douglas burke wrote:
First of all condolences to the Ginburg Family and Friends.
As for the Replacement, Ginsburg was voted on to the Supreme Court by a 96-3 Vote.
One way to Honor her is for President Trump to pick a replacement who will be voted in by a similar OVERWHELMING VOTE, By BOTH Parties, Think of a Replacement who has a chance to be voted in by a 100-0 Vote. Do NOT Replace her with someone who will squeek in by a 51-49 vote, A Replacement who gets in by a close vote, a replacement who gets in by an overwhelming vote (Meaning at least 90 Votes) keeps the Country United.
Mitch McConell already said he will go ahead with the replacement before the election.
I love this [sarcasm].
When Republicans have the opportunity to win big, it some how is right for them to compromise but when Democrats have the same opportunity, there is no call for moderation.
Obama and Senate Republicans: put in a hard-right, religious, Constitutional judge. It will be in your favor come election day.
Also, when is Clarence Thomas retiring...? All-star move would be for him to retire and give Trump #4 in the beginning of his second term. Remember Gizzburg and Thomas were buddy-buddy. I wouldn't be surprised if Thomas steps down soon.