2600 bro wrote:
they are staffed by humans who would rather allow one weirdo to come in than risk a big scene
That explains why they let you in then. I was wondering about that so thanks for explaining.
World Health Organization Appeals to World Leaders: STOP USING LOCKDOWNS- MAKES POOR PEOPLE POORER
Coronavirus
General Discussion
Report Thread
You are reporting this thread to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum.
-
That explains why they let you in then. I was wondering about that so thanks for explaining. -
2600 bro wrote:
Also at this stage you are the one virtual signalling by refusing to obey property owners rules.
Again you're confusing private property with public accommodations.
--
Plus you're the one who keeps virtue signaling, by making personal attacks while you're wearing that diaper on your face.
--
I don't attack anyone, Mr. Virtue Signaler.
You're welcome to wear that diaper on your face for as long as you want.
In fact, I sincerely give you my permission to keep wearing that diaper on your face for the rest of your life. -
Private property and public accommodation are not mutually exclusive - stop repeating yourself and respond to the ideas! Be strong, bro!
I feel like I am talking to a wall, but luckily I enjoy this part of my day :)
I do this in service of others. -
2600 bro wrote:
Just imagine believing a business owner, who every day risks money and time to provide a service for and gainfully employs others, is REQUIRED to submit to the whims of every wacko leech on society who wanders their way.
Exactly. I completely feel for them having to submit to the whims of the vaccination corporations, and having to let all the diaper wearing leech wackos like you in their stores, so I appreciate you admitting your personal feelings about the terrible things you've been doing.
2600 bro wrote:
But hey, it's LRC, some real low-lifes here.
Yes, you sure are demonstrating that every single time that you post. As I said previously, I think they should ban you for all the low life name calling and personal attacking you do, and it's sad that they don't. There is never any credibility in your postings, only false suppositions, name calling and personal attacks. What a sad situation. -
2600 bro wrote:
Private property and public accommodation are not mutually exclusive - stop repeating yourself and respond to the ideas! Be strong, bro!
They are not the same thing.
You're obviously wrong so stop repeating yourself, and I'm not your bro.
I feel like I am talking to a wall, but luckily I enjoy this part of my day
Of course you do, because you like to troll people and roll around in the gutter.
--
You're doing service to others by twisting the truth, name calling and making personal attacks? I see. That must really make you feel great. Not really, but perhaps that's all that you have.
--
The only people I see you serving are your masters. -
dunes runner wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
If you are not claiming a disability, then you are not protected by the ADA
I never said that I was, so again you are misrepresenting what I said.
rekrunner wrote:
the business owners have the right to refuse to serve you, and you would have no real recourse under the law.
Again, no they do not. Ethnicity is not a disability, and business owners don't have the right to discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, nor because of how someone looks, or anything else that falls under the definition of discrimination, such as trying to force someone to wear a filthy breathing restricting diaper on their face in order to shop. They are not allowed to do that.
--
If you think you're right, then why are the stores allowing me to shop with no mask? All of them have big signs in front that masks are required for shopping, and yet they let me right in and don't say a word to me. Why is that? Out of the kindness of their hearts? Or because they know that they don't have the right to prevent me from shopping.
--
I don't really care which one it is, as long as I'm able to get the shopping done that I need to do and to not be hassled by virtue signaling irrational people wearing diapers on their faces.
So if you never said that, and I'm saying "you are not claiming", isn't that an accurate representation?
Business owners cannot discriminate against protected classes. Race is a protected class. How someone looks is not protected, nor is refusing to wear a mask. Businesses have the right to refuse you service, particularly if they decide that the health or safety of other customers is at risk.
I can guess many reasons why businesses would not enforce a mask mandate, but business owners would be well within their rights to ask you to cover your mouth and nose, or to leave. -
Rekrunner,
We obviously have different views, experience and understanding about what stores can and cannot do, so perhaps we can just agree to disagree rather than rehashing the same points and arguments.
--
One thing I will add though, is that stores are being forced to abide by the mandates by various threats including the threat of being shut down. Thus the store owners have not been given any choice in this matter. As far as I know, none of them want to have to abide by the mandates, but again that's just my viewpoint and I'm sure yours is different.
--
I have had a great number of employees in stores tell me they wish they didn't have to wear the masks, and that they wouldn't wear them unless they were being forced to do so, again by store owners who wouldn't even post the signs and so on if they hadn't been forced and coerced to do so themselves.
--
With these things in mind, I imagine not only the employees who have told me so, but also quite a few of the store owners are happy when they see people coming in with no mask on their faces. -
"Agree to disagree" always seems like a copout.
With respect to legal rights, it is not a question of your view versus my view. It is a question of laws that have clear definitions, and case precedents. You were praised earlier for being well researched, but apparently not in law.
It is not unusual for state mandates to be enforced, even if store owners and employees and customers don't agree.
Nobody wants a worldwide pandemic either. -
Yeah they start something at first but when they see the scale of the calamity and that it is not so cool as it seemed before they start saying to governments to stop lock downs. Should not have started that in the first place.
-
1/11 THE RISE OF STILLBIRTHS DURING COVID-19 LOCKDOWNS
https://twitter.com/OBusybody/status/1323361445514481666
https://reliefweb.int/report/world/neglected-tragedy-global-burden-stillbirths-report-un-inter-agency-group-child -
Allen53 wrote:
1/11
Allen - you are the letsruns hero that we all needed. You have changed 1000s of opinions and saved the world with from bill gates with your posts. We are forever in your debt.
;-) -
Allen53 wrote:
1/11 THE RISE OF STILLBIRTHS DURING COVID-19 LOCKDOWNS
https://twitter.com/OBusybody/status/1323361445514481666
https://reliefweb.int/report/world/neglected-tragedy-global-burden-stillbirths-report-un-inter-agency-group-child
Why would the media care anything about stillbirths? Hundreds of thousands of babies are aborted in America every year, and the media leans toward the encouragement of that. -
Biden is directly going against WHO recommendations on lockdowns, since he has orders from higher authorities centered in Davos, i.e. the Great Reset Agenda. This is not at all about a virus which is non-lethal to 99.9% of the population, but about global technocratic control of all populations in the West.
