Primo Numero Uno wrote:
* wrote:
11 people per square mile
Yes because how COVID chooses to spread is looking at a states pop per sq mile then acts accordingly. There is a lot of open space where no one or very few people live. There are also a couple of cities where a decent number of people live. Not New York or another major city by any means, but not small towns at all. One city of over 200K and another close to one 100K. Not to mention several locales bustling with tourists. There are areas of population density where viruses can spread.
Looking at the pop density of the state as a whole is misleading because 90% of the population probably lives in 2-3% of the state and the other 10% is spread out over the rest.
It's fair comment that you can't just look at the aggregate numbers. In addition to the distribution of population, various lifestyle factors might be relevant.
But still, they are very different:
Sweden has Stockholm 1.5m, Gothenburg 600k, Malmo 300k, Uppsala 220k ... 10th biggest is 97k... 20th biggest is 64k.
It's a big difference to Sioux Falls 190k, Rapid City 77k, Aberdeen 29k, 10th biggest 12k
I think a better comparison might be another sparsely populated state. Is South Dakota doing better than Alaska, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, New Mexico, Idaho, Nebraska?