Covid19 Cases Actually AREN'T Rising - Here's Why

Okay, so most or all of positives are fake. What are these people dying of in increasing numbers?

oldschoollrc wrote:

Okay, so most or all of positives are fake. What are these people dying of in increasing numbers?

What people? Serious question.

Very important one too. Identify who those people were that died from respiratory disease in the time frame in which we are discussing (March/April) and what actually happened that they died in bunches.

Facts are facts- SARSCoV2 has NEVER been isolated and purified. There are currently 40 some FOI requests to various government agencies all around the world to produce the results that show isolation and purification of SARSCov2 and all of the response stated they do not have such results- all of them.

suree wrote:

A bunch of nonsenses

0/10

Bro do you know how a virus works? After 8 months of weird-posting I had assumed... wrongly.

Allen53 wrote:

oldschoollrc wrote:

Okay, so most or all of positives are fake. What are these people dying of in increasing numbers?

What people? Serious question.

Very important one too. Identify who those people were that died from respiratory disease in the time frame in which we are discussing (March/April) and what actually happened that they died in bunches.

Facts are facts- SARSCoV2 has NEVER been isolated and purified. There are currently 40 some FOI requests to various government agencies all around the world to produce the results that show isolation and purification of SARSCov2 and all of the response stated they do not have such results- all of them.

Hosptials in Iowa are filling up...now, is that all due to Covid or is it a covid/flu combination? I don't know, but I tend to think cases are on the rise. I'm someone who is skeptical about the overall seriousness of Covid, but now that the hospitals are actually being a bit overun where I'm at, for the first time since it all started, I'm a bit less skeptical about it being "real"...I'm still very skeptical about its origins, though.

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.

[quote]gddfdsafdaf wrote:

Hosptials in Iowa are filling up...

Which hospitals?

What is the data?

I have family members in the medical field at multiple hospitals in different parts of the state who have said as much, and I know a couple people who have been hospitalized. I don't have numbers, though.

So what I see is that you are really a spoiled and entitled selfish prick who couldn't care less about people and their lives outside of yourself and what benefits you. So listen prick...most of us who observe the precautions and wear the mask and social distance, etc. do so because we have people we care about and we don't want them to catch COVID because of us. As a result, yes, we do less and go out less. You can be sure it's not a Low-T or non-macho thing as much as we can be sure you would just laugh it off if someone actually took you to task for your opinion. In my world, you don't have the freedom to have opinions that can be damaging to society, and I welcome you to try to change that. Until then, pipe down and stop spreading this garbage that can be damaging to society. Now. I don't know who you are or where you're from but it stops. Now.

suree wrote:

I can see this a futile effort. We can all find models, metrics, extrapolations, and so on to support our narratives. Heck, we can use the same exact information and still draw totally different conclusions. Confirmation bias is everything.

Frankly, do whatever you want. Wear your masks, social distance, restrict your freedoms, follow your orders and continue to perpetuate irrational fear over a virus that 99.8% of people survive. The rest of us without low-T will live our lives normally.

UnbiasedOhioVoter wrote:

The Unkle wrote:

Never in history has a candidate had an 800,000 vote lead -- as Trump did in PA-- and lost that state. Until 2020 and PA.

Let's pretend there is nothing suspicious there.

It's almost as if mail-in ballots were used more this year.

And it's totally NOT easy to commit fraud with mail in ballots. Even if you let them arrive late without a postmark and refuse to let anyone see the signatures on the envelopes. Not easy at all.

Also not at all unusual to count more ballots than you mailed out, or more than there are voters in a precinct. Happens all the time.

Bad Wigins wrote:

And it's totally NOT easy to commit fraud with mail in ballots. Even if you let them arrive late without a postmark and refuse to let anyone see the signatures on the envelopes. Not easy at all.

Also not at all unusual to count more ballots than you mailed out, or more than there are voters in a precinct. Happens all the time.

Trump blowing an 800,000 vote lead in PA is almost as embarrassing as 2600 cases you predicted :)

Enjoy your loss

Current numbers:

Stoppit is hovering at about a 92, but Harambe is going strong for 89.

Their responses will dictate increases and decreases.

Stay tuned.

My responses dictate whatever I want. My response. My numbers. 92 this. PS Urban was complicit. You can eat your buckeye. As for Covid? Consideration is the only choice.

TheOhioState wrote:

Current numbers:

Stoppit is hovering at about a 92, but Harambe is going strong for 89.

Their responses will dictate increases and decreases.

Stay tuned.