Alexi Santana wrote:
It's definitely a case of correlation being touted as causation. I work in a field basically focused on identifying causation and it's amazing how many studies actually don't make any sense once you dive into the results.
For example on the grocery finding - I bet it's harder to get groceries delivered in more rural areas, so those getting groceries delivered are in more urban areas that are more likely to have hotspots and many people nearby. So the correlation makes sense, but it's not causation.
The dog correlation is less obvious to me. I still highly doubt that having the dog is what actually causes someone to catch COVID.
I found the dog correlation more obvious. In my neighborhood, the dog walkers are out there 3, 4X/day at least. Bumping into other neighbors, chatting with the other dog walkers out there, etc... While those who don't own dogs - we don't see them out hardly at all. Much easier for them to self isolate. My wife came in from a walk today and related how she encountered a 'close talker'. Plausible?