Bipbob wrote:
Back in the day it used to be more about who and how an athlete ran the fastest time, but now the focus is on the marketing of what shoe they were wearing that allowed them to break the World Record, rather than the physical performance itself. Pretty sure this trend is obvious to anyone here.
Sure, advancement in technology is bound to happen in any sport. Problem with the current situation is lack of emphasis on the root of the sport, that marathon is about competition of who has the best toughness and endurance. It shouldn’t be about competition of which shoe technology allows them to run the fastest.
Do you expect general public will be interested in sport where biggest discussion and coverage continues to be about what gear they were wearing?
I agree that the coverage needs to shift away from the shoes. Luckily, almost every reasonable shoe brand has a good shoe now so the playing field is leveling and we can stop talking about it and giving free advertising to the shoe companies.
So what if times are shifted by two minutes? A 2:01 is still faster than a 2:04, and now that someone has run a 2:01 in good shoes, it will be fun to see if someone else can run faster. I enjoyed watching today's race and it was clear that Martin Hehir had a lot of toughness and endurance, and was able to run faster than other runners in the field that had equally good shoes. I don't see why it would be more interesting if they were running in crappy shoes that people in the 1990's wore.