientists that such an ice age was imminent? No. But Time had no trouble finding a few to say a few things that would get morons to buy their magazine. This is how pop culture works. Lots of morons eat up lots of sh!t. Congratulations on keeping our economy going with your sheer stupidity.
You are beautiful!
You have to be pretty dumb to admit you're wrong and then declare victory anyway... yet here you are... lol...
The "beautiful" thing is that you have no idea you're stupid.
Real Obvi is right here. There was never a time when scientific consensus held that we were on the brink of global cooling.
What's even more interesting about all this is that there is a common misconception that Time magazine ran a cover story on global cooling. In fact, this never made the cover. There has been a Time cover image circulating for many years among climate deniers. But like the cover posted at Trump golf courses, it was a fake.
This is a guest post by David Kirtley. David originally posted this as a Google Doc, and I'm reproducing his work here with his permission. Just the other day I was speaking to a climate change skeptic who made mention of an...
NBC News has conducted a detailed analysis of the Hunter Biden laptop, which was once derided by mainstream news outlets as a “classic example of Russian mis...
This comment is stupid even for you which is saying something...
Time didn't put the story on the cover in the 70s because they beat Teen Beat to the scoop moron. It was on the cover because the "smart scientists" were literally worried about it.
Ah yea, the credibility of any scientist who doesn't toe the line MUST be attacked. He doesn't share the same views and as you and Joy Behar on the subject he has a PHD in, so he simply MUST be a "shill".
Stop being stupid.
It's fine to have a contrarian like Lindzen. Science needs contrarians. But if you are going to run counter to accepted science, you have to bring the goods.
Lindzen turned out to be wrong.
Where is your list of 1000's of climate scientists who dispute anthropogenic climate change?
As I said before, today there are practically zero climate scientists who do not accept anthropogenic climate change. But if I'm wrong, you need to let me and everyone else on this thread know about it.
LOL!
Lindzen "turned out to be wrong" in a bet you don't know the actual details of that he denies being involved in in the context you're trying to put it in.... oh and he's a "shill"...
You can't name ONE climate scientist without Google.
You can't explain why ANY agree or disagree with each other.
This comment is stupid even for you which is saying something...
Time didn't put the story on the cover in the 70s because they beat Teen Beat to the scoop moron. It was on the cover because the "smart scientists" were literally worried about it.
Will you at least admit that you were wrong here?
Are we pretending that reputable scientists weren't worried about global cooling in the 70s?
You lefties have a terrible habit of pretending the past either didn't happen at all or lying about it to make yourselves feel better about your past behavior.
The global cooling concern was real. Ironically it was also closer to accurate than than the global warming predictions of the 80s which said he'd all be dead by now...
For the past two weeks in Glasgow, Scotland, world leaders have gathered at COP 26, the United Nations Climate Change Conference, to listen to the same message: Disaster is just around the corner.
Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates in a new interview said “there aren’t enough” Republicans denouncing white supremacy, after members of the party came under fire amid accusations that their rhetoric has contributed to th...
There are literally more people being carjacked by a Democrat as you read this than have been killed by "white supremacists" in the last 50 years.
Finding other really stupid people to say the stupid things you like to hear doesn't bolster your argument. It just proves that there's other people as stupid as you out there.
Biden's Presidency Filled With Failure, Weakness, and Chaos TOPLINE: As the world watches President Biden deliver his State of the Union Address tonight, it's important to remember that Biden has no plan to fix his self-made...
This comment is stupid even for you which is saying something...
Time didn't put the story on the cover in the 70s because they beat Teen Beat to the scoop moron. It was on the cover because the "smart scientists" were literally worried about it.
You don't understand. I just want you to admit that you were wrong about the Time cover story.
Can't you at least admit that there was never a Time cover story about global cooling?
This comment is stupid even for you which is saying something...
Time didn't put the story on the cover in the 70s because they beat Teen Beat to the scoop moron. It was on the cover because the "smart scientists" were literally worried about it.
You don't understand. I just want you to admit that you were wrong about the Time cover story.
Can't you at least admit that there was never a Time cover story about global cooling?
