So much misinformation here. Unreal.
And you're holding parliamentary elections in a few weeks, in this backdrop where half the people are spreading lies.
The country is fecked.
So much misinformation here. Unreal.
And you're holding parliamentary elections in a few weeks, in this backdrop where half the people are spreading lies.
The country is fecked.
We are definitely being lied to by the media.
This video includes clips of Kary Mullis discussing his PCR procedure.
dunes runner wrote:
The PCR procedure - which is a procedure not a test - does not test for a virus, and certainly does not test for a covid19 virus. The PCR test was developed in 1980 by Kary Mullis, i.e. 40 years ago! long before the imaginary covid19 virus was invented by the vaccination corporations.
--
The genome that's being amplified is a portion of human genetic material which every human has. Thus with enough amplification and/or enough repeated testing, EVERY human being on earth will eventually test positive - for being HUMAN, not for having a virus. This is why people can have consecutive tests that are either negative or positive, and then again negative.
Too much stupid in this post I don't know where to begin. PCR doesn't care where the DNA came from. Human, virus, platypus. You put in two primers (short DNA sequences) which bind to matching DNA in the sample, and PCR simply copies then amplifies the sequence in between. Or not, if the matching sequence is absent. COVID DNA sequence is not in human DNA. Use COVID primers and it will not amplify from human DNA. Or platypus. Please refrain from posting on something you know less than zero about. Sincerely, your salty neighborhood molecular biologist.
Now, samples can be contaminated. And people can be exposed to and have some virus yet not actually get fully infected for a variety of reasons. False positives do happen. But not because PCR by default amplifies human DNA. SMH.
There certainly was, but you made it anyway.
For a quarter of a second my initial reaction was to laugh. Then immediately after that, it was a cringe.
It's amazing the ignorance of science and also number of logical fallacies showing up on here about CoVid being 'fake: or a 'sham'. After a certain point ignorance is a choice, folks.
Imwithstupid... wrote:
PCR doesn't care where the DNA came from. Human, virus, platypus.
COVID DNA sequence is not in human DNA.
That's what I've been saying the whole time.
It would help if you watched the whole video.
#1- A covid virus was never isolated from uncontaminated material;
#2- The PCR procedure that's being done is amplifying a portion of Human Genetic Material;
#3- NOT a virus -- see #1;
#4- Finding that portion of human genetic material is NOT a positive test for a virus;
#5- Especially not a virus that's never been isolated, which means that it's never been found;
#6- And therefore it's never been proven to exist.
Koch's postulates.
The covid19 deception and the fake testing process.
dunes runner wrote:
Imwithstupid... wrote:
PCR doesn't care where the DNA came from. Human, virus, platypus.
COVID DNA sequence is not in human DNA.
That's what I've been saying the whole time.
It would help if you watched the whole video.
#1- A covid virus was never isolated from uncontaminated material;
#2- The PCR procedure that's being done is amplifying a portion of Human Genetic Material;
#3- NOT a virus -- see #1;
#4- Finding that portion of human genetic material is NOT a positive test for a virus;
#5- Especially not a virus that's never been isolated, which means that it's never been found;
#6- And therefore it's never been proven to exist.
What portion of the human genome is being amplified?
It would be easy to subclone the PCR bands and expose this if it were true... yet nobody has.... hmmm
dunes runner wrote:
The PCR procedure developed by Kary Mullis in 1980 amplifies human genetic material. It doesn't test for a virus, and it doesn't show any covid positive rates, so your source is making things up that aren't true.
Why do you keep up with this misrepresentation?
The RT-PCR part of the test is indeed not the detection, but the amplification of sample. Every test, whether it be for sewerage microbiology or tap water fluorides , has an element of sample preparation.
Once the sample is prepared for analyses, it undergoes detection of relevant parameters, be that Fluoride PPM, or RNA amount.
RT-PCR as a sample prep can indeed amplify all types of RNA/DNA, but that does not mean the detection is the same material as human DNA, please don't be so ignorant.
That said, there is no requirement for you, nor anyone else to understand this in order to believe it. Simply because you are unable to understand the science (which I have put as simply as possible), does not mean it is not true. The man in the street does not need to understand how his heart works, or how a car engine works. He just believes those who know.
Sorry that you cannot understand anything outside of your day job, if you even do, which is probably fruit picking or brick stacking, but don't come typing here like a mad monkey trying to reverse years of knowledge.
YMMV wrote:
Turtle123 wrote:
False positives are a thing. He didn't have any symptoms so it was most likely a false positive. Same thing happened to Matt Stafford. This testing thing isn't 100% accurate...
It doesn't even seem to be 40% accurate. Just a sham.
Are you saying 40% of negative people test positive , or 40% of positive test negative?
It can't be both.
The current USA positive infection rate per test is 6% (8.5M/127M).
Australia is 0.3% (27K/8.3M)
If your 40% is correct, and no people were infected/covid does not exist, then the numbers infected would be 51M (instead of 8.5M) and 3.3M(instead of 27K) respectively.
You guys state things in writing not knowing how dumb it makes you look.
Dementia Joe will save you wrote:
the height of idiocy wrote:
I remember back in the old days (2019) where people didn't get tested for illnesses unless they actually felt ill.
Get woke man. We’ve got a populace to scare and control and an election to win.
And lots of property and business to steal via lockdowns
Trying to tamper and misrepresent the procedure, saying you don't understand or that you're dumb and only able to call names or whatever - are not valid arguments.
--
My postings are valid because they are based on the science and the truth.
--
Plus I have backed up my statements with detailed videos that show why they are true and that they've not been refuted.
--
As of today, there still has not been any covid19 virus that's been isolated from contaminated material, and thus no covid19 virus has ever been proven to exist.
--
What is being tested is not a covid19 virus, but a portion of human genetic material, as shown in the videos that I've posted.
covid hysteria wrote:
Tests positive on Wednesday.
Negative on Thursday, Friday and today. Coaching tonight.
It’s time to get back to living people.
Look up false positive
dunes runner wrote:
Trying to tamper and misrepresent the procedure, saying you don't understand or that you're dumb and only able to call names or whatever - are not valid arguments.
--
My postings are valid because they are based on the science and the truth.
--
Plus I have backed up my statements with detailed videos that show why they are true and that they've not been refuted.
--
As of today, there still has not been any covid19 virus that's been isolated from contaminated material, and thus no covid19 virus has ever been proven to exist.
--
What is being tested is not a covid19 virus, but a portion of human genetic material, as shown in the videos that I've posted.
Answer my question - what part of the human genome is being amplified?