Is there a bias towards D2 runners from Letsrun? Multiple threads deleted and never any coverage from lots of great runners.
Is there a bias towards D2 runners from Letsrun? Multiple threads deleted and never any coverage from lots of great runners.
Id rather give advice to a middle age man going through a divorce then talk about something other than NAU or Tinman's terrible training.
I didn't know that any got deleted. We usually point out how bad the schools are academically and then some people get defensive and probably post something that causes it to be taken down. Bottom line is that there are about five really fast D2 XC teams and there are some random fast guys in various schools every year in sprints but 99% of the D2 schools are really bad academically.
High School Go Go wrote:
but 99% of the D2 schools are really bad academically.
I mean, this is also true if you replace D2 with D1. People seem to forget how many awful schools are out there.
DailyJogger wrote:
Id rather give advice to a middle age man going through a divorce then talk about something other than NAU or Tinman's terrible training.
Enjoyed the metaphor.
What's so interesting about D2? Why aren't you pushing for threads about NAIA runners, too?
Forget? I see you must have attended a D2 school because you are unaware of facts.
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities