Biden announces 1st day order of business. Allow biological males in women's sports

ocin3125 wrote:

I understand this is a mainly liberal website right? Well here you go liberals!

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/01/15/joe-biden-day-1-order-on-transgender-rights-in-sports-and-bathrooms/

Hell to the yeah boi. We on.

Guys in girl’s bathrooms: don’t care.

Guys in girl’s sports: this is actual insanity.

*Puts on lipstick menacingly*

Ah finally, the 800m WR is mine!

Sometimes the best way to expose stupidity is to let them do what they want. Sucks for the biological women who will be cheated out of their place in the meantime, but if it's open season for biological men to compete as women, after awhile women will say "wait, this is only hurting women".

The founding fathers, when contemplating the role of government, surely foresaw the need to interfere in how sports participation is governed.

you go girl? wrote:

Sometimes the best way to expose stupidity is to let them do what they want. Sucks for the biological women who will be cheated out of their place in the meantime, but if it's open season for biological men to compete as women, after awhile women will say "wait, this is only hurting women".

Yeah, women should be protesting this crap loud and clear, but most support men being homosexuals, so there ya go. It's truly a backasswards world we live in now.

Disclaimer, I'm all for people being what they want. BUT I'm not for women getting screwed over in sport. If you want a good picture of the reality of this issue go, go watch the South Park clip/episode where a trans dominates the women's sports while exhibiting "masculine" characteristics. It is absolutely hilarious. Joe Biden must comment on that in order to legitimize his standing. He is a people pleaser and nothing else.

Biden, who has never been employed in the private sector, has something like 50 years in public office. Why is he only now doing something about this? BTW, Pelosi should be sanctioned for violating her own House rules by calling herself a wife and mother. She needs to get with her own program and start referring to herself as spouse and parent, and let the rest of us call her a Mother.

It would be interesting for a large group of girls to organize, say at least 20, and all show up for HS football tryouts. If the do it enmasse, there is no way a coach could politically correctly cut all 20 or more, or at least a large percentage of those trying out. That would then force the coach to cut some boys to open roster spots for the girls. There is a reason that KAOS was formed in Biden's beloved Delaware for tax purposes.

Biden won't have the power to do any such thing. Each state determines who is eligible to compete for HS and the NCAA and USTAF for college and pro.

ordering more wings wrote:

Disclaimer, I'm all for people being what they want. BUT I'm not for women getting screwed over in sport.

Look around you. Do you think the people on this thread wanting to censor trans identities on this thread are doing so because they care about women's sport? A big threat to equality is absolute definitions because it reinforces stereotypes. Their real motivation is to be able to say women or blacks or LGBT people are 100% totally completely different from them so then they can justify inequality.

If we get rid of definitions, BLM does not exist.

go r wrote:

If we get rid of definitions, BLM does not exist.

'Black' isn't rigidly defined. Neither should 'woman'

889 wrote:

you go girl? wrote:

Sometimes the best way to expose stupidity is to let them do what they want. Sucks for the biological women who will be cheated out of their place in the meantime, but if it's open season for biological men to compete as women, after awhile women will say "wait, this is only hurting women".

Yeah, women should be protesting this crap loud and clear, but most support men being homosexuals, so there ya go. It's truly a backasswards world we live in now.

How can women protest loud and clear when they've haven't competed against a transgender athlete and probably never will? Why would they take a controversial position against a problem that doesn't exist?

If, later on, a prospective employer were to Google their name and find some rants against transgender athletes, it might prevent them from getting a job they might have otherwised received. Female athletes would be idiots to take your advice.

kibitzer wrote:

"It's on Breitbart! It must be true!"

Owning the conservatives on day 1.

Seriously if biden spend days 1-7 just undoing about 70% of trumps executive orders, it would be a solid start to getting back to a functional govenrment.

Tatar wrote:

Look around you. Do you think the people on this thread wanting to censor trans identities on this thread are doing so because they care about women's sport? .

Umm...quite obviously, yes. That is the reason.

Tatar wrote:

go r wrote:

If we get rid of definitions, BLM does not exist.

'Black' isn't rigidly defined. Neither should 'woman'

There's an argument to be made that races are somewhat arbitrary. Not so for biological sex. The two distinctly different sexes are foundational to mammalian life.

shifty principles wrote:

Guys in girl’s bathrooms: don’t care.

Guys in girl’s sports: this is actual insanity.

This something hopefully the supreme court can now take care of, hopefully somebody is on top this and will get a challenge there quickly.

I dont want to see my daughter losing a major title to a male. If I am being honest its really the reason I voted Trump, hate to be a single issue voter but high level sports have been great to my daughters its a shame so many want to end high level womens sports.

supreme advantage wrote:

shifty principles wrote:

Guys in girl’s bathrooms: don’t care.

Guys in girl’s sports: this is actual insanity.

This something hopefully the supreme court can now take care of, hopefully somebody is on top this and will get a challenge there quickly.

I dont want to see my daughter losing a major title to a male. If I am being honest its really the reason I voted Trump, hate to be a single issue voter but high level sports have been great to my daughters its a shame so many want to end high level womens sports.

So how long will it take for the Connecticut girl's case to work it's way up to the Supreme Court? Sorry, but a HS girl being bumped from 6th to 8th, isn't going to fire up too many judges.

The POTUS has nothing to do with the issue and the chances of your daughter even competing against transgender athlete is statistically zero.