No, the punishment is perfect. If you like about why you missed a test, even 1 test, personally I think it should be zero tolerance and a lengthy ban.
Don't lie.
No, the punishment is perfect. If you like about why you missed a test, even 1 test, personally I think it should be zero tolerance and a lengthy ban.
Don't lie.
hdhehebdy wrote:
No, the punishment is perfect. If you like about why you missed a test, even 1 test, personally I think it should be zero tolerance and a lengthy ban.
Don't lie.
Proportionality to the current rules and sanctions .
321boom wrote:
heh... oh you poor remorseless druggie. bucktooth swamp thing.
the PURPOSE of your lying is in question you dumdum. of course you lied, so did your ho at your request, lil dumdum. we know that, duh, no one believes your bs excuses. that's... what your whole rambling is about, dumdum, isn't it? how stupid are you?
why do you keep dodging my questions, imbecile?
deflection with nonsense doesn't work if I keep shytting on you, which I'm happy to. can you come up with anything else? no? well then, nice job making yourself look even worse than before this thread, dumdum.
What question have you posed?
Your grammar has receded ,again, to the point of near total unintelligibility.
Have you read the decisions yet ?
Have you grasped proportionality yet?
Has it occurred to anybody that if every person who lied, to their employer , to the Police, to the Tax man, then lost their job then there would be hardly anyone in a job.
Certainly Trump would have gone or would never have been allowed to stand.
clown dumdum, I told you: go back and read what I wrote. everything you dodged- answer it, dumdum druggie.
you're still yelping the same limp nonsense. pfffft. druggie attention whore.
imbecile, has it occurred to you that not everyone that lies to their boss is doing so to hide plans to rob them with the help of taking performance enhancing drugs?
why did you involve your thot in lying?
how does it feel having one appeal fail already?
321boom wrote:
clown dumdum, I told you: go back and read what I wrote. everything you dodged- answer it, dumdum druggie.
you're still yelping the same limp nonsense. pfffft. druggie attention whore.
Noted that you refuse to be a gentleman and repeat your question; a question I can’t determine.
My questions however are clear.
Have you read the decisions?
Do you understand. “ Proportionality ?
321boom wrote:
imbecile, has it occurred to you that not everyone that lies to their boss is doing so to hide plans to rob them with the help of taking performance enhancing drugs?
why did you involve your thot in lying?
how does it feel having one appeal fail already?
Read the decisions!
And what in your restricted thoughts made you assume I am involved in the case?
michelle v wrote:
Noted that you refuse to be a gentleman and repeat your question; a question I can’t determine.
My questions however are clear.
Have you read the decisions?
Do you understand. “ Proportionality ?
clown dumdum, what kind of illiterate bs is this?
why can't you 'determine' simple stuff? it's clear, go back and read everything I wrote. it's the only stuff of any value in this thread anyway. your pathetic comprehension problems aren't my concern, clown dumdum.
which so called 'decisions' do you keep yelping about? the ones where they rightfully issued your druggie self a 4 year ban or the ones on your failed appeal? hmmm? which? why don't you just quote it like I did? oh cause you're trying to imply sth that's not there, clown dumdum. that's what you do when having nothing real to retort with.
pathetic
321boom wrote:
imbecile, has it occurred to you that not everyone that lies to their boss is doing so to hide plans to rob them with the help of taking performance enhancing drugs?
why did you involve your thot in lying?
how does it feel having one appeal fail already?
You sound like ventolin after a head injury.
321boom wrote:
michelle v wrote:
Noted that you refuse to be a gentleman and repeat your question; a question I can’t determine.
My questions however are clear.
Have you read the decisions?
Do you understand. “ Proportionality ?
clown dumdum, what kind of illiterate bs is this?
why can't you 'determine' simple stuff? it's clear, go back and read everything I wrote. it's the only stuff of any value in this thread anyway. your pathetic comprehension problems aren't my concern, clown dumdum.
which so called 'decisions' do you keep yelping about? the ones where they rightfully issued your druggie self a 4 year ban or the ones on your failed appeal? hmmm? which? why don't you just quote it like I did? oh cause you're trying to imply sth that's not there, clown dumdum. that's what you do when having nothing real to retort with.
pathetic
Unintelligible drivel.
I am not banned.
Have you read the decisions ?
Do you understand proportionality?
michelle v wrote:
321boom wrote:
clown dumdum, what kind of illiterate bs is this?
why can't you 'determine' simple stuff? it's clear, go back and read everything I wrote. it's the only stuff of any value in this thread anyway. your pathetic comprehension problems aren't my concern, clown dumdum.
which so called 'decisions' do you keep yelping about? the ones where they rightfully issued your druggie self a 4 year ban or the ones on your failed appeal? hmmm? which? why don't you just quote it like I did? oh cause you're trying to imply sth that's not there, clown dumdum. that's what you do when having nothing real to retort with.
pathetic
Unintelligible drivel.
I am not banned.
Have you read the decisions ?
Do you understand proportionality?
I have done my best to put my mind as that if a limited 4 year old and re read the above and it is clear that you have not read the decisions and have lied to give the impression you have.
Or it could be that you have read them and deliberately lied as to what they say.
Please advise which ?
michelle v wrote:I have done my best to put my mind as that if a limited 4 year old and re read
Please advise which ?
clown dumdum, what the heck is this unintelligible drivel?
for a clown constantly harping about my superior intelligence being 'not up to par' with your lonely braincel you sure do sound retarded, clown dumdum. constantly.
I quoted an antidoping officer resonsible for banning you. I shytted on you in many ways. how come you still can't even make a single point? got anything substantive at all? anything? no? it's your livelihood at stake, clown dumdum. go ahead and post a quote worthy of my atention, clown dumdum. I dare you. can you muster up one thing that will make you look less guilty?
new phone who dis?
321boom wrote:
michelle v wrote:I have done my best to put my mind as that if a limited 4 year old and re read
Please advise which ?
clown dumdum, what the heck is this unintelligible drivel?
for a clown constantly harping about my superior intelligence being 'not up to par' with your lonely braincel you sure do sound retarded, clown dumdum. constantly.
I quoted an antidoping officer resonsible for banning you. I shytted on you in many ways. how come you still can't even make a single point? got anything substantive at all? anything? no? it's your livelihood at stake, clown dumdum. go ahead and post a quote worthy of my atention, clown dumdum. I dare you. can you muster up one thing that will make you look less guilty?
I repeat that I have no convictions for doping and am thus guilty of not one thing.
Have you read the decisions or do you continue to mislead and misquote?
Do you understand proportionality?
did you sober up? you slightly improved your poverty grammar, so you must have sobered up, right?
nice job, lil fella!
so will you ever make an actual statement, clown dumdum?
what are you talking about?
what 'point' do you think you have?
why so scared to say anything substantive?
why do you spam entire pages gargling the same nonssnse. dodging like a little bytch?
it's not like you don't have anything, right?
come on, you feel endlessly entitled to dope, so tell us: why?
Read the decisions yet?
michelle v wrote:
_______________________?
why did you leave a blank space instead of saying something?
don't you have absolutely any self defence?
competely no argument?
321boom wrote:
michelle v wrote:
_______________________?
why did you leave a blank space instead of saying something?
don't you have absolutely any self defence?
competely no argument?
The arguments and responses are set out in the decisions , but you refuse to read them.
And do you understand “ proportionality “ yet?
michelle v wrote:_____________________________________________________________________________,________________________________.
______________________________________“__________________“____?
uhuh, so clown bot is stuck. and apparently unable to use quotation marks properly. sad.
but not as sad as getting banned for 4 years for attempting to subvert doping control in the stupidest way. moran