53.44 in 400 meters at 6'0 and 214 LBS from 2013. Is this a good time for someone that weighs 214 LBS?

It is excellent. Are you happy now?

matt_london_413 wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEe7s9vSR9k

53.44 hand timed in the 400 meter dash at 6'0 and 214 LBS from 2013.

Is this a good time for someone that weighs 214 LBS at only 6'0 tall?

Pretty sure it's a world record for 6'0 ft tall over 210 pounds

Hi Matt,

Thanks for sharing. This is a good start. I would say once you get under 50 that would be a solid time for your weight.

At 220 I ran 48.33 FAT in a race. When I was 210 I was mid 47. I'm 6' as well so we are the same height.

Meant to say if I would have taken a longer rest time on the 200s, not the 400s.

Jimmycrackkorn wrote:

It is excellent. Are you happy now?

Do UFC fighters or boxers run 400s at all as part of their training?

Or are there any Marines, Army, Navy, Airforce, etc that do 400s as part of their training?

How would this compare to the average person on letsrun at similiar heights and bodyweights?

Is this above average or below average for 214?

matt_london_413 wrote:

Jimmycrackkorn wrote:

It is excellent. Are you happy now?

Do UFC fighters or boxers run 400s at all as part of their training?

Or are there any Marines, Army, Navy, Airforce, etc that do 400s as part of their training?

How would this compare to the average person on letsrun at similiar heights and bodyweights?

Is this above average or below average for 214?

Another poster in this thread said he ran 48.3 FAT at 220lbs 6'

Doesn't seem to be a professional to me. Pretty good comparison to yourself.

Look up Fred Kerley

Big guys have certainly run a lot faster. I've read that both Wilt Chamberlain (list at 7'1"/250lbs) and Bill Russell (6'10"/215) broke 50 for 440 yards.

Yes, you are dumb because it is way above average for your weight. However, there have certainly been guys at your weight who have run 47 seconds so you are nowhere near the top.

It probably is a BMI world record for the 400. Well done!

That lean in in the beginning is illegal and probably took off 2.5 seconds from your time.

55.94 is your official time.

That's alright but there are high school girls that run faster than that.

If I were you I would start training harder. The Kenyans say Train Hard Win Easy.

Clearly a false start, too.

Wow. This was from SEVEN YEARS AGO, too?

And you really have a thing for saying "non-myostatin deficient person," don't you?

bigman400 wrote:

Hi Matt,

Thanks for sharing. This is a good start. I would say once you get under 50 that would be a solid time for your weight.

At 220 I ran 48.33 FAT in a race. When I was 210 I was mid 47. I'm 6' as well so we are the same height.

That's a really good time for that bodyweight. Good job.

Any videos of this to verify what you're saying is real? Where did you run your 48.33 FAT at?

Yes, you were awesome in high school, Matt.

matt_london_413 wrote:

bigman400 wrote:

Hi Matt,

Thanks for sharing. This is a good start. I would say once you get under 50 that would be a solid time for your weight.

At 220 I ran 48.33 FAT in a race. When I was 210 I was mid 47. I'm 6' as well so we are the same height.

That's a really good time for that bodyweight. Good job.

Any videos of this to verify what you're saying is real? Where did you run your 48.33 FAT at?

Not too many people document every average moment of their lives.

Slow is okay wrote:

Yes, you are dumb because it is way above average for your weight. However, there have certainly been guys at your weight who have run 47 seconds so you are nowhere near the top.

Who are the guys that have ran 47 at over 210 and 6 feet and under?

Also does anyone know what crossfit athletes run in the 400 in their workouts?