axe grind wrote:
Subway Surfers wrote:
The more times you race the more likely you are to be caught.
One day, I hope that someone pursues legal action in a statement such as this. You truly have no idea what you’re talking about.
He knows exactly what he's talking about. He believes they're on juice. Don't you? You have most certainly shown no proof that they're not.
The easy answer wrote:
axe grind wrote:
One day, I hope that someone pursues legal action in a statement such as this. You truly have no idea what you’re talking about.
He knows exactly what he's talking about. He believes they're on juice. Don't you? You have most certainly shown no proof that they're not.
I can assure that SH is not in any “juice”. She won’t even wear the new Victory prototypes because she feels that they are cheating.
In addition , simple proof would be no missed tests or positive tests. You and the lunatic you’re defending have likely never even met SH, yet you spout things like you’ve read her WADA reports. Just like the rest of the buffoons here, all you know is the cr@p you read in this dumpster fire...a cesspool filled with people that state made up stats and uninformed opinion as fact.
axe grind wrote:
Subway Surfers wrote:
The more times you race the more likely you are to be caught.
One day, I hope that someone pursues legal action in a statement such as this. You truly have no idea what you’re talking about.
They'd never bring it, if they knew what I know. You foolish American running fan.
axe grind wrote:
Subway Surfers wrote:
The more times you race the more likely you are to be caught.
One day, I hope that someone pursues legal action in a statement such as this. You truly have no idea what you’re talking about.
"Legal action"? for someone implying a person cheats on a thread on a message board? I think you'll need a new legal system for that one.
Lance Armstrong "never failed a drug test" either. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
I personally believe anyone that has any professional involvement with Nike in track and field is dirty at this point. The are soulless.
Subway Surfers wrote:
axe grind wrote:
One day, I hope that someone pursues legal action in a statement such as this. You truly have no idea what you’re talking about.
They'd never bring it, if they knew what I know. You foolish American running fan.
Judging from your ridiculous accusations, you know exactly jack squat about SH. You’re likely some angry east coast dude that believes the fairytales that he tries to pass off as fact on a random forum. You’re definitely not as bright as you believe yourself to be.
What's so crazy about a 4:34 close? Her 1500m converts to a 4:13 mile (4:12 1600m). She should be able to do 5 x mile in that at near peak fitness.
axe grind wrote:
The easy answer wrote:
He knows exactly what he's talking about. He believes they're on juice. Don't you? You have most certainly shown no proof that they're not.
I can assure that SH is not in any “juice”. She won’t even wear the new Victory prototypes because she feels that they are cheating.
In addition , simple proof would be no missed tests or positive tests. You and the lunatic you’re defending have likely never even met SH, yet you spout things like you’ve read her WADA reports. Just like the rest of the buffoons here, all you know is the cr@p you read in this dumpster fire...a cesspool filled with people that state made up stats and uninformed opinion as fact.
Well this aged well...
Shel wrote:
axe grind wrote:
I can assure that SH is not in any “juice”. She won’t even wear the new Victory prototypes because she feels that they are cheating.
In addition , simple proof would be no missed tests or positive tests. You and the lunatic you’re defending have likely never even met SH, yet you spout things like you’ve read her WADA reports. Just like the rest of the buffoons here, all you know is the cr@p you read in this dumpster fire...a cesspool filled with people that state made up stats and uninformed opinion as fact.
Well this aged well...
Yet so many fans know with absolute certainty their heroes aren't doping.
wtfbbq wrote:
rojo wrote:
If they do have kids, they need to wait at least 5 years as any American kids born within 10 years of 2015 have no chance. Remember, due to our bizarre birthright citizenship rules, Tirunesh Dibaba and Sileshi Sihine gave birth to an American in 2015.
Are our rulles that bizarre? Aren't most nations like this?
America is pretty unusual in giving citizenship to anyone born in the country regardless of their parents' nationalities. If you're born to foreign parents in European countries, there's usually a residence requirement (variable, but 5y would be typical) to claim citizenship.
Shel wrote:
axe grind wrote:
I can assure that SH is not in any “juice”. She won’t even wear the new Victory prototypes because she feels that they are cheating.
In addition , simple proof would be no missed tests or positive tests. You and the lunatic you’re defending have likely never even met SH, yet you spout things like you’ve read her WADA reports. Just like the rest of the buffoons here, all you know is the cr@p you read in this dumpster fire...a cesspool filled with people that state made up stats and uninformed opinion as fact.
Well this aged well...
Doh! Interesting...
axe grind wrote:
Subway Surfers wrote:
The more times you race the more likely you are to be caught.
One day, I hope that someone pursues legal action in a statement such as this. You truly have no idea what you’re talking about.
Hahahaha. Subway for the win!
But of course, his statement was deleted. Lolz!
Sami-246 wrote:
wtfbbq wrote:
Are our rulles that bizarre? Aren't most nations like this?
America is pretty unusual in giving citizenship to anyone born in the country regardless of their parents' nationalities. If you're born to foreign parents in European countries, there's usually a residence requirement (variable, but 5y would be typical) to claim citizenship.
Anchor babies for the win!
Subway surfers = Nostradamus; SH takes drugs; Zoom
Confession / Denial is forthcoming. lol.