pupil3142 wrote:
where the brains at? wrote:
Easy to find info on this and it explains the BS high rate of covid positives. Dr. Yeodon was also key advisor to Pfizer.
https://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/opinion/covid-pcr-test-prone-to-hatching-false-positives/ar-BB19O5LoThat Phillipines article is just words - no evidence at all.
Harambe summarises it much better.
Lol. Of course he does because he is likely you.
The article is just words, but the other poster uses words more comforting to you?
Harambe wrote:
where the brains at? wrote:
Lol. Only thing refuted is another lefty America-killers thinking process. I think what they're trying to convey is that up to 90% of positives may be a false positive. But you know, some people draw their own conclusions.
With that said, if it is a 7.5% positive rate in the Phillipines, it means that 90% of those may be false positives. So you're looking at about .5% positive. If that. But let's keep pumping the covid hysteria. The MSM and corporate overlords must be loving you COVID narrative lappers. You make such useful hand puppets for them.
90% false positives would mean something like a 7% false positive rate, roughly. For a RT-PCR test that would be extremely poor. Do you have evidence of such a high rate?
You didn't understand my argument -- 7% positivity rate means that the tests can't be mostly false positives unless there is a massive issue with the quality of tests and procedures.
I kind of think this means false positive? You wouldn't say?
https://canadafreepress.com/article/the-whole-scam-just-fell-apart-covid-test-overwhelming-number-of-false-posiwhere the brains at? wrote:
fvck me wrote:
So I clicked through but it’s a long almost unreadable rant.
Also it makes no sense to be against lockdowns and masks. The latter is to prevent the former. That’s like being against abortion and contraception, and no one’s that dumb.
Yep. Naturally unreadable to those that are so thoroughly brainwashed & deeply committed to the corporate/state tyranny programs. Definitely must cross your wires.
Nah, that's a garbage article, bro. Posting tripe like that kills your credibility. Try not to do that again.
where the brains at? wrote:
I kind of think this means false positive? You wouldn't say?
https://canadafreepress.com/article/the-whole-scam-just-fell-apart-covid-test-overwhelming-number-of-false-posi
A different kind of false positive. The PCR test didn't fail -- there is true viral material!
I agree it would be nice to have a better handle on the ratio of viral material: infectivity.
The positive rate kind of controls for this error though. If the positive rate is increasing, its like more people are being infected -- there is true increase in virus spread. (Assuming no major changes in who is getting tested, etc.)
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Clayton Murphy is giving some great insight into his training.
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
NAU women have no excuse - they should win it all at 2024 NCAA XC