rule readerr wrote:
So deal with the reality of employment and sanctions especially in the context of one evasive answer.
No. She did not get banned because of "one evasive answer".
Reality:
In 2017, she got banned for three whereabouts failures in 2016 (three misses out of eleven attempts). Regularly employed people might face similar if not worse consequences, depending on the context, for example if they miss unannounced three workdays within a period of eleven workdays, even if one of them includes a visit to the White House.
Now she got banned for "tampering within the results management process" . The details are still not public knowledge, but surely won't just be "one evasive answer". Once the details are out, feel free to compare them to UK employment laws.
Dry and Kipsang specifically, recent examples banned for 2.5, got banned for providing false evidence in writing about their whereabouts failure. For comparison, if say a construction worker wouldn't show up for work, and then when caught, would provide false evidence in writing, he might get fired on the spot.