Viking21 wrote:
As a track coach, I want to protect the actual females that run for me. You, and people like you, are quick to spout the "some women are excluded" nonsense while being absolutely unable to define what a women is. If I were a feminist activist, I'm not sure that I would be too pleased to discover that men actually make better women than true females do.
But as an intersex woman she's clearly treated by society in the same way as "actual females".
The discussion about individual parts of her body (see above comments about Adams apples, cheekbones, gentitals etc.) as if they are a collection of scattered parts is the same as women feel when their breasts, buttocks and legs are discussed.
Men are thought of as 'being physically attractive' whereas women are thought of as 'having physically attractive features'.
The whole 'definition of a women' is exactly the same argument society has been having for ages. Women stay at home, women are mothers blah blah blah. If society treats you as women (and they treat CS as such) then you are a woman.
Any feminist that can't see that similarity is doing themselves a disservice.