Enough is Enough wrote:
I'm 36 and have a running induced foot injury. Three years ago I had a major leg injury that basically crippled me for seven months. Running has given me so much in my life but I am just thinking it's not worth it anymore. I always loved to run and compete but at this point in life I don't want to have my legs and feet screwed up as I get older. I see bike riders riding for hours and hours and having few injuries. I hear about pro riders with resting heart rates in the thirties and I see their veined up legs and I honestly wonder if that's the smarter option. I'd like to be fit and healthy without being debilitated.
As I get get older my ratio of running to cycling has shifted. Through my thirties and until my mid forties, I only ran. I gradually added more cycling and reduced running. Now in my late '60s, I run four days a week and cycle three. But as I continue to age I probably will shift the ratio more to cycling.
Yes, there are dangers. Ride dedicated bike paths and lanes when possible, and riding with others gives you all more visibility. I also have lights and light-colored, reflective cycling clothes. I also suggest that if you need to ride in the rain, only do it with a bike that has disc brakes. They cost more, but bike crashes (even without a car involved) can cause a lot of damage. I'm five years out from a trip to the ICU, so I know what I'm talking about on that subject.
Cycling is a good, low impact activity that you can enjoy into your old age. And if the weather is bad you can get a trainer for your road bike or and exercise bike. Lots of cyclists like Peloton or Zwift to keep them motivated indoors. I'm a pretty motivated guy, and I just listen to music when I'm on the indoor trainer.