Armstronglivs wrote:
While it may have been theoretically possible that the presence of a banned substance in her system was through food contamination CAS accepted the AIU argument on the evidence presented that it was of almost zero probability. Of the arguments on the table as to how she tested positive for nandrolone that only left intentional doping, which was the finding accordingly of the Court. The result was a 4 year ban.
“theoretically” is your word.
“contamination” is your word.
“zero probability” are the AIU’s words.
“possible” is the CAS’s word.
No other possibilities were considered at all, let alone considered more likely.